Show rood 0 0 I 1 3 TITLE A for judgment argued bea fore judge Il erritt 11 B in motion for judgment on the plead I 1 nta a in the case of alma airna S indall bendall vs a 3 jag ja IcAl llster was argued before J julge judge Bt merritt erritt yesterday le bone of contention in the action J I 1 ish title to the office of inspector or of 1 for salt lake laho city and the ekter sa ati has been from the third district arc t court to the elie supreme court and batic balc I 1 again gandall gan aall was appointed inspector ot of P pr 1 s 1 0 na tor the city on november 11 IS 8 9 2 on I 1 november 21 1893 the mi t or removed kendall and appointed A C Y youna to in succeed him young VI turned down by tle the council and lat doin lal r J G ister was wa i appointed to ar thi position I 1 alu n A and nd by the council after r r that t ody body had declared the on e vacant I 1 in the lower E 0 v 2 court kendall began an as an agalos g I 1 iv Allister fr the asur p liu it on ot of hia hi kendalls Ks claim in that tle mayor and council di did d I 1 11 no have haa th lh power to remove him ex I 1 for baue A amui dori iiii was eusek tal III ELI cd and the tift appealed to the 11 S bu acme C urt whore it was held that I 1 thi ill ar had no right to reins demave ve ki 11 dall and that the council having ii right fallad to cx excise ll it lawfully Y al nas at alo 0 held that there wa no va lccy in the elie allec at ai the time lime of lie bic all aj appointment and irence the salt bait nt lit was v a void the juds judg tat was revor reversed sed and aal tiie the ca caffe e remanded reman did fit I 1 since the ca caad s was Ilass 41 upon by the elie court city attorney hose hoge hai ha iiley alle an answer fur Ilo AllIster in h th nii terdal allegations allce allana of th are arc denied it Is also aloo lit al kmil that the term i 0 ollace at the time time liti I 0 r a p p 1 had bean ilow by din so that it would ex III pit 11 on the tight hasday lit in april 1891 18 an all sub wan changed so go that t the h terra term or of office aiu e bugan buffan on me first 16 in F february I 1 biary wt hence judie judi e how 1 bid hild hi ld el that thai mcallister ical later hav in appin appointed ted on january ia nuary 2 IV d gum d L tl li i tile the oillie at the ex cx pi lion of api dalls tern I 1 re Soan acker for beawer this his theory and in oriald that as mcallister had never beet legally ap palmed pAnted lie could not hav any right to tl the e aice 0 ce whet wh ellier her he alln turin had ed or SOL ool T th iao dilso held that IC cadalla ca dalls term of M il rol not oti the i until tota 1 a tl jal that under the ruling of the rp T e court h was mas entitles to ira im L te r e i n h tatt e t aits nits kler alk alie ar arguments gu r n e were concluded juura juiia look the matter under arder W SHORT atrick ryan et el al vs 0 J salisbury et al d na at plaintiffs cost coat macan international company vs s hinry dismissed olter ams airas et il if vs union pacific A company ft t al plaintiffs given I 1 lave abc to file volume aul 1 e N no 4 of ie 10 cc cirii ri r ird as arinia facie evidence boire arg W ogleby vs va IP IL 1 I bishop re ferri 1 1 I to referee to take lake inon P 1 machinery 1 I aimery company Coin pony vs dla r niona 1 i ln Corn vany et al latend in al allo loved until october BE ath to an awa irist national Nat lonD dank of dead Dc adwood oil Vs v atti L Croas nian 11 lc a days to an er jun b of wales I 1 was admitted itt to |