Show relations of the eye eya and brain in sight it Is sometimes cited as it a remarkable circumstance that we see things right side up although the imago image thrown on tho the retina la Is upside down professor brooks seems to share this popular opinion tor for he writes recently in science we all believe many things which aie inconceivable such as the truth that the image in our eyes la Is upside down in the next number of the same bame journal october bilth a correspondent spon dent signing himself J C 1 I probably prof J mckeen Ic Keen cattell Cat toll co laments comments on this statement as follows but why la Is this inconceivable to those having knowledge ot of elementary physics it la is inconceivable that the image should not be inverted perhaps prot prof drooks brooks meant means that it Is inborn incomprehensible that we should see things right side up when the image Is upside down this Is sometimes urged but would seem to te be answered by a remark once made by lotze in tile the presence pre ienco of the writer it any one la is troubled by the fact act that the image Is 13 inverted let him suppose that the soul stands on its head it I 1 7 indeed quite as reasonable to suppose that the mind stands mauds on its head as to suppose that it stands on its ita feet and looks at the image on tile the rellna aich would seem to be tile the to those who aro are troubled by tho phenomenon A similar paradox to is the fact act that with two dmares maces on the retinas retinal we see eee things singly this may also be treated without by the question it we hear bear a baby crying with two ears cars why do we not think it la Is ta twins ina |