Show BITTER TALK IN COURT standard oil representative becomes excited CALLS ATTORNEY A LIAR whis this brought A n counter boalt when it ft Dis coulso Fol followed owed that cannot be rut put in cold Type oll Oil bagnato cooled down tor for FL a time nad an I 1 then despite tile the Ps ft otist of the com commissioner mag he opened up his tirade against attorney gendral front from I 1 CL caille Ille was finally SUIT d lt new york tork march larch IS tho the hearing in n tile case of the attora attorney icy general of oil carol any the standard ahlo against J evaa ass continued today with jolla john D I 1 archbold ot of the St stanard anillI oil com company pally tin on the stand str archbold Arc libold replying to mr monnett stated the standard com lany of oba ohio la is carn caroln ing ff out the court to withdraw from the th I 1 of p the ohio standard oil trust as speedily as possible was not tile the enllie interest of the liquidating committed to on conr attorney asked attorney flagg for ilia and did lie he not vote veto lor for all their interests in the stock tic the liquid liquidating sting trustees be b salil sald baa e never voted since the dissolution of 0 f the trust defore before that time I 1 did vote 0 to for or officers ot of the standard oil c company 0 A number 1 n bar ot of other questions arc bere iere ask asked allu t to a the duties of 0 the lle liquidating trustees and then air cline for the standard oil objected to 11 r flagg askin g I 1 u after the ilia attorney Atto iney general had complita comp litI lit ats q lion CO na aloner br I 1 ruled that only molle one I should conduct the hie cross croas exam did the offic cirs of ft the company lioard board of trus aes f or r the tru trust L comp company ny after the de roc ree ot ISO asked mr monett 1 I 1 object wild sald sir cline I 1 AD TO commis commissioner 4 loner brinsmade told mr fr Aich archbold bold to 10 reply and he answered 1 I dont know kt ow ahat hat he mean mcain and nd I 1 dunt ahli think lk he dols does did the defendant company amr any know 0 officially mr lally ot of tho the meeting meeting of march 1 wa liben n lien the hie trusts were di dision boived cd naked mi bit Iton monnett flett 1 dont know replied sir mr arch hj bioli 1 I sippe oc some ot of us know about it individually did it the a company coro rouy oppose in any anyway way that ihal rebii resolution aaion what whatever or ac action ion was taken by the company compan y was as in careful compliance with the a ruling of the court you Y u evident evidently illy die did not understand that question remarked mr monnett lonnett Al well ve it im in not to be blamed lor for that said sir fr archbold anti and lie requested laj ljj leip anetter to stand A when lion the question as 8 i ecea IV was not the hie defendant company p I 1 sent at die ile meeting by some 0 o its il sikh 0 I 1 ders I 1 di D i beleas some ft lle ilia stock owners it re il present I 1 dont sao any sense in the question ALL QT OBJECTED TO early every question asked was met inet by on an objection from rom counsel mr ile tried to by tho the witness that the standard oil company com piny was as ello lively ic ie presented at the meet meeting 0 marei 21 lve as it ft was at the he formation ot of tile lie t 1 list in ass but lie not tram frame a question proof again t ih the objections oc the counsel and t the b aul lulloff ing ot of the com commissioner commissioned at last he gave up the ilia attempt and asked to yo your has any act or lion effort been made by the company to disentangle a J itself irom from tho the trust except t ti tall fall t tn w with ith the ilia resolution passed on march llarch I 1 21 the com company f absolutely alben tangled from tho the oil and it lias has done one no act jilt n t in accord eulth absolute disentangle girnt front the ilia trust attorney Y general Blon monnett nett persisted in his bis an beav ar 2 r to tn show allow the defendant company vas mill a part of 0 the trust nil th that L t its wag as controlled by the tr U t but air archbold Arc libold as per as dellel such was vas tile the case so 1 inida atter after the liquidation in icord ic ordnance ince with the order of oc the court no A idock oe k of the corporation remained r eina enod in th the a of oc the trustees or under their control LAWYER AT AND WITNESS QUARREL whilo mr flagg mail as suggesting to nir mr monnett mr arch b cwm old spoke t to 0 mr jr elliott El llott mr jr flagg part ot of the talk and sald hotly 1 I an am not in n tile habit ot of rec ivill ivans an fiucci ch treatment from at tn in ibes a archbold leaned leane d ills elbows on oil the tibia table and retorted li ill have bething me thing to say aay to you presently mr air flagg you boj have been di inking mr archbold said bald mr bir flagg flage no ino I 1 have not been drinking ex tea I 1 know what im about mr bin t I 1 to you but ihal lal man indicating blagg ii 19 rl ri dicu our mi it E 1 ilott asked the witness 1 I iness as to th ili statement tat etnest made to tile the le importers porters mi 11 priday friday tha eliat t ell the 0 company hal had de sixteen cases caca ot of their books lust list after an in order was evits made to pro dur duo them hi c n before tile the master the s said mr ir Archbo lJ not L true rue it is 18 false and malicious mall cloua and u was a ma made falsely and knowingly it was made to mislead public sentiment mr flagg flage something hinR and mr clr archbold shouted you keep idill or ril ill expose you oil right liere bere you anderm nir mr ijaga you cant expose anything bitten R LANGU Aan USED you ou low lived began mr Aph Arb buld lan any one tie be low asked mi klueg 11 in comparison comp arlson with A ith a st sl magnate A decent in man a it would N olid bo be ashamed to 1 walk alk up the street it ith you you Y tt talk ot of me you in u you are arc ft a coward couard anil and a liar sli cited mr archbold you file aie li 11 hav responded mr flugg P omally you are a coward md all your millions curet help belp ou if u can expose any one do I 1 it t now you at aie e a a contemptible allt e in prible liar re rc tertod mr ile A rh bold me on one blackmailing are you I 1 you are always claiming that nc red mr ir flags flagg while mr ir archbold and mr yr flags flagg ahu thus discoursing ner mr elliott ap at paled to commissioner tb ali comal mioner invoked bot h to be quiet air r flagg was the hie first to recover rei oscr bli bit composure HO he lighted a cigarette und nd walked wa aked vp up and down boiu the room win ahn fl order was re nored mr ile Blon monnett nett albed mr air archbold Arch boli did not your employee emp loyeL aice jerney I 1 lafy that lie burned sixteen books aks a casts ages of 0 and did it not t the drayman oh ob orate ills tes cor testimony r kev dont don t did 1 1 lie 1 not t burn sixteen boo books cases of 0 any he gave eave rc fel red to th son ft it old aid ill ling matter and to material to lo ahli issue Is 1 lt it lint 1 I true that dl hin sod a aliv bals lays dals later was I 1 daret know I 1 know ne e did not lic li to alark a moment longer for UK con al ahl ill i the pr of 0 1 ar I ajas mr abc ibbil I repented repeated ahli elnine 0 A alt the 1 atkis attorney ncy gon lint T athla abma man lie said gives elves out bulso and mail clou statement to lo a auch uch 11 L PC as will publish them ile he cot vc lt n JO lot E of fell foin oits of fit low station and mo noal to furnish the testimony ho wanted those low fellows were your ow n am employees plo asked ir mr bit archbold Arch boltl dodged doil gril the 1 ion I 1 1 I know at one a man os as an a aal I 1 raid fald he you yen know nil all about them it 11 WU waa you hired til them t in that thal ara used t attic be at attorney torney generel gendral aho vho ho had bad so BO tu kept hla his tm pr r 1 well you antan in T u it to nay kay lie shouted ft that I 1 hired a single man to give coloma colomi testimony two or three times lio lie ac repealed this question but mr ir archbold did it nut nt reply finally 11 ay hr air archbold Aich bold said ald your ri 1 dondit ondit on dit has borne evide rim of fallt LY you brought in testimony that was untrue and kept out testimony ton knew me 0 could piove giove untrue mr arr archbold interrupted the commissioner you really must yes I 1 know a answerers answer erl the witness live but I 1 cant stand it th this man an hil haa the state ot of ohio my in i native state loni long eno u gh and it is urn time hs be wa wat rebuked M Blon nott then obtained tin tile ear of tile the cant coarl L lie ile lot ru 1 e a I 1 conff n rig it argument in favor of striking out all the he alt part of mr air Arch bolds mr ir cline replied and the court deett led to stirl out nil it but the tit que quelin qIn and answer mr Arch bolds contradiction ot of the published statement ot of mr air mon ion alt in tt then monnell Blon nett got ot on an the record an ans answer or florit roni mr archbold that all I 1 lie knew of the burning of tile tl cases of hooks books led and of testimony M was as bv cent potent authority 1 mr bir made a brief speech explaining pla ining he be had represented the state of ohio an adjournment vait ulen taken laical until monday at 10 a m |