Show A BOND bonds S it ill IB all tub took to lo to bo forever fever kt at odds oddo with it judge ud and we W wab it wo could vold it wo aro orry TUB and judge houter cannot afoo bettor but the frequency with which he bo la 18 overruled la in tho the higher courts irresistibly impala us to tho the belief that where there LJ b ft a diff mace of opinion as to to his action in ia wy any giglo came lio he is pretty certain to bo be wrong it Is with the dioro to chur saw that wo we join joia the general fietti meet brus community in n declaring that his ruling la in tho the cue case or of tho he la london cau 1 most moet c ex aad seemingly quito quite ou out of the limits of reason we only on A acor technicality which should not count ho holds that the statute intal the cila or of his bia court with dm dis cryllon in 14 filing tho the bond on 00 au at i ment came who alico the ho clerk liu has acted in the iho miller matter it is beyond uio the power of I 1 iho h a mutt coun to lo In torao and in creato arct tha iho a clodus or 11 hood to do fied th 1 tile ilie moni mom remark benm at b blo from the ibo ili ihal lomo amal day be to loro when liou this point wu wall upon the hio judge sold mid in ID a proper ud cm he would great i a motion 10 lor m ln in crimea crik ol of uio the bond ir if thel artam he had uld said this wu not at pro propst per c i when alic on hit his hint made tho the motion mollon for fco an in cream ho be would at t kut have been consistent might be brtva bom thought of his judgment lut but to turn mm squarely wood round bad and affirm that ibal he bo tied to no power to overrule hr his clerk cleric WM ic indeed deed ft a sur priss the district judge may iday correct toy my minor judicial trl tri bunal overfull over fula Justice sot alio panco correct probate odgry rod and upset po pa he hu has full power poster oter oct the records of ill own court ID ho can instruct his clock i ia tho matters call even ftp DP point or depose him at pleasure plew aro yet la in a simple ministerial duty devolved upon apon that dork clerk for convenience make lake boom be caa not tho the doctrine to us uc altogether preposterous it reekes make the clerk ft a oo co ordin sto brauch of the abo court and independent of ll it ft a petition po eltion no DO statute batuto could have DITO I 1 meant to oz fix if the ill a clerk is above tho me judge who she appoints and can delosto him it would bo be worth while to know whether bo be Is i so 0 o la in any other matters than la in his bis settlement of attachment bonds and icso in what whytt it hu has always been tho the common ing that wilbin his br tho the judge was w the highest judicial authors authority y but li it appears me such judge Is 1 ito will L H 19 1 9 to filide divide that responsibility and 1114 to lot eo up a higher tri burial thao boa liim him sel floom u to ODO function A 6 A lout but wo we doubt if cither either of tho the other judges would go with him in ID t this him or that it if ill they did it would be sound law the of ft a duty to an by ft a statute by no DO meant him cicle live in control independent of tho the cour court and it needs no posit loo statute to ex ci tenil tend iho jurisdiction of the iho court dyrr him either tho the doctrine Is ii certainly UD unsound SOund 80 and d w we aro lo 10 sec ii |