Show HAWORTHS INSAN TY Three Medical Experts Who Dont Believe in It tHEY t THEY HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE JIll JI J I I Dr John W Givens of the Idaho State Insane Asylum Dr Pike Former dienl Superintendent of the Asylum at Provo and Dr Elias S Wright Salt Lake City Evidence I Evi-dence Will be All in on Monday I and the Case May Go to the JurY on Tuesday Night II I I Farmlngton Juno 1GThe Insanity experts that hae been put on the witness wit-ness stand by the State t oday to prove Haworths mental responsibility at the time the confession was made to Sheriff Abbott and Mr Ellison an March 20th this year gave testimony very damaging dam-aging to the defendant They agree that Haworth Jsat this lime a sane man though perhaps not one who possesses pos-sesses a very high order of Inlellcclu alliy All three witnesses were em phailc In their testimony and they had no hesitancy In saying that the defendant defend-ant is responsible for his acts Arguments to the jury will In all probability be commenced on Monday and the jury will have the case In hand by l Tuesday night at the latest Today is the beginning of the fourth week of the trial and all concerned are more or less weary of the lengthy proceedings FOR THE DEFENSE William Flint of Layton today said ho was passing near the Farmers Union store at about 1215 on the night of the murder and heard a sound at the store resembling I falling 1 I tinware This was probably the report of the shotgun when Sandall was killed ALLEGED ATTEMPT TO BRIBE John E Thurgood of Bountiful was called in rebuttal and Mr Allison asked him If John W Alt met him and offered of-fered 10 if I he would get on the Jury In tho Haworth case and do what ho could for defendant Mr Weber objected to the question as wholly Immaterial to the guilt or innocence In-nocence of the defendant Mr Allison insisted thaLlI was the right of the Stale to Impeach the testimony of a witness who on the stand denied al lenipllng to bribe witnesses or Jurors Objection sustained temporarily pending pend-ing the hearing oC arguments T1JJ3 PENDJ3R STORY Capt Browning of the Ogden police force was called In Hurrcbuttal out of order and asked if during last May when Jed Abbottt he deputy shorlff subpoenaed Detective Fender the lat ler said that he saw Haworth on Twen tyfifth street at 1030 or n oclock on the night of March 28 1S99 witness an swcrocl that no such conversation took place Under crossexaminallon witness wit-ness denied that Ponder had talked this mailer over with him since he Is nl I leged to have made the statement with vlow to having his veracity sustained City Jailer 1F Crllchlow Ogden testified that he uas present r when the conversation between Abbott nnd Pen dor took place and that Ponder made 110 such statement as that testified toby to-by Mr Abbott I INSANITY EXPERT John W Givens medical superintendent super-intendent of the Idaho State Insane In-sane asylum at Blacl root Ida was called by the SI ale and testified as an insanity expert The witness said that for eighteen years his specially had been the treatment of the Insane having had experience in Oregon and New York asylums as well as In Idaho Witness had heard the testimony offered of-fered In the case by experts for the defense de-fense and testified that he had made an examination defendant The great majority of patients suffering from alcoholic al-coholic insanity soon recover and arc released from tho asylum they comeback come-back worse and finally sink into chronic alcoholism The patient usually listless list-less has an Inexpressive manner does not read and there is almost entire mental inactivity A person suffering from alcoholic dementia would not be able to attend to his ordinary business nnalrs Dr Scott testified yesterday that when he examined Haworth he found the reflexes exaggerated Dr Givens was asked if a person suffering from chronic alcoholism would have exaggerated exag-gerated reflexes and he answered that he would not that in fact the reflexes would be diminished and the conditions described by Dr Scott would Indicate an absence alcoholic dementia After a person had passed the acute stage and entered even the primary condition of domentlo recovery Is practically Impossible Im-possible In a case of acute alcoholism the remedy I would be to take away the alcohol and the patient would recover gradually after the first few days Dr Givens then said he had privately examined the defendant the jail Ills temperature wan 9SA and his pulse was 7C both about normal In a person suffering I fering from alcoholic dementia there fiexes of the eye and other muscles are sluggish or absent in the defendant they were normal From conversations I with tho defendant and cocam I nations I found no symptqms of alcoholic dementia none whatever except lint the rather low order of mentality oC the defendant might be due to excessive drinking If defendant should ask for a diagnosis witness would say that If he lived a physiological life he would bo I able to live to a good age and exercise as much mentality as he has done heretofore I here-tofore Many technical questions as to the cmotiona tho will power and the per ceptive faculties were propounded and witness was then asked if in his opinion opin-ion tho defendant had ever suffered from alcoholic dementia He replied No Defendant may have been temporarily tem-porarily unbalanced at times as a result re-sult of prolonged sprees but In the absence ab-sence of liquor he would be sane To tho hypothetical question of Mr Allison Al-lison heretofore propounded witness said the defendant has been sane dur i ing his Jail life nnd that he was sano when wltn examined him in tho Jallt It was not unusual for persons accused or crime to feign Insanity Unddr crossexamination Dr Given said he found no during hin examination Haworth that Indicatedl feigned insanity that as a matter oC fact ho had found no evidences of insanity in-sanity actual or feigned Witness thought It might be that one who wa feigning insanity would accuse himself of a crime in order to prove his mental unsoundness or that he might choose to confess to a crime as a congenial and convenient form of suicide Mr Weber described Haworths attempted at-tempted suicide wheij he opened the artery In his wrist and the memorandum memo-randum book In Which tho rambling note was shown to witness and he was asked Jf the nota and the attempted suicide were not Indications of Insanr ity and he answered No that would make me think there was an attempt to fool me Answering the same hypothetical hy-pothetical question heretofore propounded pro-pounded by tho defense Dr Givens said such a state of facts would not cause him to think the dcfendnntr Insane at the time of the confession The crosse < nmintltlon of Dr Givens was concluded at tho afternoon sea slon I ANOTHER EXPERT Dr Ellas S Wright pf Salt Lake testified tes-tified that during tho past Hix years he I has had experience with from 250 to 300 insane patients He had visited the defendant In Jail on April 23rd and I I spent an hour with him had converged freely with Haworth as to his age occupation oc-cupation and habits of life defendant I had said positively that lie was not addicted ad-dicted to the excessive use of alcohol though he admitted that he had averaged aver-aged one spree a month Witness said I at that time defendant wns mimic and there wore no evidences of his huvlng heretofore suffered from dementia On a second visit May 2nd witness was with Uaworth houriiiid a half and the defendant talked freely Wit ness had Inquired If defendant was flit pcrstltious and the Jailer had disclaimed dis-claimed any belief Jn spooks and goblins gob-lins and said he was never troubled with halluciualions or delusion On that occasion tho defendant talked ia Uonally and cqherontly He was entirely en-tirely sane then J The condition of alcoholic dementia which the defense claims is llaworths malady was described as affecting tho victim with loss of memory Inactivity stooping posture loss of Will power and dullness of perception none of which symptoms witness had found in the defendant de-fendant Assuming the facts stated In hypothetical question of Mr Allison to be true witness said the man Is sane and was sane on March 30th when he confessed Witness said a man who had suffered from alcoholic dementia for from four to si = years as Dr ScottY Scott-Y MtcrL a testified concerning the dej fcndant could not concentrate his at lenlion upon any book game or business busi-ness enterprise as Haworth Is known to have done Under crossexaminalion Dr Wright denied that a mans brain power would necessarily Impaired to the extent of producing dementia by occasional sprees extending over a period of years Explaining this answer witness said It Is not the periodical drinker whose brain Is injured greatly but tho habitual habit-ual drunkard DR W R PIKE of Provo testified that he had had experience ex-perience for twelve years with Insanity patients In which time some 2000 insane in-sane persons had been under his charge Dr Pike testified the difference between be-tween acute and chronic alcoholism He said if defendant were a dement ho would not be able to recall past events and relate them correctly or to carryon carry-on an Intelligent conversation His facial fa-cial expression would be gone and ho would take no cognizance of happenings happen-ings around him He would not be able to carry on his business Witness said It IH not common to see a man in u stale of alcoholic dementia at the age of 36 Haworthsage The examination examina-tion of Haworth made by witness had convinced him that tho defendant is I sane and that he had never suffered from alcoholic dementia Mr Allison said that the State had three more witnesses to examine This will be done on Monday and the alga Hurrebuttal will be very lengthy meats should bo completed nn Tuesday as it is not likely that the evidence Jn |