Show JONES DIVORCE CASE Much Testimony Taken in a Malodorous Malo-dorous Lawsuit The Jones divorce case held the boards In Judge Lewiss court yesterday Since Fred W the action of the corespondent Chase in bearing witness against the woman who If his testimony Is true should have the first claim upon his protection pro-tection the case has attracted more attention at-tention than the usual run of divorce cases Mary A Jones the plaintiff took the stand yesterday find tfstltied to various acts of cruelty alleged to have been committed com-mitted by her husband VIllard Jones She emphatically denied the testimony of ChtiBu John Woodmnnsco an accountant tcs tllled that he had examined the signature on a hotel register which Chase claimed to have written two years ago when he look Mrs Jones to the hotel and Judgrd from the appearance of the Ink that the wilting was not over two or three days old on the est of last August Frank Roux swore that he saw Jones push his wife out of their house and that lie prevented Jones from striking her Harry McCloud who according to the testimony of Chase had been with Mrs Jones on tho night of July lib swore that Chase told a falsehood McCloud also denied the testimony of Mrs Joness son that he had been In Mrs Joness room at night and stated that on the night in question the lady had been at Saltalr with friends both male and female and had been detained there until 1 ocxacic In the morning by an accident on the railroad rail-road The last witness called to rebut the allegations al-legations in the croKscomplalnt was J SLrlnufullow one of Mrs Joness attor neyi who said that young Jones had remarked re-marked the day after Chases deposition was taken that there was something back of it Indicating that he did not believe be-lieve at that time that his mother had done anything wrong l When court adjourned at t u oclock Judge Lewis stated from the bench that Information bad been conveyed to him that one of the parties to the suit had brought a rawhide Into court He thuru upon admonished those present that it was Improper to communicate such statements state-ments to a Judge sitting on a case Mr Jones stated afterward that his wife had threatened not only to rawhide raw-hide him but to cut his throat If he testified tes-tified against her The rawhide Is said to have been contained in a small pack ngo carried by Mrs Jones whon she entered the courtroom If the bundle really did contain a rawhide she made no attempt to use it although Mr Jones Lost lined Los-t that Hho had made life a burden to him since their marriage The case will be argued next Saturday Court Notes John S Charlton began suit In the Third District court yesterday against T JR Jones to recover l 1032 alleged to be due on a note since July IS 190 On motion of defendants attorney before be-fore Judge Morse yesterday the case of the Washington Rock Quarry company vs Lc Grand Young el al the defendant defend-ant was given until December 1st to llle exceptions The jurors were c cURe until 10 oclock this morning when they will report In Judyo Stewarts division of the District court I |