| Show ENOI COUNTS CASE A As the complications between england egland and aad america is ia the all absorb absorbing ing topic of the hour doubtless the following dij ow note doto which accompanied be counter case delivered to tho the board of arbitration at geneva genera will be interesting to our readers tha th 1 la Is instructed by nor ifor I 1 1 to only ay that belillo 1 pr re their counter cue under draft the ti tio mentioned they find it incumbent 0 upon pon 14 to form tile iho ailed araton tato that m w u n m tz nd bu un dm or b t brettt i m t anth ea n uni ou t tho T a alf touching lre n t the h e tam fand client of 0 f the cluna c t m referred df to t 0 in i tho the treaty of 0 T ati he rouff Is to daines fur for indirect under three lead I 1 loss tn in transfer of American st arping to ILI iha brill 2 lou lose lag from d IA iamanico manco 3 I 1 LOH ad from of tho the w war ar tb 7 a claims for indirect direct I low awed are not act 1 admitted I by ifer Majc ty government Govoro mont to be b within the scope copo kod and IcI of the Arb arbitration itys heir government ho ha been md a catill till syll kro in ia co with the go bov of bato ID to As aa that luu had act imn besets barour b ito a finel llor her MAI c ww gov GOT ras dutli hotl blut alio llio arbitration n ajia roused with claims for or direct loon they iii ave thought it soc antime to present a counter ease which is strictly to ui as mt clam so in the hop that tho the HD unfortunate fortunate misunderstanding may idy bo be 11 md 4 notify tho the arbitrators tul that itus counter case i is without prep dicato to ILA uj ly her a guy gor la in the whereto rotor cam lw IRA thou boan eng dido wl and under two of all ua her Majo ins to in tto the event of to ei went the tire I 1 if further farther communication will U bo be to mado Q to the litow lit tw omni to renoa the there cao can be no doubt that it america presses ber claims for couse I 1 q u e nual damages tile queen win withdraw d ra w her ministers froni from the geneva council and end cad arbitration beti seen the he affo ty jn in that hat caso 0 vre ire see nothing but the issue of war for while bile efland would insist that her majesty I 1 was justified in withdraw withdrawing ilg ino clio joint high commission not having plated COD sequential damages tho the united states state if iu ita case cabe as aa now noor pro pre cited ho be maintained will or of bourbo insist that hat great britain casual cannot withdraw and that arbitration must go oo on this certainly would bo be sufficient cause fur for it would bo be equivalent to 9 direct dorcet rup P ture care between tho the two powers and war could only bo be pre anted in ia honor to either cither nation by tho the people impeaching the conduct of their gov got ern ments in the transaction ex president volcey Vo leey of yale Colle gehas deemed it an imperative duty in him to milc make As manifesto upon the treaty through tho the new york independent which the horld II 11 affirming that indirect damages damage mua not be urged before the court of arbitration the now new york cwi arid and other calling papers hold the tame same opinion as doubtless do also the ho meet inducts bial class of the american people that abo of never dever will cot coo sent bent to accept the cue cw of con consequential lien damages is most certain for to their fraind it would not only bo be considered something equivalent to a conquest over them but in imagination they would see sec their country bankrupt no britch could stand that accepted abc acc elt the american MR anae dow presented preat at therefore aa Us iu pressure would result in war if tho the united mowed followed up the withdrawal of ilor majesty from the treaty iu in tho the ardi ordinary gary w way tz it is to to be earnestly bo honed a that a C ffoyd understanding may yet tot CM a reached between tw con these two great grait logli hh speak ing iok nanon which will bo be honorable alike to lath ich |
