Show AJAX CASE ON TRIAL suit involving sam McInty res claim for services incompetency IS ALLEGED Plain plaintiff till is suing for 1200 on salary account and on oil ft a claim bought front henry M X eyan sup supreme reme court affirms the judgments in the cases lynch vs find and grovo vs earl nonsuit grunted granted lit in a real estate case I 1 i I 1 judge lilies illicit 13 engages engaged lit in trying one 0 f the numerous suits thit hive resulted su 1 led from rom the differences between samuel and tile the ajax mining miffing company I 1 in the present action Men tyre sues rues to recover 14 1200 04 alleged to be due him as salary lor for services as manager of the ajax mine from january 9 1899 to january 9 and on oil a alahn against the mine ilitch he purchased brorn henry 11 II ryan the company denlea denies that mcintyre was manager of 0 the property properly during the period for or A aich he sues and a also so denlea denies that the claim of 0 li 14 flue due 11 he e la 13 further charged ith tency during iho time that lie he was waa man mi dinager ager nager of 0 the plo property perty in 1895 Is rep represented resented by george sutherland and the ajax mining company by judice dey john IV burton and lawrence P boyle mein ty re rested his case lato late in the afternoon and a motion for a nonsuit had been part partially lally argued when court adjourned until this morning TWO CASES AFFIRMED supreme court decisions in mining and mortgage casts cases opinions were handed down donn by the supreme court yesterday affirm ling the judgment ot of the lower courts in the cases of 0 E I 1 P lynch et al a appellants vs antonio et SI and george il 11 grova grovis vs rachel karl earl appellant in the case ot of lynch et a al As s covle ur et ct alt al suit was brought to recover posse littlon of a part of the Julie bug mining culm claim in the camp floyd mining district and judgment was rendered in III favor avor ot of defendant defend 4 0 B piano tor for the property from the judgment the plaintiffs appealed but the supreme court finds no error in the record rc c or d and affirms the action ot of the iho trial court the opinion la Is written by justice bartib and ana chief justice zane and justice miner liner concur in the caso case 0 of george if vs rachel earl suit bult vaa instituted to recover SING 1000 on a promissory note a as cured by a mortgage mort saKe mrs earls de dc bense anae was that she eho waa induced by her husband to execute the note and mortgage riot not know knowing ifil that tho the mortgage embraced her individual property judgment below wa was i tor for the plaintiff and the judg mient Is affirmed by the supreme court the opinion Is written by justice miner and chief justice zane and justies justice birtch bartch concur REA KEAI L ESTATE CASES nonsuit granted after tho the plaintiffs testimony was in judge cherry began the hearing of 0 the recent setting of civil jury emes cases yesterday the first case called being an action brought by rachel hachel mcalester against emma morse marge et a al TI the 1 e plain tiff ti was wag represented by C 8 kinney and alex mcmaster and mojid the defendant by krebs krebb hoppaugh and C W V lorse mrs sued to recover the possession of a part of lot 6 block 47 plat B D alleging that tile the defendant wrongfully entered into possession or of the property in october 1892 and a still t ill retains it damage to the amount of I 1 aki vi are also prayed the defendant alleged that she entered into possession of the pro property prop city under art an oral agreement with the plaintiff at the conclusion of the Plain tur testimony judge cherry grant edthe edth defendant a non nonsuit sult |