Show mm MAYOR THROWN mm DOWN council passes tw two 0 contracts over his vetoes IGNORED A COURT ORDER bitter allusions Al luSIOUS made mad to tho the mayor and tho the city attorney in the abo xo de batos preceding action on the vetoes griffin brought in hi on an la in i junction unction but it prevailed not street supervisor called upon to show why ho he should in Office Streets to be ba cleaned I 1 the city council ass aa in a pugnacious mood mead last evening and each member had achia a chip on hla his shoulder As 0 result the mayors vetoes ot of the heath crinkling pr inkling contract and thi the th i pioneer I 1 pon gocr er comp anys anVe lighting contract were overruled and street supervisor pe per r visor mulloy was ordered to show enow cause case why by lie he should in not at be removed train from office for n ll lully disregarding the 9 ti actions of the council nith hh respect ro to 0 various matters in hla his department so unconquerable and fearless was the spirit that pervaded t tho he council chamber that the heath contract was approved in the lie face of oc a lf order from tho the third district court directing mulvey dale stewart eurid and I 1 diehl in particular to refrain from entering into any contract for ih sprinkling of streets with an any y person other th than an J 11 II grimn griffin and ordering the cuy city to show chow cause on july 3rd ard why it should not be permanently front from so BO doing griffin begin beann his injunction proceedings riot last and the hie restraining order was served upon city recorder emery and the four councilmen just before the council convened GRIFFINS COMPLAINT griffin seta gets out in his complaint the am ard to him of a three years contract for the sprinkling of districts 1 2 3 and 5 on may alay 26 ISIS his big contention being that he was entitled to all extra api inkling at 2 43 per block and that this wan waa the tha understanding between himself and the council it la in also alfted that an error was made mad in drawing up that portion of the contract relating to the extra sprinkling the contract contra ct provides that griffin shrill sprinkle the extra streets at 2 43 per block I 1 1 it l at any time during the life iko of 0 this agreement said first party libell request it and he alleges that it should have bave read in pail as follows follos olf at any ally time during the life of tho the a agreement gream t n t the said ald first party shall de determine t to 0 have sprinkled brinkl aret d any adv other streets street v within e thin the of sold said city and not embraced within the sprinkling districts stores aid the salil sald second party ahall limit do euc euch h extra sprinkling inkling at the stipulated price 0 of f 2 3 45 per block etc griffin then sms sets out that the extra sprinkling was done by him last ye year mr which ho he says that the construction cona st Pt then placed upon th tho a contract by the city was waa the same as he be places upon I 1 it t now in conclusion the action of the counell council refusing to allow griblin to do tho the extra mtr r I 1 this season li Is set out anil in ohapa he alleges that ho he 1 I III sustain a large lops loa should d the city be allowed to repudiate its 8 con contract fee his a prayer in 8 that the contract he reformed and that the city be enjoined from awarding any ally extra sprinkling to any other person than him himself belf ile he also alao asks aska that the city he be compelled to re give him the work at the stipulated price and that it show cause ully it should not bo be enjoined from doing otherwise WILLING TO GO TO upon the reading of the summons and d order to show cause callister CalI Ister na oved moved that the matter be referred to the he city attorney and that he br be instructed ted to appear in court and defend the action on behalf of the e city dale lo 10 however suggested sufen ted that 1 the h matter mailer jay over until th the veto was reached and this course was P pursued when the e olo ar 0 was reached dale moved that acal action 1 be postponed for on one week adding that ho was waa heartily in favor of the heath contract but that he be desire to g go lo 10 jail if a VO vote t C for the contract goold would place him b behind e tile bars callister said eald that ho he cars care oh ghether ether dale vont ment to jail a or r no not t and it that ho he favored disposing or of the veto alth without ut further delay mull ey also favored pas ling upon the veto 1 I ant am ready it ho a said to EO to jail if necessary and as 8 wo we nee need tojo this sprinkling we ie ought to d lapone of the matter now judge mckay less aa railed called upon for an opinion SA aa to whether or not tho the are members abers of the aho council would be in con contempt tempt of court lit in the event that they voted to overrule the mayor mayora a veto lie he declined to express an opinion but remarked jocosely joco acty that lie he we object to seeing alv alvo a or 9 alx a of the of 0 the council go t to jail au PASSED OVER tur THC VETO the motion to 10 postpone was waa put and loot ant by fill an overwhelming vote and stewart colled called tor ter trio tho question on tho the mayors eta after some same further ale pleasantry all aur in X aich jail diet was nt at some nome length the he que qu allon shall tho the contract pass pam etc was put and carried ly by the hc f ing roll call vote ar n teas alien ile later dale daj dle blehl h 1 HaYw heyward artl lloyd morris mulvey i and stewart fc lo 10 nay leprohon and newall 1 3 absent abac nto OB ale lears ara and nortney Romny 5 2 on olt motion of stewart the president 1 a of f tho the council was waa then instructed not 1 to sign the contract until the CO court ur t arrs upon th tho mattor matter laica ter la in tho the day the committee on sprinkling recommended that mr heaths deaths offer to do all extra sprinkling not embraced in big former contract lit at 16 per block per week weak be incorporated therein the recommendation was wag adopted THE OTHER VETO TAKEN up the mayors veto of the street light I 1 ing ng contract was aa then read and tho the final question put promising to bo be brief callister Cal llster took the noor floor and as soon as the recorder had concluded the reading of 0 the message mid and discussed the veto nt at some length tho tha cl city t Y engineer he said had drawn a are t many na a ny contracts c a kind and the city had no not t jos loat cent thereby As to the mayors that no option as secured by the city to renew the contract ot at the end of three i yram years mr callaster Cal llster paid that the corn com anition matteo atteo endeavored to secure much buch nn an option a but the company declined to consider conn lder it and the committee waived it ilo also reviewed the other object long urged by the mayor but v as ab unable to a sec any merit in item during lliter hla big remarks mr calllister Cal Cai lliter told eald with respect to ono one of the ch objections j actions 11 1 I think the attorney in IH in error here tile attorney dalo dale inquired welli meant tho the mayor but I 1 guess buess I 1 was right after all canister callister rap replied lied Ca calliger Call later lliter then that the eon tern Plated consolidation of the v arlou companies would doubtless bo be affects affected of at the action taken upon the mayors veto and that to sustain the veto would certainly not prevent the consolidation ills combination he said it if there li Is such a thing la is now lighting tho the adepts at it esgo per light per month for 2 6 lights and we ise nil ivill got get lights light tor for about the same game sum under the contract with rib the pioneer electrio power company in conclusion callister Call later read the contract between the city and the utah power company LS dinwit by the city attorney and contended that it did n not 0 it throw about the c city ILY any safeguards safeguard not found in the contract with ith the th pioneer people WAS VETO it if as charged by the mayor was parting shot the attorney of the pioneer company drew tho the ca contract n lie had the interests of at the city moro more at hoort heart then than the city attorney had when he be drew up the contract b between tile the city and tho utah power er company vany but I 1 want to say aay that I 1 dont believe tho the mayor wrote a line or of this veto it la in tile I 1 language of the city attorney who has hai nover never sub submitted m it ted a respectful communication to this council since ho he has sailed under the norn nom tie de plums plume of james Olen dinnin mayor wo we dont expect anything better of him hono how over na a his language I 1 hlll III hardly rise above bo ve the level ol at hla his ideas dale favored the contract and wn was i unable to sea ace what nhat adata advantage le could possibly accrue to the city by sustain au stala ink inc the veto diehl vas w as of a similar mind although he had bad fought certain i pro colons inions of the franchise at the time of its passage lights at ag G per month each were cheaper than the elty city could light haht the streets with a 91 plant of lui its own and he deemed it best beat to the th contract the contract v was as then approved by a a vote of 11 to 1 newell Js ewell casting casil nir the negative vote leprohon end and romney were acro absent PROVis PROVISION rox FOR RENEWAL nen awat follow ine this action the following communication from the atto attorney r n Y of tho the pioneer electrio electric power c company 0 devany was read salt S ut lake cy city juno june 22 I 1 IW EH cull and other members fare of tire ampro improvement cmunt commette Gentle menThe the pioneer electric power c 0 d arv at n 1501 ax of ILI IIA board 0 ot r arm held in salt lake city this data authorized mn inn to inform your hon hen anable arab orab body that after duo due coald consideration hatim her have concluded th they Y would acres in a supplemental contract to the a ono approved by the city council in i which trio alio contract for light ing tile streets of salt jk J djoko k city wn was t incorporated that tho provision of section 3 in the th original proposed contract should bo be embodied which said ald section 3 reads a as follows se aal 2 3 it il Is hereby t that hat tile tho city annii inn arid shall ahall have tho the ri alchi bt to this thin cri trat t in three yearly tor for a ectal al of at dr atno 1 ot army be ba aft it kid by tho the city council it it chwi nl at any train within three ahr months montha before h foro tho the of this contract dot emine t to 0 renew tta tile being they shall give cravo writ t alii lit notion to tile iho contractors tor oi of such fluch ro IO for ienni period pr tol mint tee for islet ren gronewol al th the city shall ahall give uio cot con tractor motor alitt written n notice as aj provided for tho the ilet rei ical I 1 would like to state to your he honorable body that this clause vas ajla tjay agulto it 1 objectionable buit t to lh pioneer electric ro power w company but all iffy ny have nine birno conc conclude lud fit ed that it if tho the city council 1 la allou this should bo be or rather embodied in the iho ile monta c contract an t r they will makr boako no nn burun I 1 her p rt in varv ve re bpck pacu LEGBAND YOUNG i the communale communication atlon was nas referred to tho the committee on an improvements and the contract will be amended accordingly AFTER SCALP the resolution censuring street supervisor per Por visor mulloy and ordering him to show cause chy tt hy he should not be removed nan man cintr introduced 0 deuced by buckle and vas LM am follows whereas tho the amid thomas F baull mulloy loy V its as S street expired abea tean months an t ran anro on an january A 3 S e T a ald thomas F mulloy molloy as hov n a willful ful disinclination to comply comp P ly with the I 1 ot at tile city con council net I 1 and uy bhonn I 1 hla his Y and un ninfa to nil tile ofelt o of SL sir cut buner supervisor visor in trio fol following ioli inc bucino cases among ganv not noi lit anro ro anum e 0 second west P t tt I 1 in n front f gilt of st marks hospital the brailo rr lo 10 on this ihla was by city in ill gincer fideor young it in ax and the tha street or dr d ded de r d cut lon b by tho city council tho the work m VBA portly partly dona don at a cost of over SW but the lh eca was left train from six alx inches 1 to ww me fact oot above the th ta h 1 ill gri ln in ISM the iho street hauled aed in pinte material rial and filled up the street M hem it II h had d beirn cut do doivo tho buforo fore a and ad it ti is now ow from 15 feet to a 3 toot feet abao ca tie wd covered up bv tho the dopart department ment on art 0 it and I 1 thard monument cut lie limox Is destroyed da troyl at fiant act mad fifth N 1 th end and third south said jat aloe alfo covered up X in 1 a I gamt many viah aln aca so it 19 I 1 to find lelm fourth tho foll were without hot bet 1 in vials t alon 1 of A r ad pied hy by the cily council councel july hi 16 1 and I atlle in in ta forta IZ rolond went wt ninth to tenth north fourth and A t 0 1 fr I 1 and J aLree alreeta tn and a R great many bolh other plue eks Fifth In tho the fall of 1156 hu he had ninth rat last merl graded n between second mid and fifth south in such a manner as to milks ULO the betran banno i far or aehl ring alm during trio of at luat it ho he ilio had the crossings i between the streets named on an ninth east street t hereby subjecting to serious arloua rl oua and inconvenience and an threading the of th this will wt compel at the city to annelid about in low L V the alep emter iroM axi belt it resolved to tn few or of the foregoing that t copy capy of this resolution bo be served upon a idimas F mulloy and ho he bo be required um to appear before council tuesday june D M 8 1 pa in and 1 show he cause why h hafl should raould riot not be from trio ali allies of at street as aj no ho is in making 1 a oft ot tho a same aado resolution N T AD I 1 dale that the aro words ma king a s FIn pears of the tha naf mame ba atrick lama ak on n out as the council bould have to sit al |