Show brain found quilty edu hdward ard brain charged cli arged with vilh resisting a deputy marshal was as a natural con re quence enco found guilty lilie like the rest of his hia core co religion dionista gio iata bhea hen brought before his honor at the and end of the testimony the arguments were commenced by mr BIT dickson Dicks ni alio ho advanced points that lie be claimed to nuke make it a case cage sir mr critchelow in defending said ho wa to see bee that lit tho 0 defendant had obstructed the officers in refusing koopen to open the door lio ito had not offered any resistance or van oven assault in trying to get own away y greenman had intercepted et and dal although though without a warrant arrested III him mr brown came next and reviewing the testimony showed aimed that the charges in the indictment had bad not been proven proven that even captain greenman a testimony did not agree with them johnsona son might have done dona if it had been made mad known to him what to testily testify but he ha did not the only offense it if offense it was that had been committed an and been heralded as a ilor naon outrage T lr was the act let that a mormon formon 1 lor whom the ilia officer had bad no v warrant arrant had bad been trying to get lit to a neighbors neighbor ls and the officer lia had pursued pu houed and arrested him the court had find I 1 sued issued s a an it order to serve a subpoena the tha was returnable six weeks before the occurrence and the officer had ad no right to serve sen en a new subpoena on tile the old order mr air brown pointed out to the jay jury that tha t they could not afford to convict tho t a defendant simply because A 1131 mormon ormon and because of the prejudice against that people it would not do to thus outrage justice for they knew not where the enmity of in an officer or tile the alcimus of 0 the p prosecution 0 on in might I 1 lit strike next there should be some ri g spain utah even tor for lie abe cormons mormons Mor mons 1 ur F echman had ano right to servo serve the subpoena at the tha time nor had the defendant offered any resistance but sin simply ply refused to assist the prosecution to secure a witness and in doing una this committed no offense Tenee of it tw the defendant had not beant a I mormon lormon there would have leen been gothing S in the caso mr dickson took exceptions exception of tile the attorney ford for tile tha defense ite ile did not think that his brother had grounds for the assertion that defendant was being prosecute rose buted merely because he be as a mormon the cormons mormons have rights in atall and the tha courts are not net I 1 engi engines nes of oppression and outrage opy judge udo zanes charge IF you yen believe beyond a reasonable treasonable doubt thata eliut J wi greenman had a to serve on anna peters avid and that defendant resisted or opposed the tha Iv service ervice of that sub acrin you should find bilm gi guilty tilty it if you believe from the evidence that did not know tho the deputies were trying to servo serve the sub peana or that the parties outside the door evere deg deputies utie you should find not guilty the deputy futy had a right to use nae forea force to enter I 1 it he had hada a subpoena to serve you should bould L judge from the evidence appears to bo be true and what appears to be false you lire are the judges of the credibility 0 of the witnesses the alie jury then retired and after being absent about 20 minutes returned the verdict guilty as aa charged monday at 10 it a motion for it a new trial will be made as that is tile the time set get tor for sentence if it should not bo be granted there will bo be steps taken for a new trial I 1 |