Show peculiar another 0 of those extraordinary aci ac bioni loo nobody attempts to explain or compre liend nd and which arc growing somewhat common in the first district court took 0 on saturday batur day the lo 10 last let day of 0 court mr geo T cleny bear was vaa called ailed up fur sentence and a sentence 0 of six months and fine w was as imposed ilia iho judo judge at the same time king t hat its ill the evidence allowed that lie had lived ins its first wife and ile he had not contested that fact lie vi nw its entitled to sonia some immediately of nt ter sentence sen counsel mr air J B milner presented prea a certificate tato os of probable cause for appeal for or tile judge judg 0 to sign s kit which Is i usually I 1 lone done t is ia tt it mitt cint ter berof of bourso course when it Is the intention to move for forbell or bul ball pending an appeal ills ilia lion honor r said bind tint that lie was wai not pi prepared pared to sign 8 I 1 tile certificate sir mr desired him la to examine and consider the evidence evila which lie said lie would do and announce lna his decision A few minutes afterwards deputy stepped into the chobar bar of the court room and an 1 tk t tu k 1 mr rany and bustled him off to tile pen a word 0 of explanation mr air milner stopped the proceedings then go ing on in court stating to ilia judge that the question of liia his admission nd mission to bail was still pending pon ding and mr air icae had been removed rein oed by the officer iron tile court colt rt room tho judo judge replied that it wils all r right 19 ht i lio lie had determined not to admit mr pally to bail just prior to thin lio hos never sever lio ile had bad admitted if mr mr james smith to hall bail who was as sentenced for or the same offense save sava that lie had mado made his bis home with liis second aril d tile tho ol of these facts acts we n 0 tire arc at t a loss lose to know just what lug ilia honor lionor meant in saying that mr air petty was vas entitled sniffled fled ito to consideration because of having liap hed I 1 with tho the first wife aia instead 0 ot L tho the second in its ireum enta on probable pr 0 bable cause for fo r appeal mr milner claimed that the court charged that the presumptions p law are in favor aar of 0 innocence until lohe evidence avi dence has been given ghen to tile the contrary to tile court replied 1 I did not charge th the jury ejury that any evidence woud woud be sufficient to remove the presumption innocence of had I 1 done so the would have been illegal now tile the ftp precise distinction between bean 1011 tile the words thine and ahny in legal parlance parlan cp we wa are not prepared to give but whatever it may bl bo we aru aro persuaded that in the fore agolig connection tho difference differ enco Is ie so BO line ann AS to remove it quite beyond tile the ton kon Wan ordinary juror at if we understood tile the points made by mr hr milner in hn his ap ar on the motion lor for a new trial in ili tho foregoing case actis e it would atrom been that there 01 me 9 some home questions alia thai ought ay to bo be adjudicated by pio 10 court I 1 ot of lint las t rd report 4 in liia ilia charge to tho grand jury in I 1 february judge henderson undertook to define de floethe the offense of unlawful cohall wo ve then looked upon late hw de da ns its mon roua in that thatis it was v as a direct contradiction of tile tho rukhi ruling of 0 the united up rowa court t and d bidd added e 1 1 in una unanticipated and unnecessary cruelty to the operations opera tiona ol of tho the law ve we scarcely bo be convinced then that lila hia honor was wai conscious bf b the full meaning of MB his words but we tire anro again confronted by tho the same bame vicious doctrine clabo rated and explained for tile the instruction of tho the trial jury in tile the ease case above aboe quoted the iha section of the statute says hta his honor under the prosecution Is brought is construed with the rest real of the act and is ia intended to prohibit a man who ft ho has formerly entered into plural marriage relations fromnic from nc lually or apparently before the ilia world conti continuing maing tho the plural marriage mar riago relation the tha lasi aw aimi at the wrongful wron giul example of an apparent as well as an actual continuance ti nuance ance of 0 tile the polygamous rel relation atlon wi without III lout reference to what actually oc oca ruts curs with ills plural or poly pol gamoua ganion wives if you believe believe beyond a reason reasonable ible doubt from tile the evidence given before you ou that before ill tho a earliest date mentioned in this indictment dict n tile defendant ent creed e d into marriage relation with any two of the tha women named in indictment this and that within the time covered corned by tho the charge lio lie continued such relations rela tiona with iny any to of them by living with holdi ing out or dolny any ally of the ilia acts which usually ul lally characterize characin charac tn w the relation of hui hue hand band and ii fiand and it was done by virtue of 0 such marriage marriaga lie ho would ba guilty cuilty under the charge 11 tile tho above seems seema too bly vicious to requard comment of 0 any suit we IVO repent in this connection that there tire aro yet ji a lew few questions which need adjudicating by tile the court of lost last resort and thit that very vory badly |