Show BIG o CAPACITY FOR BEER 1t Bischoff Says He Can Swallow tt Swal-low 200 Glasses a Day AND BE PERFECTLY SOBER His FellowEmployees do not Believe that BischofZ was Fairly Treated in 1 Being Discharged from Brewery Because He Got a Load of Iimo by f Breaking in a Door When He was Ordered So to Do by His i Superior 1 Officer Capacity of Brewers for Beer Again Discussed Ag1 I The Board of Labor Conciliation and Arbitration was In session again yes torday afternoon and last evening In the ease of the Salt Lake Brewing company com-pany and Charles Blschoff the latter ilnlmlni to have boon unlawfully discharged dis-charged from the employ of the company I com-pany by the foreman Oscar Lehman The brewery people having gotten in all their testimony on the day previous yesterday was devoted to the defense j and last evening the arguments were I 4 ninth by Joseph Jjlppman for the brew i try and C S VarIan for Blschoff After the board had discussed the J testimony for a few moments It decided testmon 1 cided to ask until Monday next befpre rendering n decision as Col E A Wall I was called out of town for a short llrno and there wore several matters I that they would like time to consider In consideration of the fact that the j law allows the board three weeks In I whlfh to arrive at a decision the reo nnebt a a very reasonable one and i the dVision will b rendered on Mon I q 1j 1 j c7 3iscbof W x w1 1 7 T W > k toubt ri sFfl 1 FC 4fl A I cN ii it r 111 I 1 f 1 Y I I iMI I I f 4 4f A7 S 7 tk1mAr t crrc nIjtctr ei mUc Ae ki Jnr MtOi day next unless Col Wall falls to get bark In time The testimony of yesterday was given by Charles Hoffman who is president nf the Brewers union Charles Lark a fellow workman Fritz Springman the Hceretary or the association and Biscb oT himself KBCl MAKICTU TUB FULL MAN Hoffman charged that the real cause of the discharge of Dlfchoft was that ho had entered through the window tn the quest of that now noted load of I lime and when he had said to the man ager of the brewery that such an excuse ex-cuse wan very trivial and ought not to be considered Foreman Lehman had Saul there were other charges that he could have made had he desired and then It was that It WM alleged that BlKchoff had been carrying something else than lime Blschoff had asked Lehman at that time why 1 it were true that ho had been full on the dates named he lad not discharged him at the time he was found to be Cull or at leiiHt unl him home but he lUll received re-ceived no satisfactory answer Leh mans reply wan that he had overlooked over-looked It SOBER IF HE COULD WORK Lehman did not say that BlsehofC lUll been t discharged for being Intoxl eated but because of the shutter business t bus-iness Hoffman was of the opinion lb that the dlseluirge of the defendant was not according to tho terms agreed upon Aa to I man being drunk the witness did not think that It had anything too u to-o with how much beer he had drank during tho day and an long ns ho could dy his work reasonably well he would not consider that he was full within the meaning of the term as employed in brewing circles 0 At the Instance of Mr Daveler tho witness then went on tu tell what ho considered the powers of the union were In case n strike was deemed nec S Mjsary His udmlaaloiiH showed that he considered tho union had a right AT to order n strike without giving the chance to be heard 13 brewing company f LAHlv ON LAUKS Charles Lark another employee of S the brewery Maid he did not consider that under the rules of the union their the-ir lurenmn hud nny right to discharge niwhoff and lit did not believe that he i WH drunk art alleged I was bin duty u foreman of the cellar to report J re-port to the foreman of the entire brew rry Htich men as were found drunk hut hu had who hutlu never sein any men 1d wrre drunk enough to guarantee such r Htllon on his part Junt how full r man would have to h l e to make him cull u 1h j < attention of the foreman to tho 1f fact ho could not nay As foreman uC i Ow cellar nnI I the man In ne < d of tin linn his lund ordered liluchoff to get a the deodorizer 1C ho lund to go through u the window fo I Dlschult was not drunk but lio might have been highly Htlmulnted Ho did not > believe he was any full IT limn usual on the p lO it1 kites cuinplalm d 1 of Thu fnct that lutk J lui I I L I s ii t IJ I 0 s J temporary fureilis I In the U Rsiei of Lehman rs IJhC Iln au v ia brought out Ulld I during that time Lark had employed Blschoff who had been discharged by Lehman before he left There hud bci I no complaint made by I thj brewery bosses on that account and 8 far asS as-S lu > know there was no animosity j against Blschoff because the date of J his reemployment was over thrj I years ago and he had never been treated nave as an equal with all of the other employers Aa to how many I glasses of hecr a man could take with Impunity In u day the witness thought ho could easily I stow away anywhere I from fifteen to twenty may bf more AVFLL1NC TO BE AX EXPERT At this point Hoffman offered himself as an expert witness on the capacity of a brewer l for beer but he was sqiiehhed by Vnrlan Lark said It was not uncommon for Die brewers to get a lIttle too much beer but that was a matter that did not cause an scandal any or comment union them amonS Fritx Springman the secretary of the union pave similar testimony and then he was followed by Blachoff him I self who said he believed that he had been unjustly discharged and It was not for being drunk but for the going i through of thc door which his superior I r I In the brewery Lark i had ordered him to do Tho charge of drunkenness he 1 1 opined was an after consideration On nfer congldtTnton I V tho other hand and when under cross f examination he admitted that Fore man Lehman had never shown f any an imosity toward him even when he had found him back at his old post after I he had returned from his vacation I and he had treated him kindly since t that time Ho denied that he had been 4 drunk on the dates In question or so much under tho Inlluence of beer that he way unable to do jile worl In a proper manner AN ENORMOUS CAPACITY I As to the amount of beer that a man I 0 can drink without feeling its effects he l did not care to form an opinion The I glasses used In the brewery were of a I medium she and as the beer was usually fresh l goodly portion of II was i i foam Seven years ago he had tried I < to discover how much he could drink Iln I a day and he believed he had broken the record It I was Blschoffs actual belief that he might reach foi his two I i hundredth glass In a day without be 1 lug seriously Incommoded The witnesses nesses who had said that he was under f I un-der the Influence of beer on certain I dates might have been slightly excited themselves Hc had told Lqhman that I 1 hud he been drunk he could have discharged dis-charged him and he would never have said < word but he had asked n saying i say-ing clause to the effect that he was not drunk on the dates named I |