Show r MR STRAUPS ARGUMENT < Legal Aspects Dwelt on in Opening Speech for Defense the argument Straup opened D N L k or the defense when court assembled and spoke un it 9CO in the morning of 11 the noon recess In the course remarks he called the at ils opening to the slight error H cntlon of the Jury argument the event Cotts Mr Van 4 n before when Van Colt slightly al t ig Mlllas replies Mr of Capt red one confined hb argument almost miup holly to the legal aspect of the case Thursday even fd VaIL Cott on if ld Mr counsel for said that COli Straup Mr g E had stated that ho hud c prosecution deliberate 111111 of a more 1ver heard aside for the tlloment the h I r Laying anll physIcal weak mentnl o IcsUon of heto Is the said MI 8traup the its planning the 81gn In this case Bad it IJ1Cfi premcdI p ng In watt havc chocu IL led Mills would not fcllc place to do the deed JUSTIFIABLE KILLING i prosecution shown Where has the You cannot c evidence of malice mere act of In t hr malice from the of the law Omcer3 ttlonal Itl11lng thlough In V i conYlcted criminals arc not mur the officers ttlon yet causes mo must look Into I irS You there wns flflY CX If I tts ascertain I the defend any justification 08 sane aM any u In this case were box he would I In that wou sitting killing this In 111 been justilled m1lst fInd dcUb o Ibid malice which ou I believe you co IntentiOn that the man do In this case not heart Now gentle 11 a malignant cOUflBCl may stand 11 or the jury doomsday ut i 1 and argue until ou that this 1i not convince L1 could one any mall been II whose lire has every act l1aa wit be proud of whOHC hall ever fLU h that or a gcnUcmllll hu until that d U In hit life WblHl Pcd momlul Strnup 5LII ntlnulnS Mr or lhc Jury 110 oW scntlemen the case I have n11 for the law In whnl I consider tr to explain to yet I |