Show TIM IHS GEOrS SECK beaz o short orders AR entered alit abe case of 0 the aint T N nt lonal bank of deadwood S K D the groes ack company and is stockholders t i vs as taken up before judge zene zane yesterday morning upon an all order on the defendants to show cause the plaintiffs allege that ihna they loaned certain of the th stockholders of 0 the earn com jany large sums burns of money between december 1892 1692 and rebr february uary and took as collateral becu ic curlly rity 1250 shares of the capital stock of 0 the corporation 1 later there was wan a default lit in tho the pay went of the and the said I 1 shins of stock were sold and bought in by the plaint plaintiffs Lills it is then alleged that by various wrongful and improper ads on the part of 0 the directors and of 0 the said raid company tho the capital lock lias has been impaired and conver converted oil in private uses and that ilia shares halt hae depreciated in value until thy they are not worth to exceed 15 each in this connection the plaintiffs aver that john A AL president of 0 the I 1 company was permitted by the dl I 1 I 1 rectors hectora of the company to convert to use seventy shares ot of stock or of deseret national bank to tile the value r tTO i lid block being A 1 l part of the bowis ot of the aid company the well knew new that john A groes cwb k ti vas as insolvent other irregulars lift are re then set up tip and it la Is audition ally alleged that the hoard board of directors I 1 ard met and declared a dividend of per cent per share ana that 0 shares of stock were wrongfully distributed in tho the payment of t said dividend in view ot of the fact that on the said mentioned date dale the company had no assets and was poa rosed ol of no property in excess or of its ita capital stock of 0 moomoo MOO MiO and were led to borrow about that time it la Is then alleged on information and boiler belief that hat the company Is I 1 about to negotiate loan in the main cum ot of and give I 1 a 1 mortgage upon its ita real estate when in fact there 1 I 1 no necessity for berv borrowing aw over 1790 I 1 hence the plaintiffs prayed that the I 1 declared on august be declared null and vold void end that the albares of 0 mock distributed upon the mine bt be surrendered and cauce oled ltd lec also that the defendants be leahr strained lorn transferring or ln in r 1 na any n Y of f the shares ot of stock block lawi to them u upon a the dividend men j 1 cloned and ana tb that A t the officers be retrained from by in 0 I 1 t rao pc or otherwise the real estat fi tato 0 of still clr corporation and from I 1 the sum ot of OT com flarried fla triEd ll Bl of tho the defendants deny the material 4 Ut Milons and net act up in substance tance that I 1 I 1 ihl atty are arc abundantly able to conduct their own business thoy they also told hold A that the minority li in attempt liu to 31 warn rn the th majority majo ity ot of the r and til submits tuh raila that iho he tears lcara thus inua shed W ive ire not a legitimate cause of 0 aci i I 1 tor in n they chev further deny 4 tt lat they ata r it a loan of j X LAAN or that they wish to secure a A in that amount tat hearing fc arane yesterday was upon the tha ter ot of the plaintiffs that the dei I 1 etim b 1 r alnea from disposing X or cr the chares ot of stock I 1 bill to them by virtue of 0 the th dh idena and aad of 0 Inc the th ral il estate by mortgaging it ta for a laan to V I 1 WM was proc tda mith until r b the tha afternoon when hen the tha GO evl ill act ru cioaca era and the caso case went 11 I 1 i train milk monday ulten it wm will be t atwuil uit solm sel ORDERS I 1 W lila gl vs har ilaray cy hardy it al i twee decree ot of foreclosure in favor avor ot of li wourl S guardian vs A LL it 4 et t al t same order I 1 lavid alil vs caroline carolina belth et ct p demurrer ili duricr overruled and ten felt days waw cr 0 etith wlm in 18 1 v 8 james W pitts tt ot I 1 tip withdrawn and unal do dc 00 aticy list to answer i 0 i A 1 k ludawn v va andrew anderson tt ot 3 over overruled ruleA u led arld leave to A complaint PW billam TS to McK mckenzir enzio co pleadings mua EHr i 11 abd default of certain dei ic 0 A lAlis entered t k al sida at tofee a arthur et t ill aar ma ey aalt itt in favor of 0 lor for 1 it ma john ILL ditz vs annes WM U r Thomp nn tos LZ ehalt t ot of cartain oni eni H at vs hamilton U IL for P InI booth nors appointed guardian 3 I 1 I 1 43 r SS it loa george ke va W car J y lio in 1 l favo r of t plateaux tor for katt G shan non vs angell aros judg I 1 f W ILlin tift for 11 11 A Cu MISSIONER i in 1 the i li 0 all W of demedin De adion medon cd ion flartley artley Il I 1 jj nt ions S A st 1 toll 01 in 1 which la 11 judg w w read n in kivor or oc the on i da no L 1181 1601 smalls th the d fen for and dd y fondant dant was by yesterday or i C Ail bakin zabo to WW leto t etore a IL i ditro 1 burvia ment on I 1 1 y iro 13 ea E a lit izue tt TE G oder der peati y 4 upon the h amila ii of 0 IL ares on I 1 S fat a ac in r of tile firm nn who lit S Is anito ake af hn ito has bad 1 4 belief t that t st t from rom fortain property not iv elocution chuon CT Uon P afu i ta which ho un I 1 I 1 4 artely amply tor the sit it 11 I 1 r i i on of said judgment to alt it two valuable diamonds used exclusively for to pel personal vonal ornament THE GROCER car the case of lite utah grocer Co company mally vs va SI cLaughlIn filin co was nd before Tt referee efre J 11 II harris yesterday till on supplementary proceed ings tie the entire day was int apont in n nr guing th the e folik on ai to whether or not 0 C lockhart should he bo compelled to turn over which lie ho admitted having in his ha to apply upon apoll the of the credi creditors torn and pits in the afternoon judice beld that flint lik hi should find ordered the money paid into court |