Show r Livestock Amounts to Cash income More Moie than three fourths of the cash income received b by Utah farmers from sale of 1958 agricultural products c earn came a m e c efrom from sales of livestock and a n d livestock products a study just published by the Utah Agricultural Agricultural tural Experimental station reveals re re- The analysis of cash sales by county and commodity covering covering covering cover cover- ing the marketing of 1938 crops and showing total cash receipts of oC is an annual project of the department of agricultural economics at Utah State University and is published published pub pub- by the experiment station as part of ol its Utah Resources Series E. E M. M Morrison professor and d acting head agricultural economics emphasized the figure fig rig figure ure should not be confused with net income of oC farmers since production costs were not part of the study The total includes government government government govern govern- ment payments under the conservation conservation con con- sugar and wool acts and the soil b bank he said It does not include value crops used for seed feed or 01 household household house house- hold use nor income from off off- farm work I I Box BOY Elder county with total cash income of topped topped top top- ped all other counties in the state Utah county in t first i is t price ce in 1957 was second and Cache third in total cash sales Davis county with total cash farm income of from sale of 1958 agricultural products products pro pro- ducts was in ninth place among the states state's counties Of this total total to to- tal came from sales of livestock and livestock Ii products products pro pro- ducts and included ducts and included |