Show I I The new expert In the Mollneux case Deems to be of opposite mind to some of the other experts particularly In tho Jlrst trial as to the Identity of tho defendants handwriting on some i of the Incriminating packages It IB about as misleading to pin much faith I on the writing detectives and experts I as to be altogether trustful of the mining min-ing experts To believe them all one would need a multiplicity of minds The present < trial of MoIIneux Is moving forward In a much more expeditious I and businesslike manner than the first and it would be no surprise if a different result were reached |