OCR Text |
Show " MISFITS. The Unhappy Wives Appeal to the Courts 4. TO CORRECT BLUNDERS OF THAT SV7FFT RHV OIlDin Mrs. Hea?ren, Mrs. Fitzgerald and Mrs. Griffin, the Plaintiffs. CRUEL TREATMENT IS ALLEGED IN EACH CASE. Judge Zane Will Wot Hold Court JAarain This Week-Judge Ander-',' Ander-',' Ma st Work on the Law and Motion Mo-tion Calendar Judgment! Entered Today in the Third IMstrict Court Siew Actions Commenced Pro-eate Pro-eate Proceedings Kotes. A trio of unhappy wives this morning appealed ap-pealed to the Third district court to be re-lieTed re-lieTed from the matrimonial yoke. The first was Elisabeth Heagreu, who in 1872, was married In this city to Henry J. Heagren. It did not take the defendant long to discover that Cupid had made a blunder, and she alleges al-leges in her complaint that her entire married mar-ried life, . and particularly during the past five years, her husband has treated her cruelly. Heagren used to run a lunch staud in a saloon, and his wife states that on one occasion while she was in his place, the defendant de-fendant knocked her down and otherwise Hl1ftA 1l fin fi.nt.mk.. OK 1 -1 V, - at her rooms, No 643 South Fifth West street, and abused her cruelly. For this last offense of-fense he was placed under bonds. She asks for an absolute decree of divorce and for the custody of her children. Kaighn fc Anderson are the plaintiffs attorneys. at-torneys. .... - . Dalla Fitzgerald's Tal of Woe. Bella Fitzgerald has brought suit for divorce against Michael Fitzgerald, the well-known well-known proprietor of the -Mirror saloon, on Main street. The plaintiff alleges that while she has always demeaned herself to the defendant de-fendant as a good, kind and 'loving wife, he has disregarded his mat riage - vows, and for three years past has abused and mistreated her, until life has become a burden to her. In December last she brought suit for a dissolution dis-solution of the bonds of matrimony, but was persuaded by hint to withdraw the action on Lis pJt.ies i do better in the future. He then feui r cruel treatment-of Tier; often coil) jSq &er to leave his home and fo to he .er's or to neighbors in the ead hour oj.;.ight to escape his violence. As instances of his cruelty, she recites that when her youngest child was but ten days old he struck her and pulled her hair. On October 6 last he again struck her and pulled her hair. Plaintiff goes on to recite many similar instances and says that while she is a frail, delicate woman the defendant is a large man and a pugilist. He is addicted to the use of liquor and often returns home at night drunk; that at the time of his marriage mar-riage the defendant had scarcely any property, prop-erty, but Is now worth at least $16,000, and has a steady income from his saloon and real property. She asks for an absolute decree of divorce, for. the custody of her children and for alimony. J. A. Williams is the plaintiff's attorney. Mr. Fitzgerald says there are two sides to this story, and his will come when his answer is filed. He says that the allegations of cruelty are utterly false, and parties who are in a position to know, say that he ha treated his wife with every consideration. Incompatibility of temperment seems to be the whole trouble in this case. Griflln vs. Griffin, Floy B. Griffin has instituted divorce pro- ceedings against dames r. urimn. lhe parties par-ties were married at Butte on March 10, 18'J2, but the defendant failed to provide for hit bride, and she was often compelled to appeal to her parents for support. Besides this, he has treated her cruelly. She asks for an absolute ab-solute decree of divorce and that she be restored to her maiden name, Floy B. Oglesby. f For an Accounting. James H. McEnigbt today brought suit against Connors Bros, of Stockton. He alleges al-leges that in the year 1SS6 he opened an account ac-count with the defendant which was never settled and liquidated. He asks for an accounting ac-counting and for judgment in the sum of I1TOS.76. J. H. Harris is the plaintiffs attorney. Court Motes. Judge Zano's court will not be in session again until next Monday, when civil business busi-ness will be taken up. In the case of Clark, Eldredge & Co. vs. W. Douglas, judgment has been entered for the plaintiff for $547.56. Judgment has been entered for the plaintiff plain-tiff for $389.30 in the caso of the Utah National Na-tional Bank vs. N. II. Groesbeck. In the case of the Co-op. Furniture Co. vs. Lizzie A. Hutchinson, judgment has been entered for the plaintiff f or 3344.6G. |