Show THEY MUST hust all UKE the church organ argon again returned last jut night to its mendacious auls nil quotation of till tile law inn la in respect to the requirement that incumbent officials shall not hold boll i tilla it the oath cathi it teresea to quote the clause ot of the hi in law 4 bearing on the ewe cue but quotes instead that clauso clause which requires the tbt officers to tako jako the oath as aab a condition debt to ollan As to that part of it we expressly said in tile tho first place there was no question uc atlon i ot of course core will be required hereafter to tike take tho the anth before entering upon thoon tio ot of office but we say now as an before that as regards regard 8 tie the present case the requirement upon incumbent officials to tale take this oath tho law expressly avoids tiny any condit condition loa precedent or any they word that mould ta lii tiny any way complicate Om PlicatO the matter and says squarely that no person shall be entitled to hold any office ot of trust or emolument in said territory who shall not have hare taken tho the oath or affirmation aforesaid this cornea comes la in it a sentence Een teace by itself voters and jurors being iti in eluded jut in it after tho the condition precedent clause has been altogether got through with and passed A complete sentence intervenes bs be that clause and tho the ono wo we quote tho the Jf tra argument Is that officers need not take this new oath because they had fully qualified under the old law but SO eo had tho the grand and petit j jurors brors odthe first anti and third district courts yet they were veis all required to toko take tho the now oath as an additional qualification to that required ol of them under the former statutes tit the same earno sentence which provides that persons persona shall not be capable ot of jury gerilee without hall having ing taken this oath also says that officers shall not told without lying having taken it the langu language ago Is applied to voters jurors juron and office I 1 in one clause and declares none shall be qualified without taking tile alio oath the tha courts have already applied the law to their judges themselves anti anil other federal leavo taken it but it if tile tiie requirement la 13 latoni not ou all it was not on oa any tho the A cir falsely pretends to quote the law 1 it quote jho law of till tiie ease but another law which does not apply we might as well viell tryout to have the conalty provided in ia the law for murder applied to a culprit convicted ot of forgery org cry and ana insist that we were quoting the law as for or the to quote the law governing persons pariona about to enter upon office claiming therefore there toro that there was aa no law applicable applit able to present let it quote tho law of the cue case and not eyes ely and dishonestly suppress that and harp OR on something else els that has basi nothing to do with it the law Is the skulking chalking anti and dodging officials ciali should all be brought into court coart if they will not take fate the oath others ise and he be compelled to take the oath required by law or be declared disqualified and anil their positions lacata va cAtal wo we boilers there is a territorial st statute atille prescribing the method of filling such each vacancies etes and that it Is by appoldt t ament let the good and lawful work be pressed I 1 the matter Is tan la a fair way of being tested la ono one case at least in salem county on tile the a justice of the peace was waa challenged by an all attorney atto the was about to administer the oath to a jury when the attorney objected to him doing so until he had taken tile the oath himself him the justice pleaded his former qualification and overruled the objection abjection holding that congress Congro aa could not enact arland anand dit ional qualification to affect him during bis big torm term ot of office that lite ample authority tor for 11 him ire to do all acts pertaining to his oilier ace while LC he hold held it without anything further TheN the reports the case cam but does oot not garg the alia name of the justice wo we trust the attorn attorney OY may pre presa his objection and have a ruling at 0 the hirst first district court la in the promised what that rull ruling ag wilt will be there to is not dot much room for doubt make blake tho the anglers antlers qualify or bounce them hem I 1 |