Show goll DEFENSE ALL ALLIN IN defendant efen dant spent much of tho the day on the stand I 1 OF HIS OVERDRAFT ac ans li limit ire he said president of the bank no ila ta jia as allowed it little id more ore license as ifton most sanitarium trans actions trial ot of n R lirey ali salt lalia lahe izere suit against J a ogden railway company cham effs iffs sues sac utah central I 1 ring ill grenter greater part of t yeater at r s visions ot of the states dig james 11 II bacon was on 41 0 ourt court wd in 1 ills own w defense in the spenst him for or false entries p a direct examination mr air bacon 1 that in february when nhen rican national bit bank ink vent out america Anle n ho he received the als assets sets of 0 I 1 eti ounce stence Is bank as a aurclia purchaser wr and that batho effir if the A assets a is he ha received shares S F W I 1 at lum stock ho he sali sal I that he girad ved other shares of i the stock etheli aa q term to if certain notes note a included include d in fiedt tanks baulk 8 abets mulcts in regard IM custom of 0 entering ent crine up it Es as loans and discounts lie ho saad hillh I 1 ill the hank bank examiner had told him tot the croper it ay to enter up rivert oscr afu is as by helmst ni aji of 0 aw lie ho tinted that lio lie had in tho the nt notes for or the entire amount of 38 V represented rean scented the differ tt between uie the overdraft account sot act to the report and it ahat hat the lie m cilien had bird claimed it 11 should ix be ri dever oever an overdraft all untied arged kr in mid vance ho he said it aas tho the estam not to lo 10 require the braier to give la wyral note jie JI sald bitet t then sere cra in the report to U comptroller but t they y nere re due to chatt cht atiles tt in putting in tile the column Is your fill faill name asked at wy y Naf rinnis on oil cross examination exam li harrison arilson bacon are you tile the J harrison nho hov VM im on the ho books for a note litwan in ln tile the hummer of 0 1993 1 I 1 dt dont remember any such artho arthe r answered col ellis Ellla objected to tile the question and unaided ln aided that both hatli question and an I 1 r be buaken out toe the objection sustained IUS ills OWN OVERDRAFT ht bacon vent rent on to state that ills amral overdraft over in the bank aaa ailed led to ua a aad nd ihen M lien charged by I 1 tle maginnis MILE having havone loverdi brillan A it lie denied the I 1 he charge levu evas asked by bla ginnis to pro produce tuce ui h overdraft note but the th ss sa aid that that thai note had been long ago aeo neK led you yoa it did you shouted py Alli ginnIs wel how bow dad rou happen to kep keep those figures of info judda dds m billich alch aou duj used against bim yesterday use audgo judd gave them to lor eliat pu nose bacon an sered ered ud d he h hm nover never asked lor for thell tham ti I 1 go Ila ginnis went anent on oil to question t r liacone in regard to ills his personal pr sona edrett is aich lota december idali clr stated elated was tire the re 1101 t of that Is that tho the wi limit M if anything it if asked the beuting attorney altor tiey not of by any means but as preal dent the bank I 1 allowed blittle little more moio law than mott mait aided it what existed in n the aa k lor for tire llie harrison note for a lr bacon said that he h had no decol itlean 0 the that i did not recollect i v he ther he wat was an in the or not but e stated that ho he had ball filled out a ca number ol of ut of stock 1 he company oom pany binl WE it a fact that tho the stock mock were by IL II 11 bacon i mank and bere vc ic filled up by yu you hatt a you wanted to show enow them to as the property of the bank aa U a ked certainly not your brother aas as nominally th tho e ident he be A hile you ran th tho 0 11 so no vir mr indignantly at this an adjournment was litell until afternoon ad anoon mr bacon resumed the iland ter ller the and trifled ihal the tit ink had in its it possession at the time ix its in change ot at and char character acLer wit wi 1 t eighty shares ot of sanitarium mk as collateral tho line ot of ques w vt tit was ira objected oba acted to mid and mr ma ida aeils arils stated that lie he proposed proponed ili ned to show tet t tho th numbers of 0 share chires of 0 stock aich lie air bacon sald said the th bank had in possession differed materially from dom report rendered by mr lazier also lat t tile the 9 block I 1 ock was issued without the adge of 0 tho sanitarium company w that nhen hie elie bank bajik examiner vw all that bacon had to do was to 90 to 0 tho the tault lault pick out a wail wad of 0 w stock mock and say ay that it belonged to bank iloco e ruled that proof of 0 ud id against the sanitarium company 4 1 not show guilt of 0 the charge tit in a indictment and lie he excluded tile the unions tte the alness IL ness furt further ter cross ex Mc atlon stated that he knew noth t about a credit of 0 00 to bi peral ori on oil EL note ot of tho the danl TOH company with the th S K As collateral wal as he did trot not decol w that t aay such transaction had n pi place n said further that tile tho sms res in the report to the comptroller correct except OB as to K I 1 minor points which made no dk dif if ca in ift the totals and bere v ere due to cal errors 08 ln in the books ot of tho the bank n ill closed the mao case lor for the defense IN W D sharp fortman foreman ot of the krand grand ms ly bilich found the hie indictment dunst ME mr fr uns nas called by tile if bAet in rebuttal and t C F loofbourow had testified 40 that body if that at ho he had never an fn A any ny haull hault arlum stock in the hank bank ht e likewise stated that 11 M bacon ma d F L holland Ho llanil had likewise deritt I 1 r d that hat they iere ignorant iKno rant ut of the ik elne alne 1 in tit I 1 lienk ank ald re St arshall 1 nilca I c d that the pros iro firkin lon lint haa no right to t 0 impeach its alln a ow n ansell it Mii still and ordered the evidence 11 as a il 31 bacon and 1 L holland ken out I 1 if i on olt hla ros mr iff sharp said alit A is r in fit regard aci ard to the r al VM as hazy rind ind lie he 01 liol of sure ot 0 the ibe late date that air tr TAO f lef deferred erred to which 4 on tire bank 4 no atu btu 10 lo IL k 1111 ando f pratt a Mer ritter and a clerk i i and a jury iury A fell found tile the liti in L agal sn janice 11 bacon d as and was waa arkid ked to refresh it his ts amrom train th the e minutes ax as to what air if row testified d to the defeat nn le W 0 tile tha introduction ot of ill thi book and the ObJect objection lon I 1 ned vast ulin sun u ei the it i 8 corroborated ii if testimony la ft regard to mr bobrow try 9 statement to the grand 1 IL ka lift r fe ann aa reca recall tied d and stated 14 lot IN aa limox bad told him ahl he ani or fr having vrr ver signed fur unis her in 01 a ol te 11 t n to alto k regard to I 1 the he status of 0 the I 1 I 1 RO account u t of various depositors an and it cm IN I 1 or 11 the ba ban tit and vials wn up upon the stand 1 at All attorney ovney said ald a nt t adjournment mel it thai flat hi had two more w witnesses to place u upon 1 1 in 1 anond I in ebu uita im slid that it the la testimony of anol neither aber of t them donld occupy more than birtee rn minute n u I 1 P 11 I 1 ii I 1 I 1 gifts sw that pach each elac d b be allowed a arranged d but tuti luo hours for oo 00 1 it I 1 Is 9 probable that the case cage will insoo so to the jury this afternoon A or e mcnina ening TRIAL or OF A DAMAGE SUIT 7 caso case r resulting arom injuries to sirs laura murray judge cherry heard the c case ase yesterday of laura murray and husband against tho the great salt lake ilot hot springs railway company on appeal from COmmis eloner sommers Som merB court the Plaint plaintiffs iffa sued to recover 31 2219 for foi injuries received by irs by i earon of the iho alleged negligence of the company and on account of medical attendance it as set out lot ini tile the complaint that while drivell dr ivill on third faryl hlll second north streets elroc ta ift september IM mrs mui Aluir rays ays bortle became frightened filch lencl at an engine on tile the defendants road and ran aay throy throw I 1 nir her out of the vehicle and painfully her hei commissioner sommer found in favor avor ot of lh if 1 for or 41 SO and the elie de dc fending fen dint appealed the trial nas I 1 led had esterday este iday b borc fore tile the court J it murphy OPI Patin 9 for tie the plaintiffs and IS L IT a crutchlow w for t the defendant the hearing beai laff hall had not boon been concluded at the elie 3 hour our ot of adjournment nt F P C Cha chambers tabers sues central it C chambers lias has nid filed ni d a claim ir for wl in the ilice court couil 1111 almit the re receiver celver of the I 1 utah central company as a rental for tile the compi company nym a c n gine house tit nt park city and also I 1 upon pon certain land used I IY by Y the hie company at that thai point court notes william 11 slid and william parker were yesterday appointed of the estate of S II 11 porter deceased di casel judge Nor reUs court aill bu be in it so sea slon elon today tho ease case or of C II 11 ashbrock la la A 9 samuel bauch was argued atilt anil submitted before judge hiles yesterday the case 0 of ogden city va hear bear river and ogden rom ini igny jay froia tile alic state slate dla brict court at ogden I 1 IBS as lied filed sit in dis tie hie united states court lout list evening A motion to remand fill case hilll be argued this mornine dietr district act court orders N P Tho nilson etc i it 0 ilo ila grande western wes Wel tern hallway company reset tor for december IV JI it bitoy et al s stone slone company tomp tiny judgment JudKin ent in faor ot of plaintiff for or 65 ich ill interest john T ireland jr vs essic J ireland bet act for december dc german cerman savings bank vs A IT mayne et ct ill al stricken from trial calendar lucus T vs james thompson ad administrator nini judgment by in favor of Plain plaintiff tift for find and costs cogis consolidated implement company vs beaver valley land still and irrigation company judgment entered lit in faor of plaintiff tor 50 |