Show JURORS tile the house yea tev gabud a bill in provide let the mat of juran furor who aud alie district courts court and aro for enough to bt iraq oa no the trial jilma for taboo alio aro corn core polled to bu be brt tt but n to bo do not lisp bap pell to be drawn upon a trial jury no pay 16 1 ILC tho the bill therefore to a tied bid bill balli hod find des deserres no DO consideration whatever RI at the iha hands vt of tile mon men it 10 no not creo craft apparently ud and conan oa tha surfaces ao effort to local the ra c via of the situation end od provide go great m of knon aea being laff required to paw pass works of time in ID bd ca u upon pon C all com peni 1100 1 la 0 a I 1 tar a r u f the bill Is designed to bo be a re ill on priam litigation by making the cost lit jar trials 0 0 great that tow few I 1 odeeg could par them it would UR a lw law no doubt be entirely loo fur for the tb constitution of the bolted stake right of trill trial by jury in ID 11 ll cuu ir V here the um loren dollare t jars sod rod t there hes I 1 it t 1 u hoil and its lt immediate an d practical application hem thereto there no state constitution to lo lo in the least modify or thwart if f the ho right of a jury trial ia Is it competent for a territorial LUU loro to say ay that ahl it 11 shall lull DOI be bad except oa certain tala conditions we W thing pat but bat the on the contrary the guaranteed right Is to tw be exercised without any restriction whatever if the abd can put pat on oa a of this tb kind it can CAH put on olbin wo we th abat tha ekr at once fall on being tested it if a litigant should hould demand a jury md bud akol stood on lit bla right guaranteed by the Co refusing to PT pay ilia t pon P costs we that would settle the uv law coca for all and throw it II out of court but bat the idea film of jury trials la in the courts courll as long mB there bra are juries jaries Is I 1 tot not ft a good brood and ad any 07 attempt to do 60 0 o strikes a blow at long md and well veil settled olund budgis uniformly ro ink fuse to try without curlo cur cases la in matters matter of re fact C it kud and in ID so BO dolog they act witly I 1 y and nd according to well cul precedent it la Is not likely that lint they would willingly overturn turo that lant for the take 10 lo of validity of a law which foods laoda to throw the bor bar of trials of luc issues of fact no ca wll soot hof law upon themselves tod and at the same amo ame ac bay k barrier galust galant a citizens constitutional right to burr trial for la in spite of the intimations of soma BOOK orelli SATo cates of this thib bill it 01 those who follow the mining industry aro am oot not rich and it 11 a probable the vast majority of set tho the lulola on either side woula old rod 14 1 2 4 ft a day for foay jury a if not impossible lie do mood macl upon their flaa acca suppose shot alio there bere were a rich and A poor party to a sult crould jot dot the rich roan man every time deel declare ut bli to try the case willim P sole purpose of forcing ilia poor man to demand 11 anil and SO 0 O bo be pleased all the alio luder larder for money but buethe ilni bin bill provides for forsbe the ent a but out cut of twenty or thirty or more who mt be alu if the lave anything at C all tt do iuli aith the Jury they would woul ra malro met chouch it be u la in attan danco go i that the fould could anike a suitable selection of twelve to try their coupe CAURO it ir there to ll taine lit la the ibe idea bati arnould anould pay they should be inquired to py pay for ft a that tha ilia gurlt might bo be rightly constituted if fit it I 1 IB a private business husla ew this thing of keep I 1 log juror lit ia attendance on the courts private eriv to parties aboul bloum I be wide omec to oay coy for all kl nd ad not for only the ilia few who are ar retained A oil oa scale chec aad with hot mi loff fair ft man a demanding k S jury would RO go down oira 1 in his bl par to pay PAT jury ito bo might be satisfied contained one or two who acro dead sita lust lint bani from the marti Doc lAWIT if the person demand tog lo 10 the jury li it really their employer dd ad mut mu bikit t pay them he bo ought tj b ill able to discharge them at 1 kny any time setu ho be be cobic dissatisfied with uti their it further till the tha jury per dann bilm must munk b lit paid tu in rill nut once anco every dy day by ibe lb a orty demanding ilia ibo jury IP I P P e lio lie should tied flod the trial going hard laird till him bo be would cold no DO looker imager their vIcea lis bit refusal to pay stop th the cue there Is no a lon ta in tile biu bill that the other party parly might th abu step I 1 la and employ the ibo jury july discharged by if be former employer cro poyer lad ad thus keep on with the ibo edge caw on oa the tb contrary century the refusal or of ibo tit tint fint amplo or to pay steps top ilia ca ce fur be 1 I tile only person who dm amended ended atlo jury md it nobody 01 alc hall bu aay right to continue cautious it la in service is ii it probable in view of mi this ihl state at of albal that court art would old consent to 10 bakin a 6 jury trial at W ahn th ill case could old be loped stopped la in so 0 o ludicrous led emmr summer a manners tho th bill therefore Is wrong la in prin prim W 4 undertaking to so nod fillpos a do W veil e 11 established farm bud and modell or of t OCe dUrO told in fu theory as undertaking to so ao restrict and nd limit a right As to mk make it Is IB operative I 1 TV ott oa litigants as design C it to bluder ID an enforcement of 1 their legal rights right without exorbitant cast 74 aul odd absurd as within the power of a litigant to sum maruy close a trial which WAS wa to his liking sod and to do so ao la IQ a vi or y which to I 1 As absurd ap CODI Vali A bill baj like this we imagine stands but lit t 16 eb ca of becoming I 1 iw bar but I 1 if it wera cocle IQ it would thon than be too loo tooliah nod uv trifling killing to recluse receive iny any all considers elanio in a court of law this and aau impotent a arco tb juror luh lai 3 0 10 o precisely fir crile the amo condition ID MO tl of tuo the legislative session foiled faced it the reason why it could not be settled in 11 I a I way wait be becco of the invincible repugnance of the ilia leith let lutor 6 to meet it 11 la in tho the only felt fair fand oil effective way to lc which it could le he met by paying the jurors out of at tho the public aury the at the tb same earno time they make this orwell ray pay jorge UD note to various var louft commissioners in n the judicial dish hLf bc only dul dot is 1 to cut down 84 much as possible tile the sums jurors and twelve from fram it tn be territory and appropriate hum hua dred of 1 dollars dolann for log lecil ses which might bo be omitted emitted with vita much creator motor justice than the pal went of civil lurono it inis very much aft if them fj 15 to be ft completo complete allure in this mattor mattel slid ind with the iha legislature art an 11 the taa blame tepidity stupidity rod tury are triumphant nd ad they should not be b denied their jut just r aged reward word to la the of ka am outs out ared people |