Show THE LAW AS TO MR CLAIM the general rule ot of law is that tho the receiver should not employ tin counsel of either ot of tho the parties milies to tin the litigation la in babich lie ile was appointed d alace their duty being to protect tile lut orests ot at their ethe clients and to watch tho the recoil fies cra proceed loea inga to tho the end that a faithful por per for formando manco of hill hia duties dullea may bo be in curci they are not its commet competent e at to a act C t us As counsel for or the re coher and their undertaking under tating to refill such capacity might frequently cast upon uon them inconsistent and conflicting alic ink duties dalles which could not be properly discharged by one and the same person hugh hub on oa receivers Hui fald va TB palau r 5 Pal pulp ge sil to la to Ato Aloo loy I 1 ray mccama 2 chile chao wf cecil adas n m woods wol 8 cl cat WO now in ili this cose case the gecels beckher or was to do justice to both parties lie he had no later ert la in defeating claims of either party Us lie was impartial but bat it was the interest of the government to hold the receiver strictly fic accountable tor for everything that lie ho did it the Roc were guilty of 0 negligence or failed to take of 0 soy pre porty that ho he could have or failed to make dill reat attempts nt to recover property that lie he could have recover iI or 1 helal led to act with business capacity or with doe diligence or with skill in handling lian illing the lund fund then it Is the duty onil and interest of 0 the attorney of the at to la make the re be eliver liable anil and hold bold him to III the 0 strictest accountability it esplain h plain thit lacro hero it was the Rocel vors later inter est cat to avoid arold all the iho responsibility that ho he could and escape all liability for bis acta cowit desired theall to call in question any acts of the receiver nuil bud tile the attorney tor for the government la is the Rec elvero attorney find the receiver has duder tho Govern Govera ineata attorn attorneys advice that attorney li is placed la in a most abi a most disgraceful position and when the reher entries in and ani attempts to lo justify jundi fy on the ground that he acted under bd ad lee ice as he does docs bore how to Is ur mr patens to ovoid the dilemma it was sir mr PE TERas duty to closely scrutinize and carefully cure fully 0 o atoll every act of tho him close to his duty overlook lux anil and condon log no dereliction of duty to the end that the governments interests might be out but mr PETI us took employment troia train the th receiver Rece iier and he bo cannot caouet question tiny any act of the receiver ne ile is es topped and his mouth js is clofed sad aad ther efra the court should ha he a said as al a l tin tile cull call forilla court did hint herelen for or euch duch a lo lation of ills his duty can receive no for such services adams vs v wood tt bod 8 col cal 3 32 aa mr fetics attempted to lo claim flint ba vi Ith drevy from tho rteela oba ver vies aft ir tina entry of final debit pi but at tle examination before jadao almost ti a month after afler the eutry ul of flail debroe 2 ur the bo wit I 1 ne keafor tits the needier be cuenot represent the government the receiver and lays fays there that to la liia ila attorney aall PETERS fees loos not Dot deny hero here la 19 PETERS 83 a basting the hotelier lu in getting lila ills anil loci dentally 10 KOfr himself both of oc which the io court lter itself has bai decided are arc excessive anil and liaa flag to lo grant curtly Suro lyno no sino man maa can believe that tho the fettel of 0 tho the government null nod the in teresta of tile HII Roc CiVer are ri diametrically oppose 3 bull in III fact tho the got him as into lu in terpo eing through another attorney lorney Bt |