| Show revelation I 1 I 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG COMES INTO COURT AND SWEARS HAS BUT ONE WIFE CELESTIAL MARRIAGE AND SOCIAL HARLOTRY IDENTICAL virtue tica aw aud and men if ustate or Atel ligion A wife in the state and concubines la in the church I 1 the of rod god on its L list last leav at fix jooa yoi lordy after nocia D ng iam am young feol abo subjoined sub joined ansiger to lo the complaint ol of LIS lia wife ann euza young win sues cues for divorce and bil mony in the tha third district conti it mill hill lo be observed that the prophet repudiate ll tho the bya tem of 0 polygamy deo declarer laras himself ike husband of 0 ono wife only sending the lal called of 00 ool I 1 to tho the dos doa we have not time lima tody to dy day to review this document oni ami comment on en the enil end of as s preached by the prophet for thirty years but bol in ia our next issue the ho readers of TUB tim tu EBU z will find us shaking up tuo the dead hambur with kith bands hero is tile ile 0 AD o feuola of calo calas concubinage b indge ja the district court coors thiril third judicial did of tho the territory of utah county of f IS sill isit it like alto ADO alz young by hor la dr dext friend B n mancu vs T brig huu nonoi not defendant An armr siver now comes the read defendant briglin young tonne and for or deliver to the bill of I win coin el plum 11 t ot of tho tha luj ann elit elam young plain hafl ff tile nit 34 k affa that oil OB tha th clith day of 0 april IMS it the county of salt bill llo ialo utah cub Tern Terr lory 7 or of a kt t my any other fluid aoi or place this ud aud the ibo uld id plaintiff infer warned or that since it time or at my any time tim the laid bocu bacu or that bat now to 1 the ibo lie ifo of thid defendant for slits oa idd and bolatin Ix bo iliof latif ft tint th t lloro before that tiou to wit on til le efe nelld ot at silt salt liko lake city utah territory Tern wry the ui ud laid plaintiff wu was married to one ja no 1 L UTO doe vi nho ho ad still living kad and that ever planes tile said teath beath day of A annl ani lbs the fali law hiu been eta adt ou on the said sixth dy day of april lia iru i nd still is the lie lawful wire wife of oi the mid ad janice L doe DM never as ai tent tau now and having b bo ta irom the saad james L dec I 1 but that bid defendant farther mau TB that on oa the sixth day of april 1668 aul gujt at the the cAre hereinafter referred to be h iu a 1 inform u formed td sad nd then ihra tenly belati ml sh s t 1 the h e plaintiff 1124 prior to olt time hoon y divorce from abo sald james L edw UYI says AS A is BUT and the further answering al 1 llague bit st it tho the town of cf kirtland kirklind Kirt lind in ID the biair 13 or of ullo oll oil OD the bo tooth dy daly of january A D 1831 this defendant lang then no an uni narried mm man was duly and lawfully lair fally flarried din alar tied ried to mary ann abgill liy by 1 of t tho b 0 GO oopal A P c 1 who h 0 ada t abou b kud tb or 0 b by uio the law of ifrid i d S an 1 oo 00 to bolma 0 1 0 a tan geia anti and the the iho said ini arriago waa KU then ind and th hero fally sod kod urt the eald muy mary ann ABC augell who Is still UN jog then and ud theral became md and ever banco had h been luil anti tiu till Is the ui lawful wife ifo of this defelic bat an of which ait mid fact 4 tho than bald cool com phania lat on tho the paid mid sigua dy day of liuti sus and for a 1 iong IOD timo time prior thereto hold full knowledge and TEX RELIC hut but defendant days that be baand and the said complainant wore on oa the april 1864 milliliters of the iho church of jesus 1 1 it ads of latter day baiato and that it was iru duct ft rIDO lad and belief of said kid church that woul beas thereof might rightfully enter into plural or celestial marriage anil deft ndoc adjusts that lint on tho the day of april efto it at sill salt lake city utah territory to in with and to the said doctrine custom tad and belief lof of alje duj church u performed to licatta tho the an I 1 defendant lava ta nhat hat lj is known u ruch peurl or 01 estoil marriage the find laid first am wife lf of this defendant being then living uj and as blila tiff tham land and botre well kaow ant dorund ant da deola tolls that aut on ill lie said id faith day of cf artl april or at att my any other time lo 10 and nd the iho aid paid P intermarried Inter married loony other or differ out iwaso or manner lima that oboy ada emitted and nd ut set forth defendant Defend int further farther ai 1 loges that the ho said complainant wu then informed by the ho faud thia ad a d thiro well knew knet that oy leatto n of 34 aid dmar vau ring in tho the madnor aforesaid roro otio obo could dot lave aud and aimed toot not ciplet t the ll 11 at soll L ay or personal atteo tiou of this u in ia the wife wire ardinary relation between husband md the bo said eald alleged with or it as slav tn other time commenced or funerals ton rd tile will said syme or kny y cour of neglect or larsina dead or or or at ital lumen or all thit it tilt amo timo or practical toor ards the ho ild eye ay iy or soy dy course of neglect or on aa liand nedis or or treatment ending in fit an absolute tt clulo lalith lr litH tiou of tier bar or other weel TUC air and till uxa buton the 16 thu this af k le ii tan that lo las hu had ill lwy ways and ud at 1 ill I I 1 time treated the isaid plaintiff with duo kinduch Lla kin doe duce and ad defendant alouies that during donds tho the year I 1 or it at any ny time ho be coulty allied tho the complainant against her williim or to remove it to ft a farm lo be longing to defendant four wiles mutt ll ci Y at cr to remove to koy any place gagnat I 1 ter wished 11 doola denies thit that during all that time or of uie time lane said ro re on it his total she wu was to perform or andr the th neco ol of ling njg menial services in ardor lu obtain tho the means of aulbi or lor for any PAW purdom ail to abit meade or tho the slid plaintiff may nur have had with her during dunas bar sojourn on the elud farm in ia lir lar com V t 1 0 u 6 is unable fi teto bat 1 h ho dalli tf that ho he etor pro pio billi taid far from rom having Irv iUn or forbade for Lade her ber to bare other or at diffut gut COMP with her bur her mothr mo thier denied bit lie ho did after tho ru othar of tho the ud aid lia tiff buc alue infirm ill lod unable to u ti to dead aid plaintiff tUf or kt at my any time object to louger r on oa the plu place u k companion or other wits to uio the plain doum thit that dulling lili life tiute anut to ibo mid form the rosland ho he treated with studied neglect or contempt or soy cuu cull or thu that lo bo gave her to la or that by h efte to lor last any cau to understand audere tead or infer idlor abit r as lili his were not ivr fur her but for or the ibo purpose of super nar tho the work oa an thu this farm but diford ing al boyll y lit at all such almu mud kud as al till ill othur other t gium tui be treated said rid with jall lloid d U it ckuj save bate to lor her as touch mach attention 68 wad with defendant 6 done UAL VAU md AND clorea cLo rei I 1 it cited kid aid from nor had ban he be given lit r uyi any 0 dip BUT OH defendant dicio chak plaintiff wu was con fralo eblo bolta ar or violence from robi the tha hostility or vinai curo at detonates defon duit to vacate aid V d boef v h va 1110 hile aba ha rodd redd tided there her 1 he 1 provided r I 1 hor her with av to alvo upon open sod md that h never ly word iron or otherwise tile give the plaintiff y reato realo on fear tar that havourd ho would theat bur bar with wida vio rio I 1 lacoco earo or thin than with kindo cale tied consideration drain tint inn to tn sail 81 like city fkr the he III fall of 1813 1873 he b hu wholly him alt from visit her at dont donno toile nc anat alla allem tm tile ftfe to I 1 w that hit during dorini said i time and rl during lut jut put before i the filing of tile complaint martin daffen dint dan I 1 d the uld plaintiff it at her dona oll all at t diff rent amr ud u as defend anid deficit dalbee would permit dairen DC fen deol adsitt that plaintiff las bu uld and did clad doring daring the year aforesaid frequently call all upon open him at another lion boudo occupied by him bun la in s kill it lake iko city and ad him bim to I 1 tanish article art or arr in dmn full lenders or the incur to procure thorn them but denies that la in answer to lor her slid soli solicitations citations or any ay of theta or at t any nr time be used towards bk bet and meet oOt language or opprobrious or offen ian lui KirKO ID ba this hu lb ill 0 ar ticket furn forn irli bad l na fail plaintiff by bj him bim since ali tile fall in and fur tier and of her nt children hot act avers that derlat a rildia of aid time and at t til all times until ull 11 left bid house in aforesaid fo rid he bo flare nailed hir air with ample clurtis to 0 o support barit ud and family defendant deal that bit d orta guld time or any ay put part thereof plate tit tiff was ir forced to do or was WAI city of doing oon tnt slant or manual labor in to procure tho the common Piar late of life 1110 for lier stIf lf and although defendant dalu that plaintiff may mi bare or necessarily performed soma omo labor ibri duri ing that time alo to la the 10 lo management of her d do affair nir LOVI A td jdant denies that hint plain tiff liu has fre or it at all 11 communicated to him or thil abs b bo ii or was amro of I 1 ilo 1110 fact that th the PL had lor for she ibo lut four acif or for fair koy any considerable part thereof Us acco A la a del want ica or of health biall li or that bit by reason thereof ales bo bad been or wu was during that on tiro tire period or mj any portion thereof it unable to perform a manual tit imbor it or in fa her ordinary dati daum staf firing pato or that ali she tio baa btty or wait vu in or aay ducker of diko or that bat sydor an anant bo an had id ID in 3 ad or any nood need or of ibo be orvices or advice of a physician or of edicio es or of food arop la to sach condi t tiomai itans dealt that at divers or any time lima or tun time iq in tho the throe fa 3 yin rearm I 1 lut last buforo tho the filing cling A of tho the complaint ite rein or th mandivil of defendant to procure for her bor the abo attendance or of a compel tent or uy lay physician or abai he bo hould famich tho the complainant with modi canes or food necessary lor for her ber aud and ro to her bar boblo condition or ill tint iad de ato liot t bu bad or hid had or at t my any time limo failed or refused to provide hir with either edical ed or medical attendance or proper fool food n or r tile thir mein means necessary or to obtain till llam in or that in con nence of any ny failure or of the defendant so 0 o to do plaint liff in 1168 bu been compelled to rely solely or tl at kli a on oa the ibo charity charily of but on the contrary mail iiii defendant avers that abat he b has br a if ways and at all 11 finite furnished her with all means to procure her suitable provisions and ad aca aitola modi ciOLi md and med cal c as be wu was she bo wu wait it at stay ny time la in need hoed ot of daula that id a the month of my may 1673 at t ball lako city or lit at toy any other time almo or place to formed plaintiff that be would world never actor abila in toy any makotar or to uj any extol cont contri contributor buto to her support lor or that the must moat theace forth rely solely oldy on her own exertions for her bor leacia or that of her bor children nut but on 00 the contrary thu this defendant avers that since that time lioio defendant hr hall tor for her means macur of subsistence and od otter odor that time baid until she loft left it so aforesaid bo be tarnished ornu hol her with willi a good food dwelling house to rondo la in aarow biow I 1 t days that he bo has bu no knowledge inform alion or IK auf lief ad to pita being balog compelled to ull sell at a crill uch furni taro if there wu was any much as she ho claims to here have owned purchased paro hwd or bad ad given to 0 o tier her or uy any furniture or aruches to lo procure means to support herself lad and children cli ildren at that tbt ob wu was not so 10 to do tad and that bit thiro wu wad no for her ber doing moat any time between the ibo sixth day of april tho the limo of alm lie 9 at marriage laur ligo of plain tiff with this d md lad the time when plaintiff left defendants house hom as aforesaid on or bout about the tha dy day of july IM 1873 defendant deates that bit he ha land hu or kid had for a period of more than ono one year or tor for my any ilmo iline before the illing of tho the bill of complaint herein wilfully or without CUM cause do ailed tiff or of from bar looie lr 71 or that hit lo be had desor led her it at 8 nil H defendant donics that by tawa or la in condis of any act or acts of dorcos ont ank or of any treatment or neglect of plain U by dorca daut either cither la in the nature dituro of the pretended cruel or inhuman treatment iu in the complaint mot kik forth or for my any deg lat bJ cruel aruel or treatment of of all lay kind d d cannot live la in md and union tOg ther or that by or la in thoret tho roof of or the ibo alfue of father of thorn them A tion lion denies on information and belief that the sum lam of twenty thousand dollars or toy any sum nm abr r would boa bo too foe for the abo s solicitors lad counsel in asserting her pro handed aeral or equitable rights growing out ont or of said aid alleged defendant that one ODO thousand thoi irad dollar dolian or tiny other sum lum exceeding one boa baa aired dollars collm per month would bo be A reasonable blo allowances to the ov 4 it if do de fain fondant dant wu was under toy legal obligation to 0 o provide tor for the iho maintenance nanco od and proper medical of uld id roff plain ff add d hur her chi children larea daring bid hi litiza liona to veto TO I 1 thal h he is 1 or had boon wealth amounting to benl null iOD of dollars or 01 that th bo be tit bi or hm has boon in the monthly receipt from hu has property of forty thousand dollars dollan or moro more on oa the contrary kry defendant that to bid bad baitt knowledge ru lation aill idd holiff ill all hl his pro bukea ell together dot does exceed in fa alo the um an of nix handron thousand dollars and that his gross income from all ja of bis bid property ud lod ta rr dorco don does not exceed six fix thol sad do dullart Z are per ninth farther uy days that bat at at tho the time limo mid allo gaid mar madriago riago this ihn defendant had bad and od still las hu a very tory largo faintly thit that his bm fetney now of 0 exly sixty three pere orid all of whom are re dependent upon this for mul denance and ad no op port 0 r P h h hereof f the dad prey judgment of the court thit hat he bobo I 1 be hence dismissed irith his oats heroin A clims slims sod idd A i attorneys All oraey TeaI TORT or udall county of salt bill like lako I 1 brigham young being daly sworn on D hu hid oath yo that ho be has bu heard rod read the and knows kaow and understands tenda tho the ovit tents thereof thorolf tho roof md and that the wao me is truo true of him bu own owa knowledge except chosta matters therein themia 9 bated on had bu I 1 kioa ud andu lod u to abow matter she bo I 1 toliO ves Tc it to 0 o bo fro tnie dimact further MT to thit that he bo 1 is me iho defending to ia the abobo cabil ed suit md lad naoni to wore before toe pie this kill day of august 1874 jos joi 1 F clerk I 1 |
