Show CONTENDS contending ATTORNEYS the warm suit of snyder vs jennings A hatter of deed correspond en re Trl bunel july IG 16 two case cafcas 5 d demanded c the otte ntina of oc judge wliilam william M 1 mccatty in the sixth district court at richfield today mary C Sorens Ln vs va minnie soren men en tt et al doth parties live tit at sauna salina son married rIed de fondant L plaintiff execl executed red to nor her bon it a di eed deed to tile the property upon blob they tit ey lived but before the deed was her son bon died ills midow the th defendant corot continued title to dwell upon the land deeded to her ter husband deceased decea qed and her mother ln in law the plaintiff having never delivered the deed now ruf flues for ejectment the court took tile matter under advisement kiin ATTORNEYS SL SUIT rit G ampon denn snyder vs J byron je fin I 1 n athla r his is in ille ilif ault between betseen tuo att attorneys lato partners that is 1 more attention lon than any othor other case cage thing far on n tho the july docket only one on plaintiff snyder took the viand today lodar ani and ills his la Js not cOmP completed lefoll to I 1 wit ills ilia it tory is that and he lin lintela telI into a pai partnership inai ship far the th of lawon july 9 sifi und and that abey on may asay rt 6 1997 prom from the articles of ilia solution entry of a number of oc and orneys collected collect eil defendant had find failed to report and shirli plain plaintiff tIft did not discover until after the ilic i some come of thern jennings claimed as a fees earned by and bc belonging longing to himself for far the thit that he was waa re taine I 1 b e fore tit chev e v became par tivi learned that theme mere false on airich 1001 defendant made a trip or of tn ten days to ka nab and upon his return re plotted toil that his expense 1411 amounted to 76 plaintiff demurred dembik d and defendant refusing to an ail itemized statement reduced the bin bill in toto tolo to sll still plaintiff la Is contending that jenningss actual did not aegle i gato gati more than 25 jennings assigned to snyder a 10 account against 0 P borg bore snyder tant to collect it and borg told lohl him had already drbull it appeared at this time atter after their dissolution and refused to pay lay tho the SID 10 defendant also alao has hai firm money deposited in the J AI peterson binh bank in jennings trill ind snyder more ere attorneys tor for T AV V ros urion upon chose crime they look loaf un an appeal jennings telling voss moss that the stenographers fees would avant amount to ta 25 i atilt tec ehing a 96 check for t that h a amount when it CILMO camo to filing with reporter rollo rolla the bill vas aits only to N anti and jennings docketed nock nook eted the difference renac 73 when they dissolved jennings told snyder that ross still owed omed them the 25 trill and assigned him that paja paid account in the settlement on may lay esth plaintiff made upon defendant a formal demand for moneys due him and defendant to such was waa snyders story on the stand today jt it was a little shaken by cross exam and both sides have started out for cery inch of 0 van taso tago ground som same interesting di dickos clos ures urea are arc expected tomorrow lomo tomo irow |