Show PRATT IS reinstated TED supreme court puts ri him M back as chief of police 1 I ARBITRARY RY POWER ABATED 1 1 the whole law must bo be given effect arbitrary removal wit without bout V it heating hearing will not be countenanced by the courts Court sUndet under the CIO con rl contended tor for by I 1 the batad portions rort ions of the law coult be annulled the law 0 of ee be VAIS conally stated I 1 ime I 1 the 1 C Kupi cinc cou couil I 1 U ur I 1 iliili tat hlll CI ll da dar 1 h ejde alami lonor I 1 no an opinion lit in iho flit acsa ca a ii arlinr I 1 pra I 1 t liy fly tile hie nip ilie and ami I 1 ila 1 I lioard 1 ala 1 ct I lit r I 1 n or nt this i judge cherry and calno k to boig platt un on mand te act aj M ing him io the lh ini illions wit y linued right ri ill tt i mull anil to ta eu alwy ayt boyl anti anil emoluments if 1 of cout thi pay imy duelm q ito aln 1 I in 1 I SUNIl SL IARY OV OF OPINION the ourt recites rf iti the lh p pint eints int i in A h origin or of the as ap ili ahr I 1 of 0 cliff A I 1 1 sims r 1 ol 01 i 1 I 1 1 A Z 1 c 4 1 I 1 1 1 toola i 1 11 I 1 11 I 1 ali ip I 1 IV J 1 1 I 1 i I 1 I 1 I 1 ill I 1 1 I 1 I 1 4 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 11 I 1 I 1 1 9 11 1 4 1 to N I 1 4 il II k h 1 k k r I 1 I 1 41 41 sa S a TE I 1 Z I 1 5 I 1 bell A it 1 eli 14 I 1 1 I 1 11 N 4 r I 1 FL I 1 k 11 W M ll 11 zt it g r f 4 Z I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2 I 1 I 1 Z I 1 11 1 II 11 J arthur pratt adf of police 3 pinit pi alt confoR confessedly for no ionson fit tin only for the good dij of 0 tile the bet an all the chiefs test inal such auch r il loval the illine or tile the corniL complaint lIntot thi overfilling of 0 tile the I 1 and t answer of the fire anti and police 1 boa anard ral this admitted the removal and aly adsa the a of another c uslice office tile the lower court refus d to lo h M I 1 idenie and held flint at the 1110 I 1 leonrd nia I 1 S the power to di a t A lihou RIG u 1101 notice co charges or bent loin ing I 1 I 1 justice batch aft r the ti of if flit ca arc otis to belive ach nf r of tile HIP COI cobit u IL Th elliRt MaILL 1110 question qu Is 1 helep tinder our lams laks file ind and delici rollo lioard board have power to ia r trot fron office machoul ch harn charlest argest no nn rice pod hiLr henru ig alo alir chief of P lk i or he board insists that under whitlaw thit law or of isas it t may remove bill either S f cause after trial tin nn tit or flit chiw cons entInK in their J judg oil anent tho sooil good ot of tile ter bernice Nice matiy bulmer ved thereby tit th original or lil iani lil far f I 1 lie appointment appoint men of 0 ille chief 19 d shaming oliH sh chath fio ter h in is in to hill dui dumis fit or kuc d beh leha aloi lui mih auth bof belesi other rt hr A if 10 ill 11 p I 1 tiled I 1 tell el I 1 th h act of lilt c if JO A ifon am i 1 L i pealed 1 I the ill law 1 mot 1 is I 1 ibeal in tell gi nr lalin tit t I 1 irani arn lib its this casp its pro for fm tire at OL Is ih quoted lit in the liw lam of oc 18 11 1 1 so c I 1 ii tile one re relied hed oil cm by tire the board for op 11 lii arbitrary power of 0 amoul rm the cc our lod out that tabi con make inake what was int bild for aa it lif tenure into triple meio tenant tfrila nt tit at m LII ill a othi th board for or in buch t ulli emerit ernt I 1 the it pa loi loidia a I 1 NJ iia it UH moie mete pleasure plea suie or capric whit ail ilir illy at any moment still ami nril 0 of public gone kuil may inay remove an olt rev without lt latuk or hearing luti rinK by y simply that lh ill good ot of ll 11 tin service would mould ie be med d theror lilt an 3 n support sup poil of this posit position positron lon it 14 alpo tended that thai tho the law of it biffi recruited the tour four meni bels to t uni toll nuch removal to lo halic hai it valid flit th lay of nt as only required three to concur I 1 but tho the court points out that the lh claudi of the file law ot of 1494 which mallch jai ja i I 1 khall hau not be necessary nik to t state i a an n taun calls for ii 12 the llie notly of 0 t iii h a tion of 0 tile the took runt ling not lot re in the lh tat law of asni thit thil 1 Is n ut or an intent to withhold Ith bold such too the court atlon lection 11 I 1 the filing of ebal 9 1 proa lit complete sy stout or pool pm edul e I 1 i section 14 in 9 to ill II 11 canci can cli Is I 1 ter to ell to tu m 11 nil alsi I 1 ai billea that shall hold thel po pos hUna luon nt at th flit of fit pvc tIve Chie chiffil fil ot 01 a at of if tita board the remaining section fr cllon maleti athly case cagy lii IN till the dilill adlich eli firl 1 I provides that the th chief I hall I 1 jen ert to cusp athlon or removal from 1 ile for fair aai ill by a ate it fin ili I 1 nr ml mi if f ill ih ud ad I 1 nl at all sav I 1 ehni fin and 1 11 pr for ill 1 I 1 anve lit hi gling hn lit M i n liia 1 I 1 I 1 if fa it if a E I 1 n arf noc ill ih ii 11 mill ll alty r ain insi I 1 1 1 i J tile I 1 re 8 ned thol board shai hall at 11 birr one onca tit filfli 1 mini v the of ath ihal V ac i 1 1411 res front from the th oell ill behall ile be removed from 0 office or hau be nuo suspended f from born office without apay I 1 pay for it a fixed period a and cid in a 11 mra a 0 vo vote te n it I 1 three h rt e iii embers of the 1 I 1 1 board shall 4 1 ll 11 bv be sun ident to deter mira brkl thai I 1 ahr it thai I 1 ge ROM are arc unstained t tried anil and to I FIX the by rei removal rno val from OFFICE or othern lr ise the cum houi t rn can aldera fully the effect it ahl this he Q ra r aj C isidero find and concludes corn hides that ihal it lit I 1 ul ter a r full u ii and fair in on oriff t to tie the j borms torms of oc tho lh lai jam tile hie good of the th 14 i r it luL Is if t to ile bo determined and that rho board he hai e gocr pallor to sit an officer only lifter aftel cli argoe alave ilave open filed ant anil opportunity given tile ace accused used to bf be heard 1 CIVES tilt LAW ral I 1 this interpretation A mill ill give i effect to lo i i all the provi lung of tile liitt lam affecting tile casl calv while 0 ilif Cm corutin rutIn coon I 1 1 tended for fat by would enable i t he boan beai il vt to gremli i section 31 11 an at naso luti lute nullity bec auxt tit in ex oscr cory instance bof of tile kihne of cl canik niK tin nn officer 1 iv bv a 0 citizen ibe lh board bould I ait 1 n totaling A as thoman pioN ded bled b by V ili alt in tile at from active under I 1 10 on flit ground that thai tile good ato j 0 tile is arvie evl 0 bould lc bc thereby m title lv in mihly and tn tit truth the gond bond of the ih and thu the public I 1 i iopa iffat bi be ir really injured ali irb I 1 to no liko ll kolm mims burh conkli would I 1 vint nn bidon bolden the lh it lo 10 wholly 1 ilon 17 it 1 ts 4 to pa heiy that fit alif intend d if no bubli rr re tit of an un 11 h ard I 1 in m tinniey to t eori villi tilde of f matual autly Aut lf it 11 mas is tile calt nt I 1 1111 sk if tit 1 confer too mallon i ulo those hieng alef ft 0 1 if I fr tin iol rot for thell liem to set uri uit ill inart 1 C pit cili biot per ail ho i i nd tile put ill noil guild i thi flit cum kill t io rrt rt li it ito an intent it the jut PY y ib ahr legislator I to in or tho thi y pi rdo for far no n nirh i J por po 1 I r can nn lit bf under the like low law I 1 alln 11 1 l 0 nr q ahm I 1 it fiyod olm ing gond itin fill lh hit Is entitled to hold dui ing life unless the legislature I 1 t others li or the incumbent by his lit Q on n ais acts and vond liot hla 1 iosi right fr to it but such fuch Coffel ture cant cannot 1 I 1 be declared it without hal haeng ing bern been and nil an opportunity eh em ell to f v heard in defense or 1 lion linn ol at the matter suggested Is aa to 10 th the e hvisc in f tin tile respondent board having al a lf i u matil to remove n the surn anally It boUL filing chaiR Ct find and eing giving him tit an opportunity to be ba heald Us its at ai lion hon a null fruit and auld anti and created crea td no to lu quinvy anny Invy tile appellant iLip clIant ones aa there i loll 1011 to lo lot in lecog by tile tho J birj ard is as tire the ln ful incumbent and load had the tight to MIge tile hie dutar and 11 lo K calve ull lh of file of IT fi n until lawfully law fully dr or at until in ill omo oin legal way lie ho aeed to bo be tile thu I 1 Ight fill incumbent tile the ingston v of the gosp nd baid tant ihal mand ninus Is not nol the ic cor or eject lect lu ili tire ti court e cl udine luding biting in ill supora sup orl that till tar taij has bas no rI atoll to an a action II etem ili ih lillo to IQ an office tn 10 be t wd hul tile the or oc 1 an I ino perly al I 1 to b in allo mind chihli to to hold nn ili till the buil refill ayn baya it clear I 1 app 41 fr flin oni tile I 1 ecil that propel lint at at Is lawfully upp doted to the hie or of il of chbr of naive of sift 1 aay ell that lit in IV mi its in lilt iho I 1 filho 11 esles chriL bArgell 4 anti and rees ived ind c tho ali inci cat lit h nas ic movel aud and that thai lie if li 14 litlie it I 1 to tile 1 ier office d dr jute juie Ther crole inAnd d Ainu I 1 a proter and the coul auit t d in 11 refusing tit th IN ila the th bauso av Is I 1 oil and ell cd willi 11 oiin tit i grant tit writ ludi alue and ahner c occur concur |