Show MOT hot MUCH OVER A the goolds boolds sue for and recover VERDICT AGAINST THE CITY motion in behalf of trent to lift tho the attachment of front X chalmers against his property for the anchor in Timot timothy lYT J sullivans suit salt against it short orders r buith district court the damage suit of 0 john G goold anil and wife agair against tilt salt lako lake city in which the plaintiff demanded JudT judgment ment la in the turn sum of MOD lla tor for nill injuries re ceded by mrs goold was argued bocol 01 a judge zane yesterday morning aal submitted to the he jury jarr after considering the matter for or ft a chott time that body returned into court with ft verdict verdic in favor of 0 the plaInt plaintiff lif for THU TRENT ATTACK attachment MENT the next matter of importance taken up was the motion of 0 the defend defendant an t to dissolve the in tho the 21 sult suit of oc frasar chalmers Chal vs L C trent late agent abent of 0 tile the company mr trent alleges in tile his motion for or the dissolution of the attachment that it Is not true trite that tho the pretended indebted cletis n sa a rt t orth forth in the complaint and in the affidavit for or attachment was raud fraud contracted ile he further alleges th that a t sic lie was the agent and manager of the company and one of the directors and as an such euch agent and manager lie he bad charge of the ilia business in this city and was to receive and collect money further that the plaintiff company overdrew overdraw its account with him in excess of and upon ilia day mentioned in the complaint he received the check of 0 the mammoth mining company and piled tile the amount sued for to his own credit and deposited the bacall balance cc to the credit of the company thit thero there was no fraud dishonesty or concealment about tho the tran transition transact stion lon and upon jec elving the money ho he notified the other amenta agents of the company at chicago of his disposition or tile the name ITO ho alken ise denies that he has haa ell mosed of a portion of his property with intent to defraud his bis creditor and prays that tit alie e attach attachment anent be dissolved upon the th grou round nd that the affidavit upon it 11 was issued Is 13 untrue and false in every particular so BO far an it chaiees him with fraud or any indebtedness to the company E eown crown own Hc appeared for the motion anil bennett Mor marshall ishall bradley to lit in opposition to IL 11 tho the hearing continued until late in the afternoon when the matter was submitted SHORT ORDERS joseph vs the ano nyme des mines do lexington thirty days additional time to file statement on motion tor for a new trial as formerly allowed extended to read jannary esth unity brown vs james brown decree of divorce in favor of the plaintiff john R bothwell vs patrick ryan et al debrea of foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff with as attorneys fees sidney vs v adelaide hampton e ct t a al I 1 IT E 1 booth ap appointed P hinted gu guardian ardlan ad 11 iltem 1 am for minor being first national bank of de deadwood adwood S D vs the groesbeck company et ct al order to chow allow cause continued for ono one week georce C vs john I 1 P L larbell judgment in favor of for JUDGMENTS ENTERED john S Cl Ilmore vs L D kinney et at al judgment in favor of plaintiff for wl 33 don dan C tufts is L G blardy et 04 aa judgment tor for plaintiff tor for 1915 and costs ceorge if church vs william gr grom 0 beck judgment in plaintiffs favor for or 1175 and costs CASES DOCKETED tho the following follow cases appealed from lower courts were docketed in tile the third district court yesterday thomas B shannon vs tho the studebaker manufacturing company from justice ornea court judgment in lower court in favor of the plaintiff tor for GO CO richard norrison Morr lon ot et al vs joseph crosby et at al from justice white hornes homes court judgment below in favor avor of the plaintiff tor for J G armstrong vs joseph crosby from pratt judgment below in favor of plaintiff tor for tom assignee ass lenee vs the bur bany angton Mi niver railway corn com lany from justice WhIt whitthorne chorne jud g me mant tit below in favor of the pla plaintiff I 1 for or W GS S n E croger vs J reading from justice resler judgment below in favor of for 37 |