Show political and queries editor la in your our issue ot of the lath last ina in a communication relative to the payson election from bondur Bon jur igind I 1 find therol alio following at this thi meeting met ling tho the peoples party evidently divided and A a wedge entered splitting tile the interest of the pio peo pies cause tile disaffected ot of the peri pea alel pies party exulted over the success of 0 their position pogi tion most enthusiastically the tha fol following owing is is the result of the opposition the facts in the tha case casa aro are thesis these tho rue peoples People 49 party met pursuant to a cal I 1 and utter after the peoples Pe oplas officers wera nero ap pointed they decided in the regular way to havo thol tha nominations made from the lady body of the house haume the nominations were ft ere made and I 1 after being free freely di discussed is ius were ivra put to the tha house an unil I 1 c carried ar by ii majority vow role now I 1 al arn of tho tha bi opinion linion that as aa the tha majority carried tho the 1 la th ihu coue caucus elo meeting that the ticket elected an the iho ol of part party yand that the disaffected part were vera those wio who w were era in the minority mid and kicked because the ma majority rit y aoa would not 0 yield to them for the benefit e of a many 3 any and the enlightenment of bondur Bon jur in particular will you iou kindly give givena us your opinion on the following questions lit let when any political party meota in caucus tire are th the a results of tile the deliberations erat ions of the majority not the tha work of th the 0 p party ar ze 2 and 2nd it are those in the minority and who kick because the majority avi v tr il I 1 not tl yield liea lid to them not tile disaffected par ad should not majorities rule in in all caucus meetings f ath line not every member 0 of I 1 t alie Peo people plea ri party eual equal rights righta in 21 all 1 p political we meeting VOTER |