Show RIS luef HIS SUIT va anted raylor to pay for his opinion OSEPH ph WILLIAM WILLIA 51 REFUSED 11 ded 1 in au an interesting Interest lne trial of tho the caa s i before a tury jury in commission sar anu ners court said he I 1 border a the opinion and the tury jury round nd for the defendant stewart assid grice guilty of bur burglary glary i new and nd then the minor tribunals above the undulating of justice itlie rise larceny larcen cases and the ot of petit tie I 1 1 gee ae atlon cution of unfortunate I 1 violate the rams came he 1 at 1 and nd sit bit in judgment upon actions solving 1 toe important questions of 0 law a fact I 1 I 1 S itch i was jhc thc cain commissioner thees ers cult c nil t 1 3 berday afternoon I 1 I 1 n col ai gboree orge norris rail read promoter and attorney tto nicY lato late 0 of I 1 rm 1 I 1 I in delp clpola hlis and N st and lor th undertaker jc ase 1 ph i to I 1 his f elev mat me t I 1 in the judicial arena batth tit over it a claim of which 0 norris rals had pr s rated to mr tay 21 for alleged aceil orvices B rendered T he opinion lit antro easy was upon the qu i tion lion oi whether vi ther or not the alier of it a city lot who discovered A 41 mine alne upon his hi premises could folie tw the i in under the surface ot of ad decent tola lots belonging to other persons col norris it 11 aar apr aad had prepared ch an in opinion for or mr taylor and I 1 pon mr taylors T alors refusal to pay 60 r it on the ground that he never orand erea want ant it col norris I 1 him im tor for aloo I 1 P J daly DAIY war vi ar chind behind col norris i hills A V talor tailor ind rid D higgins ere in i the defend defendants antl corner i hen n time ma w a called by commas iner sommer Som nier george D shell wll so mccu n W it white while august fill W T dartie barbe e and S E smith I 1 I 1 and sworn as aa jurors the card caf and the hearing was orto tred proc i d it was is then that W M white who Is her of the murray american and learned amad from experience that a I 1 altar in the hand Is worth 2 upon broks alone from the el and demanded its ills fees in ad the other jurors followed mr ites 8 example and as an it was mr alor who had asked tor for a jury he exposited epo sited ed with the court a sum suino tit to pay the jurors cr their ser cr lom col norris then took the viand stand and signed fl that he bf wit waa admitted to pra fronts in philadelphia in issa from fl adelphis iphia he went to washington C rh nh re he be false also practiced he arn tred in calt alc lake over ever two i ago and rooms in the lor block on th morning of 0 mcp lath mr taylor called him into private ivanc onice office and excitedly in nihed him that he had bad discovered a mint ina in the cellar of one of his as ses this ahlf startling declaration was flowed d by a query as to whether or t he could follow the vein under ad nt lots belonging to his neighbors told him said ald col norris that e question illon was new nev to me but that would d look it up and give him an all anlon I 1 did to lo and delivered an opan a in riling thi the tamo sarno day payment refused used and I 1 instituted suit col norris was waa then questioned by higgins iggins for the as aa fol foli lill higgins how long lone have you a in i th flat city col norris morris about three months are you vou practicing now bot regularly I 1 am engaged in saing pursuits allme e you ever practiced law since our emission admission T e a I 1 practiced in both philadelphia d washington tell art ar an expert in mining law I 1 eburne ie 11 sm a not I 1 am a philadelphia law laughter prior ir to this case have you ever yen in an on mining matters 1 I favl how long have bate you known mr tay V ever r since I 1 came here eighty days 0 today lay haac n you been intimate him pairly aly so nal mr air taylor call you into hla his ce yes what at did you say when he be asked on for T an opinion aIlon 11 told M him I 1 could not answer off d we always alays give written till in i the east DO you remember that mr BIT taylor d you ou that h brother was an ati orney and that he could get all tho the he be want al from him no 11 I 1 cant jr member everything I 1 al ite te a buny ausy man I 1 nt you tell mr taylor that the a rt would out not cost bortt him a cent 1 I did II 11 not I 1 dont work tor for noth 11 nt he be tell you that you it 1116 i malt r up tor for him H 0 al did d riot not I 1 oil that hut tile the bill presented prem anted ly by ou to ad mr r talor tai I 1 or was for 0 while sit it V f hi tv v do you account t r t fletr r pant pan i 11 as he ray pay the bill as filed ltd I 1 thou thought ht I 1 had a right to e him m tor for a larr amount d th opinion he be es i I 1 found n it in mi room r C jon charles barles balda in and tt wre w re rf then sworn as t ui n th matter er of the value u vie and r d r ion on thought that hlll would be lease lon n alil ti f under tile hie circum tons as an outlined by the plaintiff mr if W ill arnolt and zia mr baldwin re it th ill dm arts to mind ind 7 I 1 at lili airm the pla plaintiff rested his I 1 slid 8 a 8 for the defense I 1 1 last lh willaam ivil llam taylor the defendi I 1 kestli all d that col norris had re I 1 4 ben tn mth ith lall hl root roof for nearly three nil IT ll 11 I 1 4 the morning of september lath I 1 norris arrit came into his onice end and tang r a 9 fineral conversation he said I 1 I 1 the C lonel Sui por I 1 had a coal at on n lot in thi ahli ity could I 1 toll foil the icv j in under my neighbors lot a colon 1 lid ild that he could not J s the th tion b hut u I 1 that he would it renn enatt enn tt marahall bradley his ani atz aboul N it was mas also very ch ltd and said that he could I 1 ab of dolhar lol Lira 5 w with ith which to valola P a coal thin 1 I told him 4 r ill li tt it I 1 want 4 0 opinion ion and that I 1 have any P mial I 1 al told him that my Y ther W w a 1 w r and that lie he st at aided to ill dl to 1 li al a auf but when aurnt irnia 4 to td rat nii 0 olllie that at afternoon arter nonn 1 found 1 th pinion aal th the bill col s in in it ut ahr same time I 1 i told hlin him that thai I 1 hi asked for 0 union allon and v ant it halt H tied a to tak fait it ho conever hoKo never vrr and said be ne ant 0 a 4 ch ap man later I 1 tile e al in hin hl room it 1 ill a refer refe as n to it tin ic 33 3 credit upon 11 bill 1 mr lid ild that lie had t 11 i that arn ami ia tn norris who told y 1 at I I 1 he h bald 11 n gambling and 1 ot of his hl p kt k t mony erea cal mr 11 taylor aylor im 1 l that h om catill i 1 cal mill it 8 t uses ne a of t the nv tion with wor nor f UP at aral n oth mothr r time ao as r hiatus F illand aland testified that jai 0 mr norrill lold her 1 to the lie rend ot of 1 the I ca ion that taylor was a farmer an and that lie would mould dump him anat tor for sixty plunks laugh ter I 1 mr daly daily moved that this testimony he IT c k as 0 out u 3 irrelevant but sir mr e to taylor y ter contended n add ad d that it should stand r c expect r to show allow mr bit ta alor added ill thai this la in a oklia gamo game from start to finish tah motion to strike out was then overruled miss MAY 11 skelton testified 1 ahat h nor 4 0 lr aels ri told 0 o d her sst that he was the fa first r palla r h 1 1 del llila i lla lawyer ll llwyn who had ever come to K salt alt lake and I 1 that bat lie he would soon own the town john littlefair an employee of sir mr ta tailor ter corroborated that gentleman a testimony and col norris was mas called tn tit arb rebuttal the colonel reiterated tile hla former statement to the effect that lie was wag regu luilly employed by MrA aylor to look the matter up and baid added that lie he come to salt lake to practice a law lie ile further said that lie he was occupied in building railroads and running for the united states slates senate and dlan t have time to think of sir air taylor and its his birther bi other all the time lime as they were not in his class I 1 suppose you associate with such men no as C P huntington sir fr higgins higi asked 1 I 1 do the witness al answered doth both sides rested at this time and the case was argued and submitted to the jury after some deliberation the jury returned a verdict for or the defendant mr taylor atwood estate suit the action of florence atwood by h her or mother and guardian amelia A sutton to decoi er one fourth of the estate of mellen n atwood deceased was waa taken up before judge merrila yesterday miss dallas atwood u who he Is lust just budding into womanhood began action in the probate couil at the time of 0 the filing of mr atwoods will asking for a distributive tribu tive portion of the estate as aa an heir alleging that she was wan a daughter of the deceased decease d by a plural wife her petition was denied and the will which w aich did riot not mention her as ai a legatee or otherwise was admitted to pro probate bate she then took an appeal to the third district court tile the estate Is quite valuable and houll I 1 miss atwood alwood prevail she we would u id possess about as her ter share she contends that the failure to make a b bequest to her was tin an oa oversight er sight while h 1 I 1 aher opponents claim that it i was as intentional and that the girl Is not entitled to any portion of the estate they also deny that she Is atwoods daughter brown henderson appear for miss atwood and richards richards and J H moyle appear lor for the estate the hearing was not concluded yesterday and u will ill be resumed this morning minor court matters david argall was arrested by deputy sheriff montgomery 3 esterday cst erday on the charge of having injured and destroyed a merry so go round belonging to michael richards by taking away ci 4 screw and block gave bonds for his aphea appearance T a race before commissioner sommer t today 0 and nas mas released L J droubay under indictment for grand larceny was arraigned in the tha third district court yesterday and entered a plea of 0 not guilty round guilty of burglary henry stewart wart under indictment for burglarizing burglarising burgl arising the store of R H eardley cardley on december 11 1894 was wag tried before judge bartch 5 eatter day the case reached the jury at 6 30 in tho the afternoon and fifteen minutes later I 1 they returned a verdict of guilty I 1 I 1 iho case of sam grice charged with burglary was visa resumed before judged judge bartch yesterday and reached the jury at 12 ocl ocIL shortly alter a verdict I 1 I 1 of guilty was aas returned and sentence sen was set for or october tho the charge of grand larceny against grice was continued tor for the term I 1 court 11 notes cates the indictment against J E D obrien for forgery was dismissed by assistant united states attorney howat yes yester ter I 1 day in the interest of the furtherance of justice obrien was charged with forging judge Powers 8 name naino to a check tor for a small amount A jury was Im paneled in judge bartchy hs court late yesterday afternoon to try andrew J headrick who nho Is charged with assaulting charles hamilton with a knife on august 11 isma with intent to do bodily harm the taking of testimony will begin this morning I 1 in the case of edward T singer vs the salt lake city copper manufacturing company et al defendants A hanauer and stephen A harrison have tiled cross complaint in which they demand judgment as follows in falor of stephen A harrison tor for 68 otto alman Sl 2200 andrew salts saks ct al L L D S W peck harriet L L green 2 edward T singer the amounts are alleged to be secured by a trust deed upon various mining claims in box elder county and upon the real estate owned by the tha copper plant company in this city george A lowe Is suing benjamin T lloyd et al to co collect I 1 I 1 act 50 on a promissory note secured by a mortgage short orders edward T singer vs salt lake city copper turing company et al A hanauer and S A harrison granted leave to file it a cross complaint bothwell JIe mcconaughy Conaughy vs v archie braim et al death of chanies england suggested and case came continued george M scott co s ill highland bland mining company ot ct al al dismissed 1 sm t as to L K E holders holden and judgment in flavor favor of plaintiffs lydia C U trumbo vs old jordan and galena mining company dismissed taylor It homney onaney armstrong Armm rong company s prussian na national t tonal insurance company order made setting aside entry of clerk sustaining demurrer and demurrer dr overruled martin lartin Is lenzi lenil v vs F S hadra motion for new trial overruled frank thompson of et al vs C L hamilton et al judgment in 1 favor of 11 plaintiff lat with 1250 attorneys tee fee peter dark clark of pork park city cl charged arged with murder in the first degree tor 4 or the killing of henry R nugent entered it a plea of not guilty in the third district court yesterday Oest erday |