Show discharged damn dallin and dark clark sent home thear as jurors gone I 1 on the morning following tile the publication ol of tile ot of tho the istle dinst containing certain strict ui es cs in relation to Thomas dallin Ui illin one of tile the jurors who acquitted the brutal ledue or shurtliff we B learn iid that efforts were bei being ng mado made by the dallin with tho the diio advice and too ansel of an named W to ins A i suit for libel against the editor of tho the for lui out a po k en and fearless condemnation ot of the tha ja audgo id go suit and jury who tried the case auy against As we vo ente cro terol reil tile 1 I strict lerlia clerks office on oil Weil neelay moT morning allig we v 0 is eye ere accosted by Dal itris fl who ho demanded ilem a private ato interview the hie editor told him to call at tho the ENQUIRER office any time during reasonable hours houra that day and then pissed on oil into the court room some few hours later dallin arose in court and asked fit behalf of himself and dark clark to bo be released from further attends a e at a jurors owing to certain that had been made in the a and aid by private persons concerning their action in tho the case casa tho the court appeared willing enough to excuse them but in re reloa leasin sinz them assumed to criticism criticise critic ise ilia press anul public pt 1 for their utterances in connection w with th tho the case referred to some of tile opinions opi niona expressed by ills his honor on oil that occasion oc ca a ion wo we shall hereafter refer to the remarks of judge rowers powers veto ero as follows application lioa has been made mad to tho the court by two jurors mr dallin and mr dark clark to be ba excused from further attendance upon tho the court oft oa ing to certain strictures that have ban con made in the public press and by private peril persons one concerning conc cou ernins r 4 their actions lit it a recent case inin I 1 in wh chith h t they I 1 ley exercised their functions na am jurors the gentlemen stating to tile court that they havo have served faithfully since the beginning Kinning bi of tile term the thell first rat day of march 1886 and that they aln y have endeavored to do their whole dut 5 fairly fearlessly and impartially but that they feel eel under the circum circumstances atances that their usefulness as jurors is III gono gone whilo tile alio court does not agree v vilh ith then them with mith regard to that point never lelis I 1 feel that it is 19 my duty to excuse the non 1 roni roin further url lier attendance upon tile the court as jurors for or tho the vory very tea leaion n t eliat bat t clity ic have served this the people cople faithfull them alicia well ben ed bliem illious tle hope c of reward and have da as gool good citizens performer per performed formea that burden of jury jut dut duty 1 thu think under tho the and in view of what these men inen havo have done that hat the criticism ol of their conduct co lonies nies with ill III grace I 1 regret very much that any ny see sea tit fit to criticise criticism critic ise without dounda tion lion the actions ot of men amo are compelled to leave theli their homes and work vork for nothing to boat their own expense and whose only amard ard Is ft a ilear clear and tear fear less conscience the court stated d upon the verdict verdic t being rendered in that came that it had no I 1 in quarrel arret bith the jurors for their verdict zit that h it was a part of 0 ill air duty and with v ith them the hie responsibility restel rested it was as for forthe the court to determine di termine the law as well as ag it knew how it was for the jury ury to determine the facts arts na as well v ell as they could the jurors were under oath tile iho people who see fit to thein a are not onder oath the jurors were ft pro here performing a 0 public duty which they have ave to answer for hereafter upon their conscience those who w ho critic criticism criticise ise them have no such buch responsibility renting refit ing upon 1 tk them I 1 say bay I 1 regret that a t people le have seen it fit to do that the r rais 0 ip capt of course COMBO more or less le reason and excuse for ube cause it is a case that excited great public interest and the public interest and the public mind was greatly exercised over tho the trial imd the result but bat the public had not the responsibility upon them t that hat was upon these men tile the public did not sit nit in this jury box and listen to tile the ny the public have not got to answer to the law lav to its conscience and to its god for the actions that there took place tile the court believes that the verdict of the jury in in that case as aa in every other casu case tb that at line lias been tried b before e me was the result of a conscientious performance of duty by the men ampon belled elleda as athey they saw their duty if they erred it was an error of the head and not of the tha heart to say otherwise is to say a very cruel and very unjust thing and todia to do a more grievous injustice than I 1 beli believe ce the people of 0 this vicinity desire desir e to do any person it is ia go BO easa to tear aw down own a mans man s character it is so easy to destroy at once with one stroke ins ills reputation it takes years ears to build it up veople do not stop to think of that however and they do not stop to think however that that ha t is al all there is of a mans life anyway anyta y every roan man seems to think and feel that he be is tile the judge and ajust judge 1 of his neighbors g 1 actions one rea reason s on I 1 regret this has be en an done is ia this I 1 keel feel that when a jury goes into that I 1 jury ary box if i they th eyare are honest men and the law presumes them to ha be honest until they are proven otherwise beyond ond a reasonable doubt that the public i out ought to say nay wo will abide by the verdict 0 il that th jury that is the tribunal that we ha have ve instituted lor for the determination of this question of fact and whatever they do under the instructions instruct iona oi of tile the court wo we will gladly bow to it I 1 that la is not done then tho the value of the jury system is pone gone because becal tse men will be b a swayed by public passion by public feeling by public prejudice if that is I 1 not done then theil a court of justice becomes sin simply aply a mockery of justice it becomes it a place P lace of injustice and of all the men mail in the world the bar the sworn attorneys of the court who have always beani been conservative through all the ages from the very earliest history down to the present limo and who have always 1 blood between an excited populace upon the one elle and those who are unjustly I accused upon the other side aide should be 1 the ilic first to say we bov boff without question to the verdict of the jury or to the eels I 1 ion on otho court now I 1 am satisfied and confident that title the time will come when some people who have these theao gentleman as ti they have been criticized criticised will regret it because it la Is not fair air it is kotright not right it to la not just I 1 wish to suggest to p people le who feet feel like making such criticism that t they should try to put themselves in these mens places phim what object have the they lit doing anything but that which tho aboy believe to be right what desire cort could d they havo have except a dimple justice should be done the law hedges the defendant f about with great safeguards and protections it requires tho the prosecution to not oft only produce a preponderance ot of evidence but ut to in nelce a ke an overwhelming i ABC it jury it 1 you havea have a reasonable doubt of c fi a mans guilt then under your year oaths oath you inest find him innocent it leanold ia an old ol of the law I 1 that has baa come down to us ua from england that it is farsbetter far ar better that 09 guilty me men n should shaul d than chiat thiat one innocent innocci it ma man should be punished BO tender is i tile the law ot of human aca 01 bunian life ille now if 11 that Is tho the law it ii we believe fir such we certainly ought to uphold I 1 do defend I 1 end and iland by the very instrument that wo we have created for 0 o tho the ot of i of 0 fact I 1 I 1 I 1 q 1 0 O I 1 f corone for one andas and as the audo ottlia cobit 1 sl eting here re representing presen ting the territory ot of utah and nil tho the government of the ignited I 1 cited states 1 want ant to say bay that no mutter matter what ulay have been my iny private bews as to tile evidence that I 1 firmly finlly belilove slid and hilve have never neer state I 1 other avise IBO or thought otherwise than that the i A verdict ol of that jury was the result of the consciences of the inca i aho vho ito v were eta en pannel leJ led it was vv as nota not a gentile jury it I 1 was MM a jury jurs composed coin posed ol of 1111 tile til and an L intelligent cormons mormons ions we vie ought to stop and think when we no are about to criticise critic so ise their actions w whether hither if we had been in fit their alicei pla cei we wa t riot not little have ilone done those men did it is not the verdict of one mail in w it is the verdict of twelve men inch each and every emy man re for his portion 0 of it it not to bo be Ilea polI upon one man or upon two tv 0 men or lip ip ini oliree dpn it 11 lit is tim tile do liberato nordica eri liLt ol of twelve well nun tinder oath and if it is in not that then man committed perjury I 1 feel that I 1 ought to say this inucci enuch in behalf lielia lt 0 of tho the gentet mea who w no have faithfully acted in this ourt court their part who ho have done their duty eta as citizens with out pay and I 1 hope tint that the people ol of tills this community coln will relied reflect an antl I 1 conal consider er whether w it is best whether hether it is ia ri glit whether it is just juit whether it Is in proper that so severe things should be sail Hind of otmen men who are swat n to execute axi cuto the thelah law the court is alio croper place to make inaho the criticism lit K the jury ia dis honest it i tile jury ury is corill corrupt t instead of 0 crying it about the streets A those alho w leavo lave tho the proofs como come into court and present it to the judge that tile the men I 1 bo ci cited led to allow cause why they shum should sh um not at te punished fal I 1 ell for their conduct begin do not lot let us dent with ft ath tumors s le it I 1 us n deal with will nets facts it may bo be said by some same that these remarks are out 0 of place but I 1 do not believe they are I 1 I 1 believe in it a inan trying to do justice trying to do right and in lis his putting nia fils oot foot upon injustice w chenever he sees it gentlemen you are discharged charged dr |