Show f QUiNCY CROWD 1 SUED SU ED AGAIN t i f This Time Mrs Hearst and J B Bi 1 i Haggin Are Complainants c k t j CHARGE FRAUD FROM START f f t SALE TO AK AX AKA BULLE i A A NOTHER suit rait was WM filed in COld Ie t i ANOTHER ii yesterday u aa a z result of ot the th sale ale of the old Putnam t t property to the Quincy and nd by the f latter recently transferred to the Daly West Should the plaintiff win serious complications complications that could hardly fall fail to involve the Daly We t arast mM follow The plaintiffs In la the action Just juet filed fileda are a Phoebe A Hearst and J B Hag Haggin gin ghi who are represented by the law firm of Marshall Royle IS Hempstead I The defendants named are the Put Putnam Putnam nam nun Mining company the Quincy Min Mining ing Iq company William M K Ferry Perry Hen Henrietta Henrietta Henrletta rietta McLaughlin aa as a administrator of or the estate of D C McLaughlin W WW WW Ww W Armstrong James Janice T Clasby by James Farrell W V Rice D D Erwin Hen Henry ry lT Newell David Keith and aud Walter Scott Plaintiffs claim to t be the owners of ot shares hare of stock in the old Putnam company and allege that all the trans transactions transactions transactions actions leading up to first fint the bonding and leasing of the property to William WilliamM M K Ferry hrry and the extensions of the i bond and lease leue second the reducing of the price of the th bond from to third the sale eale Ie of or the property to tf the Quincy company and later its ita transfer to the were all conceived in a desire de and fraudulent in intent Intent intent tent to deprive plaintiffs of ot holdings known to have a far greater value than represented by the figures involved in inthe inthe inthe the different transactions The Th complaint alleges that the true value of the property was not only concealed con aled from plaintiffs but that they were never given proper notice of meet meetings meetIngs ings lap at which important business bu was transacted and that tat instead of protect protecting ing jug and fostering the tb interests of plain plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff tiff shareholders the th officers of ot the Put Putnam putnam Putnam nam company conspired to depress depre s and make their holdings of little value for purposes 8 of individual gain i The TM plaintiffs also allege that when the Putnam was Wall finally sold believing that everything had been done for the I best interests of the shareholders they I accepted checks che ks for l each in payment for their shares but in investigation ve showing the nature of the 1 alleged frauds perpetrated upon them by William M Ferry and those thOle oct eased associated with him bim they were prompted to seek relief at law Plaintiffs Plaintiff claim to be entitled to te SM one hundred thousandths of all aU moneys and stocks of the Quincy com corn company pany less INS the received and the moneys involved they allege amount to Including the dividends dividend paid and funds still on hand 18 O OThe The complaint deals at great length le lewith with the history of the Putnam end and companies and takes up in de do detail taU tall every act leading up to the final anal transfer of the property to the Daly West where an intimation is made madeS S that other considerations than the agreement ment to pay shares of stock for the tle property are involved and after the full recital judgment is demanded deman ed edas as follows as between plaintiffs and andraid raid aid defendants said lease leae lea and bond hOOd hOOdS S and nd the extensions and modifications thereof 1 rand ad the said transfer thereof i S to the Quincy y mining company and the Ii said deed of conveyance of said Put Putnam Putnam PutS S nam Mining company to said Quincy 5 Mining company and the said transfer traD transferS fer ferand S and conveyance of said Quincy Quiney Min Mining Mm S ing hg company to said Daly West Min lin Mining Mm lining 5 ing tog c be decreed to be null and andi void j i Second That an account be taken I of all the money and stocks received S S 4 by said paid Quincy Mining company or due to it it to ascertain the just proportion proportion proportion tion which should be b paid by defend defendants S ants anti to plaintiffs A Th nd That upon such accounting and upon ascertaining the amount of ot money and stock o eo o received a judg judgment ment meni and decree be entered in favor of plaintiffs and aDd against said de defendants defendants for the amount of tU one onehundred onehundred 1 hundred thousandths part of ot all aU said I money and stock received by said MId SS Quincy Mining company together with 1 interest less leu the said amount of 1 t 1 received by plaintiffs et e eto end and adfor 1 for costs costa of suit |