Show OGDEN DEPARTMENT V SUED FOR UBEL V V Frederick A Shiells Asks 40000 Damages V V The Sail Iriiku Ueruld company was yesterday yes-terday made defendant In a IM 0 libel damage suit the plaintiff In time case bo Jog Frederick A Shiells Tho nllcg4llon In I tho complaint which states Iho causo V of action is ns follows V V That on time 2T lh dny of April 1000 tIme defendant was lie owner and publisher of a newspaper called the Salt Lake Herald Her-ald which said newspaper has an office and a goneral circulation In I said Weber county and thai fald defendant on the dav and year last aforesaId published In maid newHiwper lo wit tho Suit Lake Herald time following words concerning tho plaintiff Erroneous Appraisement Report In 11111 Estate alleged lo bo incorrect Incor-rect A xomcwhnl sonsaltonal document was filed In the District court ycsterdny In the mutter of the oelalo of Robert J II111 donascd II way filed by Thomas V Maloney nnd Richards Allison In lie half of a number of dovs > eci under the will whoso names arc nol mentioned and alleges that the Inventory and appraisement appraise-ment Is grossly Incorrect and Incomplete It charges that the real estate Is appraised ap-praised at JoTJA when In ruth I and In fact the samo has brett offered for sale al MfjOO and could not bo disposed of and that It Is nsneMsed at hut 2101 But the sensational part of the Instrument Js IJib charge that a largo number assets ag grcgallng 120219 and which are sol out In full wero never roporled lo the court Of this amount 1072 Is alleged to be due from Fred A Shlells one of the executors execu-tors for money recfelved from collections and otherwise VV Thist the defendant m anl thereby ihat the duly appointed appraisers of the prop cry of the deceased to wit the ippral > ers A A AVvngor James Plngroe and Albert Hlclu y had conaplrcd together to Injure the property of said estate and the assets thereof und to commit perjury as lo the value of said property and to defraud tilt estate therooutof and that I said plaintiff Imd stolen V and embezzled money and property of and belonging lo said estate and had perjured himself and defrauded sflld estate Thai said publication wits and IK falsa ana grejttl alarmed plaintiffs bondsmen pnd othcwlru Injured and aggrieved plaintiff V Tho complaint was propnrml yesterday by Mr Shlellas attorney George MeCor mlck who slated that a simmons had been rent to Salt Lithe Oily lo l bo orvod on lie defendant V V V As tn the controversy It was slated yesterday hat some party or parties wore pursuing Mr Slilolls with venom to vre ik out on him ft pernonal spite u will bo remembered that when Mr iIIUii will was opened some time ago Mr Shlells and Rev W K Mnlson rector of the KplswopHl Church of HIM Good Shep herd were namwl < IK ex cuu > rs and that both qualified that later iwo of Mr ShlMIss bondsman auked to tx relonppd V and that they were released ihreo new I bon Nmcn being substituted by tlr I Shlclln Then that later the petition by I tho attorney mimed wits filed In court I tho publication of which Is the foundation I of the above action Tlu > gin of the action ac-tion a > stinted ywUerdav by Mr McCor mick Ir I that tho petition In tine estate I did nol disclose the numee of tim petitioner I peti-tioner or HIM rcal parties in Intercut and I consequently wa flat a public document I tiled In court within the meaning of tho I I HtHtUttl t Mr Shlell sayti that Ms former bondn i men were approached by nmio Party to him unknown who ijald to the bondmen that If they dId not V withdraw from time f bond they would setter in their trnile Mr I t SMell Mlao iwyn that two of hum present bondsmen hay b cii requeued to wlih I draw from tim bonJ aui has been thremteiiiHl with Jo4 of trflde If they did I not withdraw and that In tho CUSP of I on of the bomlamcn trade has been with 1 draWn ulrewdy V I Mr Shiells and his atorpcv suvtlmt laht1er suits or criminal actions for sm F ulr will be commenced HKainut other par led within a few days they clalmlis I Uuit Mr ShlcU hne len tlW6cLcrt lo syis I tmatlc pcwijcutlon by censorial eniimie Th affair throughout has mlrrwlTip a I lan amount of rurlovlty and Intrrr t I unong iho f who claim to know an1 thlin of ih V fn t VV V of tl vhol I V mti r r II i V usa rtood that thn iiM of aura rons and i complaint was mado bum VLhOV lliHald management Salt V Jab CIty vsterdnV afternoon |