| Show n SHIRKING A RESPONSIBILITY TF tilt CONCURS In I the Jt IF senate Idea Jd as to U e Panama t the dt itt 8 Ie s iven le te tet t select I t the 7 te Few 8 more eW J j Actions S1 have ba ve ever been taken by any deliberative body that off of f the senate yesterday Halting between j two 10 opinions O afraid to tJ go CO fer the people as a the sponsors of ot either Ute tile I ef the upper bouse of 0 con COR congress c gress adopted the Spooner amendment j of ts tM nl loophole through r they uld escape the dl hIe dl tIt 1 lem before them It Is II more than tha probable that Pre President l Jt dent Roosevelt will be pleased plea ed If the 1 house accedes to the senates prop et proposition 1 tion Roosevelt likes to stand and hi ht the f center of stage The Th glar of 0 the t 1 hi III Ai to him l i the t tf f responsibility In ia tta cue case should not tr have bave been thrust upon him It is true truet t i that he II would ba have ve to bear the On lM f in some measure no matter matt I which route centres decided upon Oa U be because bel l cause ca with his hla veto power he be could I If oj make me the J of any 0 route Weil 1 nigh nich Impossible i But to delegate dele te to one man the power to say what hat er shall liMn not DOt be done dOn in a matter JIla of such MIdi grave importance i not only to the United States State but to the theL L entire world hi iw too r et t a f r power for tor any an republic to un la undertake lacI cI An isthmian canal caul has hu be M become Mi i come OMe necessary ary nece to the rowing growing com comi i i of ot this t Country The s I of f is unanimous l point point The only difference e of off f opi is M to te route te Is tIM the set setter t ter Jf or Panama As Senator II Clark of at Montana very aptly atly remarked the sen te de if half Ute objection to routes were ere valid valk neither should be bB adopted but he be be believed the route should I I I IWin It hardly pt that the house win consent eC to t the matter I tHe hands of the ue president The senate lle t believe it wll mt anti and tM e evident I of the proposed p lUa te teto to prevent the enactment of any 7 canal f bOl WU at this session |
