Show MUM MULVA 1111 GOES TO JAIL hill rich variety of U unexpected happenings in court JUDD GETS RID OF SADIE the woman Is acquitted sat her husband would not mot swear who owned the money and andl jewels find and was sent to the tha pen an allday all day bay bout boit between the attorneys and the public prosecutor the memorable catastrophe that oc cultrea when the hie monkey aud and the parrot came together was quite in judge Bart bartolis Bartch clis 8 division of 0 tho the third district coutt coult yesterday similar proceedings ce have probably never been witnessed in a utah court all day long ions tho the public prosecutor struggled sled to disentangle from the web VO so cunningly woven hy by the host yf law yi ra who le presented the tha barlous parth alea ies involved in the celebrated case casa of oc the le people va charles valentine find and was in but a do wrev tle tile defendants wore were acou of etoal ing ll lil in cash and jewels from the comans womans husband after acier the smoke of uie the day conflict had cleared away it was found that the husband had been sent to tile the pen for contempt and his wife ulfo had been acquitted while valentine Is still ta in tile the air the public prosecutor who had bad been goaded anil and badgered hy by halt half a dozen doen lawyers from until slight was an feeling somewhat demoralized and the tha cout t was weary a alia ails end and valentine were during the day and the woman arrested but the warrant was subsequently withdrawn tile the hearons lf if such it may be called was a mixture ot of high tragedy and farce comedy and tho the miscellaneous assortment of eu curious alous m minded I 1 tided people who flocked d into the courtroom to catch a glimpse or of the fair sadle sadie and her ter former mirse verc ire amply repaid for their trouble THE PARCE OPENS the fun full began shortly after 10 when C 8 varlan varian represent ins ing stated to lo tile court that ills his clant lad had been summoned to appear bufore the grand jury and andi the tha attorney continued I 1 suppose it Is generally known aliat lit ric lip he Is summoned sum boned there to give testimony against Clip charles rles valentine and his wife and I 1 will ask the court to instruct the grand brand jury that he is not a st competent witness this brought judge judd to his feet with wilh the e declaration that the grand jury wanted malvaney to give evidence against charles valentine who was charged chapped with having COMMIt committed Eed adultery with hl his Mul wife at this juncture sir mr stephens objected on behalf of sirs mrs Mul vancy to her husband lius band being compel compelled letl to testify before tho the grand erand jury as he could not testify st Valen valentio tao without testifying against his wife NOT A COMPETENT counsel for then thea stated that thea the question aest I 1 on before beffi the coui chui t was whether bather N or not st a husband hus bandor or wife was a competent witness to give testimony against an alleged paramour where the iho evidence would tend to incriminate the other and over the objection in this case of 0 both husband and wife lie also insisted that under the circumstances was not a competent witness judge judd retaliated by stating that tho the proceedings again lIt valen valea tine and sirs mrs AIu laney had ben bean instituted by the comans womans husband mho ho insisted upon the grand jury taking the diat matter t er up ADMITTED HE DID WRONG 1 I 1 am satisfied now the judge in substance that I 1 did wrong in 1 sli ali dwing tile case to so go before the grand jury and in the tha governor to lo issue 0 u a a to bring the d defendants t fen back but my only excuse e la is that I 1 did not then know the kind of 0 j people I 1 had to deal with after rome further discussion thin matter at er was v s postponed until 10 this his 0 and judge bartch stated that a determination to of the matter of the hie main case john al zane ane objected to any postponement pon ement of at the grand larceny cases mr stephens attorney tor for mrs mul nl 1 vancy joined with mr jr zane in insisting bilt tile the be proceeded with air valentine bald mr stephens could riot not be guilty of ada adultery aitery with mrs mra units binl sg she wn guilty but he could be guilty of grand larceny ceny while she plan might be innocent judge dartch wearily well the clerk may vall rail a jury deputy clerk cleric loomis performed alila a ilice l I li i his U usual SURI happy manner mainier and through the careful questioning of john if zare zane it was leagued bluit none of the jurors enjoyed the uc tie qu almance IA u elthier valentine of it sirs its lul vaney y neither thad hal any of th the 1 jurors iniel or expressed an opinion re girding abe merits of the case cage prosecutors the which charges the wl with th having stolen in it cash and jewelry to the value of 1100 front Tri grionias onias F P on dac december 1 1394 was ichon read after judge judd kald ald it if our honor Plent lil casc SP it Is now 1 IS and I 1 TV osk ik alias illio court to Is allow me until 2 0 clock C to talk with my witnesses mr stephn Steph riis n suggested ut rested that there was only one upon the tha basic back of tho ludI indictment cLinent baft judge judd 1 I tove have othor othir wit nene john 11 vi all we insist upon knowing who ho they are judda judd whores Wh tren your statute st stute snow show it TW and I 1 will ill tell you sir mr zane the 2 rule ule thai atiat aepli applies as to this ibis matti enatt r I 1 lis older thin than any isita tute judge Judd Slight I 1 lesl 03 it if tt it Is older cader than you are mr zatic Zan cres fes sir it ft Is even odder cader than iban you iou i ou are flaughter ri court was then adjourned until 2 lat at which hour the case wa was 1 taker taken up in earnest by judge judd callins thomas homas Couii sel for thereupon asked that sir be sworn on ills voir dire to testify regarding this to testify in ill the cue caad judge judd insisted that tie be lasso be sworn is as a witness and boll oaths oatha were administered THE MARRIAGE mr hafi W then asked by iris 2113 attorney it if ile he was the husband of fit set kadio dao M and he replied that he was at this point judge judd registered on an proto irl again st 1 ills witness being taken away froin il him im and the attorney ravo gave the ehe right of way wall to the tha public prosecutor tho the stated he wa was s married to che defon dalit at Grave gravesend send N X J in 1393 by a preacher lie he was not P etive however that he was a preacher and did not have the marricco marr iaco 3 certificate homr it your honor pleast plea eolia Is alit judge judd in a triumphant ton lone 0 1 if I insist that under the laws of new york which I 1 have here the ilia marriage has not been shown judge judd then began to argue the proposition when tio aas aa interrupted by counsel tor for tho the wit nen who buted that tie faa desired to ask sir mr a few ew questions go sald did judge judd rath a waive vf cf his hand mr then asted that he w was is marri married led by a roan loan whom lie be supposed to br be a preacher and aid had lived baull his hh wife since that time they were given a marr laffe I 1 which was indoe tu to the ot of 1 airs u I 1 branic K if liena at t oi ali time rn on nn an objection ri nl f or of mr it AT Ul vincy ValleY to tier her bus luand being lowed to A t t alon waz wai then ihan edini 0 o f the 1 f b by t the b e dc that both yul Y find WO wife ohai tj to 10 mr VAlley I 1 r C D p called upp appi in in tile cat can mid that strict evidence a n 10 to lo their b lib husband nuil nud v ito V 1 KS as nil ile cd fuere judd initiated lint it il had rot not been leown that Mul vancy was hiir anar ried as 24 no ei e donee denoe had been to dhow abat the roan man wili wil i pori irined tile was v aa au an to do so ao J I 1 raid judge judd jui id not act as a preacher mycola or tny tay brother zino hore here act as 03 a preacher but me s be preachers P all 11 ih the samo same 1 they oars introduce mr valentine if they trant tu to or mrs airs Malva nr to lo prove the marriage valentine may have introduced the pre to th the var cartei tc tind cind W he may have given the beitle away mr st phia who held the marriage marr lairo certificate of the ilie parties jn fit his land hond then that judge juji firlit slot not know whether he wu wai 1 married by la a regularly ordained Tir preacher or not and OB its tor for that matter there ani might bt bo be very few of us who do know mr stephens said in conclusion well I 1 know judge judd declared at al thin time judd asked mr fr stephens stephena b to liand hand him the lie certificate 1 I 1 will not do anything of the kind answered anaw i L n WO red ered mr stephens 1 i SQUABBLE OVER judge judd then wenz to J judge powers from whom mr air stephens 11 yul sc aei cured the lle certificate and aind requested him to pet get it duj cudse 0 o rowers flowers allied sir mr stephens to return the document but that gentle man hastily deposited it in ark an inner pocket and refused to deliver it it wall wai that judge judd called judae powers to tho witness stand and asked aled lint him it he ate brought the marriage certificate of it tile parties into court as ordered by it a sub subpoena poona 1 it I did answered judge powers will you produce it 11 1 I will it if mr stephens will return it mr stephens Il handed landed the document over to judge powers and judge judd then raid bald will you liand me the not unless I 1 nm am ordered to do so by the court judge powers ansec answered red the judge then stated to the court that the document came into ills ails possession as counsel for mr and ho declined to deliver it unless the court ordered him to do so judge judd insisted that lie he had had bad the papers lit in its hla own possession for some ume time past part and only returned them to judge powers u few days ago and upon tho the latter admitting that fact toe he was v as ordered to 10 deliver them to the prosecution mul aney was again called to the stand and stated that he was the man mentioned in the certificate and that his wife was the woman WANTED TO GET RID OF HER now your honor said judge judd 1 I ask that the case against mrs airs sadie be dis dismissed missell mr stephens I 1 object to a dismissal of the caw case I 1 upon a verdict ot of acquittal judge judd all right I 1 want to get rid dofher 0 iier somehow and I 1 am not par tiu lar about the ani ins the verdict of acquittal was uw therefore returned and mr w was again called to the witness ut stand island DECLINED TO ANSWER ills attorney then stated to the court that tho the witness would decline to an nver any questions on the ground that it would tend lend to ito incriminate himself il how w incriminate ate him demanded judge judd hotly we decline to state answered counsel for the witness it was stated that had bad testified before the grand jury and if compelled to testify again his evidence might tend to criminate him the inference intern nce being that he ails had te fled falsely concerning tho the ovner oner ov ner ship of the property properly tho the proposition was argued at rome borne length laid overruled and judge judd proceeded with the examination of 0 the w atness where did you come from rom when you camo came here was asked from a train was the answer what t train D R IV I 1 think then testified that he end and his wife wafe and valentine came west from Phil philophia aphia how much money di a ld d you ihal hare e when en you arrived in salt lake 9 audro judd finally asked attorney stated that lie he we would uld have to ito advise the witness not to answer well eald judge judd jadd 1 I expect to prove by him that the property was his tile the question was again put to tul andee and lie declined to we ask hit she witness be commit tell until he Js ready to answer said J judge go J judd udd judge zane yana Iris insisted isted that tho the witness abdula d not iw be compelled to answer rt stating that if should answer flint the property belonged belon to hia mother or ills ilia wife or anybody else it crould aou id tend to a to him 1 I 11 have ruled on ith the same question a number of 0 unies judge judee zano zane said ald in fit conclusion nut that I 1 ever c vcr heard of interrupted judge judd well retorted judge zinc zane you yo U may not mot have dt it seen seems S tint tbt I 1 cannot make you ym understand ane 1 ROW I 1 MUli VANET it was then ordered that be committed and a nd judge judee judd asked that the case be postponed over from day to day until the witness was ready to tin ro sitter aft er john II DI zane arose lat at this time anti and inal insisted sted thit the case be proceeded with the lial hall delfied tile clearing licari nR in every conceivable Tri manner anner and forbearance forb varance had ceased to bo be a lr fr tuo tua judge judd fourth of july orations dont go heie hc ic there jq Is a case before batore the court and it cannot be proceeded proc code until this willi williese esi answers as I 1 cannot prove the corpus delic delicot lt by any other witness I 1 ask anil it bo be postponed L from day to day SURPRISED BY ZANE john M zuie zine Z uie then spring sprang a surprise upon the bourt court the prosecution sund and everybody else by moving that the case against valentine be dismissed as it was a joint often onename so and the jury had returned a verdict of 0 not guilty against co they are jointly indicted mr zane urged and if mrs at u imaney Is not gurity it naturally follows follow s that vantine is not judge jude judd declared that sir zanes view lew of tahe ahe matter malter was ridiculous and tile the court eventually luok ilbok the motion under advisement sir mr zane hen objected to the jurors bolno allowed to separate but bue thy objection was overruled overs wed and the jurors were excused until 10 delock this snores dog was turned over to the united states stales marshal land and taken to the pen penitentiary I 1 INDICTED AGAIN the grand jury came into court du during the afternoon and returned elfrits indictments four under the lw laws of the and four amder untied united laws jwo of the indictments wore were against mrs mra sadle sadie al and valentine Valc nUne and mrs Mui vaney wad waa place d under linder arrest by a deputy mar lilar the charge charf rc against her being adultery with valentine f after the had been callej to the attona attention on of the court however the he warrant was reca recalled I 1 oil and mrs airs muli i was a allowed I 1 lowe to return to her hotel it is presumed though tint that she will V ill be ar aie ested sled this drig the indictment ag falast valentine obal olia iBes 9 OP hlin him with fornication the grand errand jurors Our aurther blier reported that they bliey lad had ignored the charge of grand larceny against lUl Iv lburn |