| Show injunction JUNCTION DENIED JUDGE WILL NOT PROHIBIT RAILROAD RATE KATE WAR WAB the tha lechl ical point feint taken was that till nil parties necessary to tho suit Sui were not noc Tres ClIt charleston S C AUK aug 21 lodge badge st sl monton of tile the united states court today filed 1 hla l fe ilari floii I 1 in it the th suit of i injunction bro brought ight by trw the port royal ai A jiel oad st the southern starra freight ro clation to prevent vent tho ilia latter fron fro n tho the SO 60 per cit in rates declared tk hy by it in it for or a 33 per cent cant deduc ilan pl by the tha seaboard air line the nv lollin decision dissolves the injunction an and d the 1111 oil grounds of no DO jurisdiction ua all pirri lies necessary neo essary to tile the case were ivere riot not pre stent in court the vital point r of 0 the slon la 19 as aa rot lows iowa it if this case were to proceed wid it should be held that the L t hoail should hoi il lemu cind the georgia carolina northern kall oad company should be restrained from carrying goods at the rate flod by the Sc seaboard aboard tind and Roar roanoke roke and raligh eastern its lessees lessels les sees the tl c order r ot of injunction would ab abrogate rogata this part of the contract and to this extent mould deprive tho leses ot of the property in kase could the court abrogate rho th caad on grounds imite there without hearing the lesless as ai a i parties in the care could th court invest investigate lg tte corporations and convict them at 0 the charges in their abs absence enoe aro ara not flat the th interests of tho the georgia carolina northern norther rl and the two liboro roads inseparable 15 J so their arronco art an obstacle lit in the way of 0 the dacree chait 13 inseparable ario after citing the allegations alle gallons ot of thi the bill the court says arlys ot at tile the question presented that heso allegations did not seok seek at the hands of 0 the court the regulation of 0 rates but asked its inter tience to prevent demoralization and especially they have argued that tho the was waa anil and the th inevitable result 0 f a war of 0 rates atsa i would be tho the bankruptcy of t one or the other ot of the competitors peti tors and so tho the end of the competition owners ownership hip in railroads differs from that in every other species ot of property A railroad la Is as it were public property and as its first duty Is to the public the iho owners call refute service to n no one and the charses charges must be uniform in no case can they go beyond what la is 1 just and reasonable and in the IM last it I 1 resort the tha state and federal authorities cart can determine nhat n hat charges axe aro beai rear i |
