Show MR BISHOPS OPINION answers a query from morgan county I 1 TH TREASUR ERS compensation holds that the official salary covers all the duties of the office and no extra pay can be set aside for collection and disbursement disbursed ent of school funds vs brigham frigham argued and submitted to the supreme court Ho hoeffding effing to is acquitted suit against tho the city attorney general bishop transmitted an opinion to county attorney williams of 0 morgan county yesterday in reply to questions asked him mith w ith reference to tho the apportionment of 0 state anil and county school funds county attorney williams called the attorney generals attention tt 11 section SS of 0 article it 10 of 0 chapter of 0 tho the ians davs ot of isdo anil and asked to two be advised whether the alic county superintendent before apportioning the stat slate e and county school funds to the severo several 1 districts of ills his county as an 1 Is 13 3 therein provided set aside among other items hems in an amount sufficient clent to pay the compensation of 0 the county Tica surer for the collection and disbursement ot of said fund also calling attention to a communication from the state stale superintendent in of public instruction to the county superintendent of schools dire directing eting that no deduction should be made from the said school fund on that account ATTORNEY GENERALS REPLY in cieply to these there questions the at torney general says walio it li is truo true that the words the life treasurer ale uw used in said Pec section lection tion I 1 ism am inell inclined ned to falco tile same flame view jet of tile tho subject 01 that announced by the state superintendent ot of public instruction 1 1110 I ho old law provided det that tile tho compon to tie be allowed to tho the assessor and treasurer for collecting tile tho school moneys should bo be deducted before the apportionment thereof was made by tho the counte super superintendent n t but under the law at t thill time lime it a d different prevailed from rom that which must ot of vw ce sity pre voll vall at ill chrt present flout under our constitution and livi lans vs the present law hies fixes thea alio comp compensation oll or of county treasurers Treasur ers in 11 a defillipe lite sum and also ise provides that ll it shall he full fall compensation for all services vices ot of boly kind and description if any charge could bo be made against tile the state mind and county school fund it would have to bo be in fit tile tho nature ot of a fee and would be required to be paid into tho the county treasury along with fill other fees and as an officer he would wool not h ho 0 1 entitled I tl ZI e it to it for ills his own use arid and benefit cenell 1 awn am unable to discover any provision of liw jaw which would auth authorlee orue any such fee to bo be charged by the treasurer CAN MAKH NO t Q CHARGE the law requires him bhim to collect these tax lasers 9 and it belne being a dull I 1 thus bus imposed by law it 1 was as doubtless ill tho e intention of tile legislature when it ft il led the denn Ho lle salary as coin pe for all ac services r performed to include this among the other lat duties in training title new liw law tile the legislature evidently copied largely front roni the old law wherever its provisions did not conflict with the now new polier al adopted opted and in doing so it II may that the words the er crept in inadvertently I 1 am of opinion considering the whole law upon this suba subject t together that it was nas the intent of 0 tho the legislature that county treasures 9 shelf perform all the I 1 duties IULI respecting tile anti and disbursement bur ot of the state and county 0 n ty school fun funds l under tinder tho the compensation 10 1 I 1 prodded pro ded and that no extra charge should bo be majo a g tile said fun tunas for thin purpose prior to their apportionment by I 1 tho 11 a county superintendent SUPREME COURT HEARING case of vs birgham argued tile the supreme cobit ivard heard arguments lit in the hie case ot of jacob a appellant P against nat M N yesterday and took tile mattor matter under advisement vi this Is an appeal from a judgment of 0 nonsuit non suit entered by judge street the contention of the respondent Is f that the judgment was rightfully granted because two no evidence N vias cla introduced by lid I 1 lal litiff to entitle him to recover the kult hule wasi isas brought to lo reco ccker fer 00 damages for the alleged illegal conversion by marshal brigham of certain per personal senal property belonging to betro retro ittai hoefling is acquitted if T Ho 1 vi as tried lit in tile el bilm till inal division of the court ses berday tor for i totaling matins the state game c jai lawe E this Is an all alip appeal 11 froin justice harveys court tho the accused sti was mas tried convicted and sentenced to pay a line fine of SA 50 and 2820 costs tile the alleged rime crime la is said to have been commatti d on march 16 1896 on oil velch date Itne hoefling fling Is charged with hin baling ing shot willil ducks be belicen ticen and one hour beaole sunrise the ill e complaint charging tile the defendant wah ill the crime ins smoin to befaro justice harvey by F i H rudy tile til jury brought in ili it a verdict of 0 acquittal suit against tile the city A suit nult lor for damages dama gelf Is has a been brought by mohr iagal ng lit salt luke city tile i allegra that on oil august 10 30 while 1 lie l e nas driving a bay aagon over that of hedw redwood 0 oil load which chich li Is within the alty limits ho he vas matl front from hla his 1 fell icle on oil account ot of the bad state ot tile I 1 lie highway and severely injured injure A to hla his clu damage niage lit tile the above named amount farrell vs ilief J judge cherry Is healing tile tho suit ot of J XV farrell H co against anton rief this action was blought to ici cover tor for material furnished and labor performed on OIL tile the agricultural college at lokan logan the defendants conti contracted acted to do the iho work and era employed aloyed the life plaintiff who nho also furnished 1 large amount or of material verdict for A verdict tor for the plaintiff tor for was returned by tile the jury in tile ca case 90 of oc A holt sons son against fox watson co thirty days stay slay ot of proceedings was awas granted krantek to Prep prepare Lre and serve statement on motion for a new laj trial ai coat orders and notts notes state stale no e lewis L Birmin birmingham griam continued linued until monday state vs RAY hay curtis et ct al dismissed state is a E I 1 W hoes hers petit larceny defendant withdraws plea of not guilty and enters pica of 0 guilty ordered to appear tor for sentence january stith michael ritz eitzgerald gerald vs charles carter order alpo lifting C M hull dull r ret f pree to take testimony ond and report 70 to the abe court 13 0 lee iee vs a joseph mirlon marlon continued charles charlea burton lias has sued C 11 kratt kraft to recover SUM on a note suit has also been I rought brought ty by S it II auerbach isaac woolf wook for on a note bothwell Mi IsIc Conaughy have on sued ed hugh A arnold and r p 0 1 witch for on an a note and morte aire |