Show STRANGE proceeding of the jury in theasa field bros case THEY AGREE AND DISAGREE tho equity calender of the first district court is set darger vs le case there waa a peculiar proceeding in court this morning the jury in the case of ephraim nash vs tiros who had been allowed to return a sealed verdict came into court and a verdict ot for the plaintiff was declared but when the jury were polled to the surprise of everybody thatcher hallett and F D alexander answered that it was not their verdict the jury were remanded back to the jury room and after an absence of thirty minutes were cent for his honor considered such conduct unwarrantable and sharply reprimanded the two jurors such conduct was unworthy of any gentleman or any man of sense mr hallett desired to explain but bis honor would to no explanation the jury was discharged the equity calendar was set as follows charles crane vs B watts et al D vans and S it thurman geo sutherland november 24 silas reed vs geo pearson et al A G sutherland bennett bradley november 17 alfred A D devaus november 17 louis bonkofsky ys john green W J anhder bennett bradley november 17 geo monroe vs margaret monroe J S giles W H king november 18 johannah evenrud vs hans olsen etal william K reid william zabriskie november 18 robert L allan vs john martin hall marshall thurman sutherland und king november 18 spanish fork city et al vs moses B gay et al A thurman king and geo sutherland D evana november 19 christina mclain vs wm J mclain M M kellogg Novem bei 19 mary miller vs conand miller J S watts november 19 anna marks vs dougald mcmurphy J L Ilaw lings november 20 mary 0 york vs theo M camuei son et al thur vao i ss king november 20 hans poulson vs theo M samuel POD et al thurman king november 20 R W brereton et al vs theo M samuelson Sam nelson et al A thurman king november 21 salina creek irrigation co va salina stock co jacob joanson Job bennett A bradley november 22 sanpete county vs emery county and J D kilpack jacob john son and W K reid bennet marshall and bradley november 22 jane E ketcham guardian etc vs james dunn administrator J S giles thurman king november 24 I 1 david keith et al vs joseph garlin aki et al bennett bradley S H lewis november 25 and cases john va hannah mc machnic Cach nic D evans november 24 mary vs walter G fowler J S watts november 28 karren lundquist vs 0 N lund nuiet M M kollodge Kollo dg november 28 emily hindmarsh vs ted hindmarsh J E booth november 29 henry P jensen vs johannah dpn sen baboth wilson and wilson sutherland judd november 29 abue C nielsen vs andrew P nielsen november 29 martha erickson vs erick erickson thurman king december 1 else S arnoldson vs lars arnoldson jacob johnson december 1 springville Spring ville vs james hayley S R thurman december 1 william R smith et al vs jonah phillipa thurman fe sutherland booth wilson december 2 william brock vs viola brock L J mccabe december 3 thomas wright jr administrator vs joseph F wright et al sutherland Sut heiland judd marshal royle december 3 joseoh bate administrator vs peter bellu D houtz booth december 4 william R may vs nephi irrigation co december 4 P C anderson et al vs neils L ellason et al wm K reid december 5 thomas W vs george brown et al william K december 5 magdaline vs peter revoir Thu king booth wilson december 6 rebecc C haymore va edgar haymore thurman king houtz december 8 martha fuller VF sandford fuller et al thurman king houtz J B mij ner december 9 artemus holman vs pleasant grove citver al december 9 charles poynter vs james chipman efa al E B critchlow taurman king december 10 P beers et al vs henry hays et al thurman it king geo sutherland and W dickson december JO christani mclain vs henry S brooks et al sis e whlter aton M M Kellu ir december 11 mercy willian hardwick december 11 mary M chislett vs jampa chirlett Chi alett Thur maii A king booth fe wilson december G tile case of dayer et al vs st V le ur was called and a jury paneled em mr kellogg the plaintiff and ma biovin the defendant the case is in relation to the ownership of miners tho plaintiff claims to biane located the mines first and to have been forcibly ejected by the defendants contrary to law when the first witness had taken the stand for the plaintiff mr brown objected to any testimony being heard on the grounds that the location of the claims from the description given could not be determined gC ourt until 2 his honor reserving his decision until after noon |