Show MR NEBEKER TO MR OWEN COUNTY ATTORNEY OF CACHE WHITES HIS FINAL LETTER I Scorns Mr Owens Advice and Says it is Wholly Gratuitous Business i Must bo Transacted in His Office I Logan March 23 1 Mr C M Owen Sail Lake City t Utah Dour SlrYlIuI impertinent ill tempered not to say scurrilous eplslle I of tho 17th inst came to hand one day < after Iho same appeared in The Sail Lake Tribune So much as apears to I be addressed to me In my official capa I Icily I-cily bus been noted As lo the major 1 j part of the letter Intended as it mani fcstly is foi public display and to grail J fy it seems lo me a puerile ambition Ion I-on your part to achieve newspaper no loriely J of course have nothing to say No doubt I should feel gratelul I for tho generous manner In which you J have advised me concerning lie duties of my office the more grateful indeed I because your advice Is Wholly gratuitous gratu-itous Jn passing permit 1 me to remark that your Innocence of legal learning Is surpassed only by the lavish manner I in which you dispense legal information informa-tion I have Informed you that 1 Avlll prosecute the cases you have called tom to-m attention whenever the evidence at 1 baud or obtainable Avlll justify such i action At this you affect to lake great i umbrage and you suggest that 1 should I come out fiatfooled and say that I Cache county Avlll not enforce the law 1 am contralned sir to think that the wIsh Is lie father of the thought I Avlll not libel Cache county with any i i i such statement but on the contrary < I Avlll rcpreat what 1 have said in former i I letters to you vj Jr Ihauthe ofllcars of CatIre county will prosecute violation of tho laws of the State Avhencvcr from 1 I limo I evidence they may reasonably ex I pect a convIctIon i i You say You seem doubtful of your I Jurors I have nuAer expressed or en lorlalucd any such doubts From whence have you derived this Solon I like I deduction You aHIc When you have digested the Merrill case Avlll you 1 alloAV me through i rounsel tu examine I the witnesses under oath In open court The < iuesllon Is ralher am biguous but if you mean to ask whether I wheth-er after I hud examined the Avllncsses for the prosecution J 1 Avould then turn the mailer over to you and your counsel coun-sel for furlhcr examination my answer I would be that I would not Impose any such farce and byplay upon the court j and the court would not permit me toO II to-O so even if I were so disposed I As It is nol my custom to exploit I cases In the public prlnls T Avlll ask Iou I-ou hereafter I to Iransael your business I with me prlAately In my office at the J courthouse this city Very respect I fully FRANK K NEBEKER 1 I |