Show ONE OF KINGS GEM ON Of 7IN Statement in Wollsvlllo Speech Picturesque Pic-turesque but Untrue The following correspondence between be-tween Dr George F Phillips of Wells vllle and the Hon Joseph W Babcock oC New York explains Itself and furnishes an Inlercallng sidelight on the methods of Democratic speakers to In licence the voters of Uluh Welsvllle Oct a The lon Joneph AS Uabcock Chulrinun CongressIonal Cnm palpn Cominlltce New Yorlt > 55eur Sin In I u 9piucli ilellwrfil I i hero TaHt night by llu hail V 1 King Congrojloiml cnn dldulo on the nrinocrntlc ticket he made tho assenl ion that In the Klfiynlxih Con grcsy whlh the Dlngley bill was Ulcer dlHciintlon you made tint following state ninni I to him The Dingloy bill Is 1 a damned fraud I IniiHmiich us this nllr > KUtlon Irf i llnhlu ton to-n ii much mlschlcf Ir true I 1 would ho olfllBiMl 1 to you bl behalf 0 Iho Kopubllcnn Congressional cnndldalc If you would state categorIcally wluthor there IK any truth In Mr Klnptt assertion Ki pecl fully yours GEt I 1 PhiLLIPS M f D ro this the following reply was received re-ceived yesterday by telegraph New uric Oct iDr Ihllllpii Wells vllle Ulnh Tho silnlomenl of Mr King that I said tho Dlnpley bill was a fraud IB a lie made out ol whole cloth 1 voted for Iho bill mid on July I 1WI published t loiter In which I said I freely Indorsed the DIiHlov bill and 1 l think that at the time It passed It was a wlf > c Judicious measure hI JOSEPH W BABCOCK |