Show IN SUPREME COURT conison Mo Mor nison liscon Zi merrill errill case argued j hays hay a and Heig nefer also two cases were argued and submitted at yesterdays yester days ot of the supreme couil the fust filet hie elie case of S IV W borrson Mor Al edward men mcgrill samuel merrill a nd thomas A kent doing business as hairlson Hoir Aloir lson merrill co I 1 ani and respondents vs D IV gamblr josiah C williams and john anders anderaon on defendants and respondents respond enta and the intermountain inter mountain salt sail company dc defendant and appellant la Is an appeal from a judgment ten dered acred in favor of the plaintiffs an and d defendants fend fOnd ants john anderson and josiah C williams and against the defendant company this Is an action brought by plaintiff to foreclose a sub contractors lien upon the ilia properly of appellant for matei lais furnished one D AV gamble the cori ginat contractor tho the answers of tile the other defendant josiah C williams who uhn fill the plaintiffs are mado respondents in this appeal set up sub contractors liens upon the same property each claiming priority and seek beck foreclosures fore closures judgment was rendered rancourt lit in the trial ourt court c in favor of all the respondents except D IV gamble camble v mho he did not appear and against this appellant richards richards nic bards tire attorneys for the appellant and attorney Y J IT 1 bowman BoN magg appears for the respondents HAYS AND the tour four cases in which jennie E hays Is appellant and A 11 II ll ennefer rebecca A dame bunie james biln and cella celia SI campbell r respond enta were also argued and bu the actions were brought to quiet title to certain eel tain real estate under see unit llou compiled laws ot of utah the complaint alleges title in too in ill tins tile plaintiff toy by an adverse possession since 1876 as against the defendant defond int in answering it Is alleged by plaintiffs that eliat the catlie lot in ili question belonged to the estate of 0 the late abra hun hain hays the cases were referred to jude howat howal as leforce lef erce and he found that the defendant hall had no right or title to tit the a land was aas entered in the district court according to these findings and it Is front from this order that tills hill appeal Is taken |