| Show I 1 A MINE PATENT DECISION the lmh do and rattler defeated lly liv tho lii nom kom do alume THE I 1 WELL VIELL ANIME ELECTS DIRECTORS 1 strikes of good gold ore all along the henry Moun taina the now gold camp a on jeff DAT wis peak abe utah ore and A an noto nob and per a 0 no 11 1119 chis the alj civo cao 0 of f the iho an and it eailler lode mining ingolf 9 claims vs the iho nom kon do alame was decided by the th register and beecher a 0 the llie land ofeleo yesterday the contest arose by J A 1 linaman li 04 mall john IV lilo fills and luko application july 27 for or patell for the roadside aud and rattler lodo lode claims lioa situated in gintic tintic dib trial the tha application was refused bo be cause embraced it the ground covered by the nom do di plume claim owned by I 1 mrs A A Elir ehrhard bard DOW cole lion for patent of ct which hil hall already been tho the owners of the roadside rind rattler el illar when clod a for foglu it that work on oil tho the nom om do binnio pinnio had bad not biln dono done for tho the years find ISSO and that the iho ampil callon ati to in hilior TVS poets and abod that the application bo be cin can colod and tho application for the roadside and rattler atler lt ler bo be received and aad mido akdo of lucord in iti ll 11 stead the wu esso wait heard board in 1868 and do aided in favor of the roadside slid and rattler xo no appeal wit was taken irom from this decision and tho ilia application for the yom nom do alume wins as canceled CAn colod on 1 1890 the iho roadside and rattler catl bior yore mido made of 0 record and final certificates yen now gac and 16 7 were issued on oil october 20 29 mrs Elir ehrhard hard filed ao an application to reopen the ca caio go based upon tho the allo alle gaton gaVoni of fraud and aad collusion after an investigation by a agent tho the commissioner ol of the land chico hold tho mineral entries of tile roadside Boa dildo and rattler for cancellation tile tho latos latest hearing was wa called april A 52 2 1803 1801 and continued to 2 may 1 my ath when it we wa submitted tho the decision nt n register Kegl stir hobbs anil and receiver Ke celver seberuian Is it a lengthy document they find that tho the charge that assess asso me benl t work woric was not dono done on the iho nona nom do plume dumo for 1685 and 1 Is without foundation and that tile bulk of the iho testimony entirely disproves the charges chang us of the elio on bors of the roadside and rat kal tier also that while the application to for alio noni was irregular at tho the than it was made instills tile the aers riot not sue so h as t to 0 warra warrant n t can cancellation cell aaion that tho the application and subsequent entry of the iho and rattler arb based ou on locations and it 11 cluade and khouli bo be can canceled colod all add it that the ordise cancelling tile tho norn oni I 1 de dc plume applice application aaion should bo be reveled it and nd sald application rolo stated and the applicant A A cole should be upon furnishing tho the evidence required of all final claimants in mineral cages per A t to ILI blakc k a anil out entry forthe for the norn do de plume Pl iroe thirty days time Is allowed in which to tako take ao an appeal |
