Show A QUESTION or costs minor 0 ICv fd rea the h atoo idea AM aull it 1 when t be variant was are regard for abu tb arm barc of aurelius Aurel lui miner on a charge catro be try iry tre cr of tho the law him blin to bo be still ilu to 0 o lb be city abil tima 1 sea there it hi earchel ear ched 4 it til is two ao oscr or I 1 IV for tab I 1 b ehu nce A of duty anly t ty alay we waru aud b the chinch pali to B 5 al atan 1 I orea and n d rull L lu aaa dare afler or D coca of several in 0 calmi 1 be d lie T refaced e returned ing tc nilly is be ba had do r the larned rf of hu has TO re turn vl ural silt of big 16 1 6 alfo et riall ulm it it 1 it lu ainu nd it blue low tbt tb t inar l nn alldor bas to rory every trick sod budds to delay 10 lo the cars ed n at bt a d tho the court with bis big bedl ausna on OD na and only oily to 10 A trial boo big ba filibustering resource aces cra entirely aud arld DO port with the check rr far abbl which h ho o IH dolain J bo v j eels big ottom 0 cudjo 0 1 1 barak u i 0 tb charof dote t tbt J occurred court e 4 dudloff 6 u riot t ibo be pro cc miloica and bill to court ye jurgo dg at A id a t me on to a dick tio 0 coata 0 OL 4 ilia ground damrad ili tart 1 otcel Vers bad a I 1 P ora allm mr allol L wn V ili da it da mar e abal aaili offic hoaas sworn lie ho loell tied flad that alfito items under the head or of waft hals fee in the minor cau ra wrea correct but that some feet fees bai been overlooked ban tire bill was mado made out bud aad the mount amount be ba at mono TRAM trial TOK VILL HILL ju fudeo judeo aln hr r laces informed the court coari the t bo it did r d not DOS uk oak that that had bad boon 0 omitted be D added to the bill ol of costs but bill be ba stair earol of 0 the tb items should be off lie did not hot think th ihal a fees of before the orand grand jury u ry abound bo be included claiming that the p proM met c CUlloo u lion old did oot not unlit bout h bo I 1 d t cled lie ai objected X aleo to I 1 abo 0 potla jurors room neither as es it proper to 10 charge ceareo formy forbid forB iv I 1 OR sell n carld for wet before say pits pick jiul bad bee dicea catered lie ai ais alas objected of to the attorneys docket fm mr in ID bin big reply stated there wu was BO n 0 statute or talc ralo governing the abo tat lax maion of costs jn As a criminal coal too the statute tatu tc or of the authorized the court to impose the costs or the prate elution oil oa the bat do out not po city costs coola of the pro caJon tro era I 1 it t wu was that the fees feci of trial juror could not dot properly be ba taxed bared re H cou costs th tbt of c CK coin a oc sit with the bringing brio ging of tho th 0 ats we corn ba 1 fore ur s abo grand jury and aid thu the beof lt it roasts billow tb ili body wale ve therefore 1 re of the cost coa of abo be milon the to foe of the ibo adf for which hab mar alm as liable were also fa part of 1 home judge zane took look the question u bodor 1 I luand a if ha be decide to iho be costs coalby the ibe U which wu was gwilt oal ltd d ajom abu firt bill will perhaps bo be addal th the ald ion to I 1 ancor somi importance as it la ibo be dart court A will vat lay 1 7 dobo to 1 0 mom rulo rule fir ilia guidance of tho the oluf la in t texi tho the corts of criminal pro proceed onca tlona llon fl they have beo been obliged t aex acio their otro abo at ate them DO oa tho act |