Show the cross before christ tile memoir nier noir rec cuLlY published by the rev father anson it ouro cure of elroy alroy at paria on the iho worship of thoi Cross before jesus brist balswick baa basso swick ruck snow adov 0 chord of loos alio ini aeo oeo a go or ortho aliu crom to chat archaeology ties bas answered that quoK location ilon in ili ilia wu say bay lu in the be lall iniZ that this reo contains noth lui lug detrimental to the dignity of tho the christian religion 0 wo o find proof of this abl in the tact feet that the most ort boJo ailts admit us as that the christianity of tile Apo liLles bad contant conk decou recourse 0 to forms of paganism in ID order to explain ilia iho new idous all this however has not prevented the debates con can copploe the worship at 0 the cross ct om before christ train from a sort at 0 in tile the ecclesiastic occle world not wag able 10 tollio toll Jo these the ibo priests ba ajao a enveloped chow in a bud it if wo aro are oot not mistaken with the exception of 0 some of at the so century the rev llev erbor k assault should bo be aljon among tile am Cat hollo prelates pr elates who bave given clau a verdict to lii favor of that ideis rut lint one ODD often dotti doi alii in artier to do wrong with the ibo abbot la in good rath busi mide chaaw to deduct gratuitous eon coo olus igne one sacs koc lUo crot on cu ft a groat gra number of tho the nf antiquity in chaldon Ch aldori india ut at Catt cn liage among the pis pd the now continent us its well ut us oil the old und abiona people wit who iliad throe or four thousand years year or only I 1 two to centuries before tho the dimna of calvary it Is to that that symbol of life of safety ia futy of nitration at tac bed to tho the cross could not hao bacany hal fany other source than a supernatural revolution Is 1 the conclusion tit ot the An sanit that neihart nei hirt per ff noru Is not admitted bym by M lejeal who in ili no article in tho the revue hari ama drawn front froni nil lill a collect collection inn of arms arn with choh to thul I 1 heury of revelation adrun ceI by tho the honorable father our conf contraro con fraro roro establishes first of ull all by the iho theory of evolution that tho the luca idea of bibich tha cho cross to li toy the sign nod and fryn bol la Is evolved to lo the ihu brain of humanity ito iio con coil scions tho the difference diree differ ronco enle between tho the of iho clio crasi for it ib Is to compare the ho former symbols symbol of baptized la in modern times tinder the daines of the ibo grouts grook malloc two tim and latin crosses frOB sea lu in order it duo BUO the gult cult which separated that N vio a udd add in our own name that the ilio latin cross on only 1 Y load biado lia tardy lurdy toward iho tho end and 0 of t thu the fifth century cun tury an then than f though it may lie he demonstrates that if clio tau tan cross cro un atod it too latin cros represent ments of torture tho the pro lout bornn odthe bif alio cross ero do dob HO wall respond to ane mccoun ry 10 tuhkio beai of I 1 torture alto A profound of tho the beliefs of ilia BOL lunia on that subject us to tile that the raws in pa slog ill rough tile tho differently turnip bu bus scon como 0 to 6 ila d low niale I lar ilar la rac to dilaive let ft wast rc TIT of tho the or croas 0 w wu 1 binally adopted by christianity at alio ti ossa ame ma alo wit w he ab many othor other ancl tit sj which ell imd d a certain 0 de degneo greo of spirituality the now religion moreover found is powerful footrest lo in lt at appropriation thu the borrowed arbol 4 bad a 11 long ions tradition radi tion behind them they iby enjoyed tile thu or nf iho sod ro culled to them abstract jidas of death unit und the rc aich be had zoly eln elros under tile iho crosses of and Bac chol i osiris and bacchus did they biot also a painful and a roan krecu elon fell for public opinion from ilia hie par itai ft deg burned boru Jo ru |