Show the giggle arid and the aisig an extraordinary hypothesis was advanced in a london court yesterday by one me of the iho witnesses against lady dunlo from whom tier her husband tho the noble viscount Is trying to get a divorce this witness was a detective employed by his lordship and his coll conclusions clu sli showed oNd remarkable reasoning powers lie ile is an inductive philosopher of 0 the tha first class she wasil t what you might call a kissiah cissi of fin in maud lid beasts ise not as I 1 secer do it testified this keen ob observer but they was skylarking sky larkin near a winder ban ian lil hl card a giggle what do you moin to declare sir demanded tho the magistrate ster st enily fily dons does the witness actually base his evidence on hearing unhearing ii a or as lie ile says giggle That shil wit in ind maintained the ablo able detective ili iel card rim cm gig glin han hl hi says to myself says lil hl they athey must hi ha kissed hissed just before 11 although the witness was ordered to stand doi down n and his evidence was ruled out as carsay so to speak it must bo be regarded as suggesting a highly valuable question tor for investigation and debate does tile the giggle precede tho the kiss or the als kiss the giggle and Is tile the ono the inevitable corollary and complement of 0 the other the inductions were doubt less based upon amatory y episodes to in its his own experience lie ile hail had observed that after a kiss had been triumphantly won a giggle was considered the necessary and proper prope r thing th respond with by tile tho party ot of the second part in a NN word ord the kissko tho the reason or significance ot of tile tho demonstration he be did riot not try to it was a notable natural fact faa like the red color of boiled loll lobsters gors or tho the grateful bitterness ot of malt mall extracts forthe for the judge to regard it only as an elpin clement ont of manufactured testimony and to make it the occasion of sarcasm u a and u d rebuke seems to have bon b on a conclusion bused upon a 6 narrow and material view alow of 0 the tha evidence evir lenco it was circumstantial but was it not conclusive lr 1 mall mail am and |