Show FULLER ON THEOCRACY in liu lits on tie the state question I 1 mr denounced Terri toriA ys raa balago and affirm affirmed od the ho justice and of admitting tam tho territories into tile the iho union against aich general view of alic subject there can be no ex inception Ic caption eption talen we tc ore arc ourselves in the admission or of territories to statehood bood kill but not in favor rii or of clothing theocracy walli power mr I 1 ruller uller seemed 01 0 J to appreciate that the republic TO end nd the tha kingdom were not proper partners for the union but to smooth the pith fur fir norman mormon state flood he ha theo crier ila he did not to controvert the fact that ho he anil and his ha gentile colleagues wore were in grand conclave with mormon apo lie alea elisho lii khop ps and nd ailigh priests Pric sta but with a touch affirmed that all irali gionA aro are title of course ii id true god goa being the ibe idea or of religions and and in thi aclise is i not out of I 1 laoc lam in a re can any more than in i a church and auta ire are united but will sacre tary lary fuller te be bold enough it 11 affirm i in the raco fco of lii alory and the pr it economy or of nations na tiona fiat all religions ba have velleen lccy so many theocratic gutend thien ts flare the nations been un nn jor jer theocratic alii rule I 1 li Is a theocratic dorthis na republican or ral in a re rc sho s be act up in ia america the paul and g gor or choing power of whirl which would be 0 91 hood could that state or does doca that convention in mr fuller tin ita composed or of apostles and high priam lri cU represent anything other than tho the union of chuili and state it at be beat and the he church the firul ansill of the he state stale these gentiles lie ho tire are engaged to make the great speeches at the convert don and aal to hew out the etalo c to blocks for tho the kingdom well know that mor moor mon man theocracy is altogether diff different ernt from flint of ordinary reli religion giom badim in modern times christian churches ire are as aa a rule fillo simply dimply congregational i but luttio the norman mormon church iq ii a bent territorial or state national Na lional and independent as tho the mill caw may bo be it las been territorial it designs now to become a state stale which would be nothing more nor less than aiato theocracy me F Is ii it desirable that chat mulkh it ili should continue under such finch a regime re gioie cursed by tho the bondage a state would place upon the the fist increase in ing gentile and non mormon popola lion 1 this tb D is the great and vital question which irlich thou those gentlemen of the con ien tion bearing the name of gentile excepting judge Il ayllOn so aro abc ba braying tra ying mr life fuller us as a kind of fur fr ike ho fail that no religious communities were disposed to grant grani to others the same bame rights ind aud privileges which they claim for thouis clym this thi a is true but would mr fuller agree to let the governments of nations go gi into the hands bands of religious zea zealous zealots lots who have this fital fatal tendency to clarit chai m but not to grant or rather hall not nol nations remain iq in a senea scale tite condition condit ioni ss as we sad find them almost purely to be day throughout tile tho civilized world our forefathers cant cal out iho control 0 f the church over the iho state slate achill w we e restore it in utah it has baa exi bcd here for over twenty acara in a territorial form shall it il now bo be with state sovereignty shall utah now she is nearly redeemed from d du vell mimon nion L be ema LOiJa cd b i aado fourfold four fold oi tin move more haughty trieba 13 3 triumph and who isho white whilo they demand their own rihl righta nover grant egnal to others t I 1 hat is the question itle stion tw lor mr 1 afler and his hin gentile cump eurs a the iho convention to deride decide |