| Show OUR OUK UTAH commanders IK chier we had begun 0 o fear that tile the U S legal or the owr iiii r organ ot of the mormon church would not dot fmc me to time in his series chiea of articles entitled the power of congress over the Terri territory tor ies but sunday sandal morning brou jit us his hia second luar quarried ried effort la in the meantime however a local paragraph sung out oat to us ui to stand at ease informing the public that wo we were unhappy in in our oar way of telling what wo we know about cilich of uth ulab militia certainly wo we know inow the salient of tho the history of those comman deri in ia alier from the begio Ding which probably the ibo U S legal of th the 0 salt lake heram herald loci does not bei being us we vs presume ofte of recent cent importation here is i the first erst point suggested by the aforesaid local which mua be noticed before his lengthy the nut which wile ila shaffer if coul dat celk nor his bu successors luc ceMore was vu how hoir a chi chief ef coull abolish bit aji commean and oDdi bUro m I 1 in it the fact i acl is is that shaffer dil dot abolish his bis concluded and could not ho be fc imply a mili la fa a ghitl ati A he because that coa midd was usurped ly a client general wits created by a power lower foreign to that which breall creaked 1 lim aul and hostile to li it is this reviewer that thai makes confusion worse cou coufou foUnded oiled bad od riot cot tc t c Tt as to lc insinuates for he has bus confounded actual and funds mental authority with organization liun of militia or regular forces foras bibb 1 cl k grow out oat of it and in this caso case confounded it with a 3 militia grew out ofa of a pow tt er foreign to itself and hostile to its ex ci ercito la IQ mae power it abolished nothing of deStro crippled or that hostile abl force this il if the exact practical cue cose not noe oaly laai illustrated in Sha chafers fers act lutin but in the rott against we octa and words is eming from authorities to 0 o the rule of the federal authority over this territory indeed ignot is not this tho acry alfi cation of tho the argument against ina r of the tha I 1 territories Terri torie A 1 la in ab aboU di ish AUng i it ft in iii abi which ch bo 1 41 not ml comro 00 ind 1 ny cobi not 1201 command comit oc a ad I 1 and which he bo looked upon as IL rebel re 1 ur or ot at lem forea as those very tery facts ats proved go vernor shaffer destroyed nothing OT or his aj finda authority confirmed by tho the president and coa cell PS arem tho the of a state territory colony or province whether of monarchial of republican nat iorio as as we ro affirmed is u tite the real comman commander erin er in iti chief of all the military forces which do way ny or ought to exist par governors still elul hold the authority aut bority for the organization organisation and command of a loyal militia of uth utah notwithstanding they have haire disbanded a disloyal legion oi of r the mormon which they could nol cot command comm aad and if this reviewer u is so abuso that be cannot crack the nut of how hor aa commander in chica could abolish his ha command ond and still ri retain it I 1 perhaps pel bills ho he can answer this plain faction on h when was any govar nor of utah arter Brig brigham hane young i in chief or the abo nauvoo Au legion and when du did he ac com cont manil inand that is tho the question which studied out effectually and ho he cracked tho the out but of abolishing abol ishio a great deal of somebody alses command but gothing of ills his own Is this tb u reviewer so d daft a a that he cannot tand this problem |
