Show The Marriage l Problem Dy By n W 1 L GEORGE CEORGE The Til rut last article written by y 7 the 1 I t te I or 01 o C rt Marriage f Will frill ill Neither Endure Endur Nor Disappear RE worst of or discussion Is that most people see sec everything e In blac black or In white When the fu- fu fu future tare ture of ot marriage occupies the con conversation yon you find one side saying that very soon there will be no mar mar- tinge e at nt all antI and that we shall aU all live lire In a state of ot free tree lo- lo love Mean Mean- Meanwhile I while nile others z marriage has hru lr mf thousands of or years and andIs andIs Is 18 not likely to disappear Sly My Iy own opinion Is that marriage c cas as we know it will neither endure nor disappear It Is a human Institution I 1 and Ulo 1110 other oilier r human bum In- In in-i in It will change I Certainly on one understands those thoc who see Eee In divorce the dawn of or tree free freelove freelove I love for tor divorce made ens easy enough lore reduces marriage to something very illo free love Divorce is a new thing from Crom the popular point ot of v vIe vlen It existed In Greece and In ancient Rome but mainly for men It almost disappeared under the In ln- ln luence In-luence fluence of ot Christianity until the theIst thelast thelast last st century Now we hear that the American rate Is one divorce In ten marriages while willie that hat of or Chicago Is Isone isone Isone one In six No Ao wonder that they cry put out out here it is free lot lore lOle e since they can almost pro pro- procure procure cure curt Q a divorce by filling in a form nut hut however I natural it il may nry be to be bed deceived d d if one is d deceived ce lcd one i is I 1 Iam am n convinced d that hat those hose who fear free love lore are uv wrong Consider what happened In Bus Rus Russia sla sia As soon as the lie JIs carne came Into power the marriage system system tem tern disappeared and was replaced by free love loe but by degrees Bus nus Rus-elan Rus elun elan marriages es were re registered by byan byan byan an official anti and now v they are per per- performed performed formed In the regular way war by agents of the Soviet Sorbet Is this The fhe Why hy s answer con contains tales the whole future of or e abandoned free Cree love IO year ear by year Jear as Russia Hussla allowed private property to form Corm n again aln The Soviet probably did not real real- realize realize ize the relation between marriage and property but It Is very tery Inti Inti- Intimate Intimate mate Where there thero Is no proper proper- property property ty and where children pick l up n a living like animals you OU do not need marriage l Where the community owns all nil property and therefore takes care are of the children you do doI donot donot I not need marriage But where men meni i I and amI women have pare something to J I toj len leave cave It Is es essential that the state elate should know who Is to have e It when I the owners are dead dent t and nOli the state I must know v who is responsible fur for forthe forthe the child Otherwise there will bei be i quarreling and starvation some some sort of ot marln manage maringo Is the only way voy ot of r registering the Information Some tort sort of oJ marriage will therefore sut il to the lid end of oJ time time me b cuU there ure will always be bf a tie lie bt because cause men and women will always want to 10 form homes home Thole who oho do not nOl ree asree Tree with me should remember tint that a the Ille higher namely animals namely the mammals and the form birds birds form very tC united families Mankind will half bare to 10 change beyond recognition before it lives lit in rt free e love or we might say s y free fres of f love loge Only marriage will certainly i I change In many parts of ot I and In the Southern of ot Amer Amer- AmerIca America I ica lea divorce Is very cr or Im- Im Impassible possible I 1 believe that by dc degrees the divorce dl- dl vorce laws of or the world will tend to become the same I They will never be quite the same tame since one law Jaw does docs nut not m t fit sunny Texas and nud I Icy y but we shall not Indefinitely witness a state of ot things s where Nevada N grants a divorce practically without a n rca rea reason son liOU while South refuses to grant any divorce it fit all nIL Of one lne thine thin I am nm sure marriage mar- mar marriage e will not become more dim di- dH cut cult Continual pressure Is put upon the k legislator to tu demand of Ie who want to 10 marry that they should hould produce 3 of ot health vf of identity and of oC morals That Thai will III never Deter go o very far b because became we know k only too well Veil that any Impediments put put In the W way of ur marriage bring brin about In time tn to come Orne I marriage will bp lip as liS easy puy tr to cue con contract tract tract aa as It ll la tr but Iut It will Le be I subject to a II human divorce law v l I II I 1 I beli believe t that will be grant front fronted I rd ed any formality to la t s who happ happen n to 10 be childless chi since their I divorce II IC no n rime i nn clue elir 0 On UI the theother ier other hand I 1 I believe that Ihal public of in I Un Ion is turning ff f inti the dIe present y to- to ti-m ti lIm kh allows a child lu to know toI I three or r four loti fullers fathers in cu as j many years That ThaI t it n to 10 my oar where u re there are Gre children art are likely Ukly to b bf I td rd cd for Jot some umeo years Oll ta to give girt Ji the h couple CI a dunce chance of oJ reconciliation I C I 1 Nine n L 4 r W Ic c VV U U |