| Show I 1 I 1 I 1 y WAS SURPRISED lag ng his absence his wife k lad ad secured a divorce I 1 k I 1 i a 1 1 i I 1 I 1 I 1 HEA ad THE SUIT t proceed to ascertain where 1 11 II located mil and may lay begin lc I 1 8 to test the valid edings 1 Eliza affleck and 1 of the Decree two dis ait I 1 L ed wives freed from matil I 1 1 court at itice ties supreme 6 a accident insurance I 1 case L ism E r bray was as in a stew yes this of 0 itself HICK Is no not I 1 surprising A way bray IS 13 a cook and te mr not nol new to him the are ITI ln in hon hone ever vcr Is nucci C jell he Is no now malch aich differs from the atje stev sim in many imlay essentials stew hnnry arar returned home to tile the city rray bray yesterday find and shortly a at r denver avreal lie he discovered cred that ills his t heir brit had secured a from filed mrs bay sn n hill bla absence bei ath ith lost last al Septem september ivllon lion ou on that she was as married to the january 1 I and that it on dij j trea treated her cruelly thereafter r ined that he assaulted her I 1 oc occasion cablon and bit lee her thumb w time ho he knocked att at tt at another loofe ac iron this t bowing she elie vaa mas led decree on october ay 7 1 slid I id yesterday that lie he had bad k heard of 0 the proceedings proc c edings until turn from damer end ana that thai he tiled d investigating the matter lie he fed ltd the lh third district court during tile tho vernoon ger noon and after M started out in catch dita data tary m y rj itnyer if blay lives up lip to hla his lations iral loiis lle he be licali lie aid from i JIVES GRANTED DECREES I 1 I 1 1 I testify that matrimony was not bol beneficial to them edg lilles granted eliz auza a alleck it a te me of 0 divorce ironi front robert affleck frilay on the grounds of habl habitual and failure to supports support L aaka that sin she was marto I 1 the defendant in this city in niarra IM as and that they had tour four inn area ranging in age from three to a yeara she also te testified stifled that averal veral years past her husband been guilty ot of habitual drunken 1 i his sprees sometimes extending r period of several months at to it tirom mes she said enid she fihe would have legend uron upon her mother for the ahe of 0 life iter her mother had furnished her ith bedding onil anti assisted her dui ins ing her mat onial experiences sirs mrs alecks liss litomy was abunda abundantly it v corrodo rr b I 1 and she was irant an I 1 cd d a it decroi I 1 r ims as also so awarded I 1 the he I 1 custody s 0 i children and alimony alli nony lii fit tile tho sum WA liw of 0 raich MOOT 1000 Is in tor for tho the chii i assil nd KM lor for bergelt ber self affleck Is a matrimonial ties gullich have wave lafora bound emily L and john hol debrand together niel c also sevi I 1 tr by judge lilies alles upon the or oatho the alte N nho ho complained that clint husband hubband had failed to support her 4 was also avar awarded ded custody of 0 two children asid and at al 0 alimony y in 1 the sum or of lavoo to 10 P chidell children equally between iles heiselt self and CASE AFFIRMED nar maynard Maynar cL to receive the amount of ills bis policies 1 I he aft supreme court handed lie tided down an ilon affirming the judg lt it of 0 the court below in tho the case ot of AI alt hl aynard vs ve the locomotive I sneers nii ecra mutual lite life and accident arance lisso association clation appellant icard who mho was a 11 locomotive on cn lr r received an injury on tho the head june ISM which resulted in the ot the eight of at ills his right tye eye on a 8 A 1 1194 lie he then sued to recover a 0 vilo mo policies of each which iso elation refused to upon unon the ground that thal he nas mas slot not tied to lo anything dor alor to slay may ag M 1934 tho the aRso association clation a b bylaw by law baw divich re read ad as follows ly member walle anlie I 1 in any lul evil Avo avocation callon receiving bodily lnell inell alch alone shall caus cause total permanent loss or 0 E shall lve ire the tha full amount ot df this policy I 1 11 date named lamed this bylaw by lly law was so that the expression exi expression acdal total permanent loss or 0 eyesight anas as I 1 la to read total a and rid permanent ot of give cn or both cy eyes cs ii association refused to pay tho the ly cy the ground that H t u las as liable except for permanent loss ht it at the time tho the injury was bled and that may maynard nard could slot not e advantage ot at it the ie amendment ell ch provided fur for payment in case the total and permanent penna neut loss 1 ol 01 I or bolt eles he tio ourt court holds however I 1 Is I 1 the entitled to re recover cover sit judgment ot of the I 1 lower ewer court court affirmed he lu opinion la 13 written by justice uee tice ach cs 1 anil and rth climet 1 e justice zane and concur n c ur court notes not es lellam j jill G mcafee h haa as nied an aci I 1 1 8 9 george A V 1 collett 1 6 allace et at al t 1179 on 1 a I promissory T note j m 1 I HA attorneys fee beca h w N rid f it y an and 4 C casualty s U 1 ay iy company IY new e vv CL york lias ab a b begun n alt against aernie at I 1 N endsor ac 11 hudson and mi I 1 1 r I 1 a urt arity ur ity n r 11 S scott I 1 to collect t W 16 i ovll d to so b be avs due a pr premiums i clo Pol 1 le lelea I 1 ilet nelch h I 1 eb sh they t h have V tilled failed to 4 district Ii strICt court orders 1 S D ler tt claflin vs pre fred d simon et alint 01 overruling 1109 dein urier to coin am an and amended ended complaint and t to 11 mol barl strike I 1 out part of a in amended I 1 lion let bet aside anil and d demurrer and ara D v VB john dern derrer detell 0 tell and tell te days t to aner S shade aft dc V 10 boyd park par it et ct ill al wa ila in rl f favor avor 0 f ida lit wray va the thornal kearns rl 1 lor far mo ino new trial a and to 0 o relax costs r W 1 I 1 farrell vs va salt lake 4 city i county d demurrer demurrer onty days day to overruled and I 1 J 0 0 atlon for or irwin dera vs VB tili D taken 13 craft ct a al under T L al ad aih N national illonal bank vs v s river case r F 1 arrer overruled overrule d and ten days day j to 1 1 C lemons young vs E JL A kesler Kessl cr W withdrawn I 1 LE n for further sei flor I 1 |
