Show TOR TORRID RI D TALK JAlK OF MORGAN t ma Senator Condemns Canal CanaI Can l Policy cy of President f PRINCIPLE IS AT STAKE STAI E Er r SOUTH SOU PAVO A IS CANAL f i OlEE ER E WAYS j jj t tt T j 1 ASHINGTON Feb Feh 1 iI lit the s sate son t C I W w ate te today Mr r Morgan took the resolution n floor in hi support of his hie calling calU on ott the tM attorney general to re ye report port pan whether he had made on behalf of the United States State a purchase of the i new Panama Canal Cna na company of or any property rights were granted to toUte the Ute republic of et Colombia by b N B BV V etc ete Mr Morgan reviewed the I expenditures expenditure that were made by the theold oW old canal company and ad a the wrecking of that company Jt Unless the Ue filets facts have been misstated d he said Bu U the minister from Panama to the United States State was one of the chief movers in wrecking I that company 1 The present pr nt minister from Panama was 88 held up by b Mr fr Morgan in a most unenviable light air Ur fr Morgan o n declared that there is a spirit political domination dot toward the minority In tn the senate which re regards regards regard gards gard as lese n tle any an effort to se secure secure secure cure information as to tt the presidents part in affairs in which ch the senate is interested ted Under the drum tane he could not bind himself to a contract to be filled out by the th Panama Canal company oom any as s under tinder the u terms of article of ot Ht the treaty that company wOuld have bave the right JJ to do d Under that article Mr Morgan asserted a rt d there is no limit a as to the tha amount to be paid to the company Mr r l lorn J essect ed that Panama could hays no tao but to do the will of the canal company Thin ThIB could not however explain ej t the voluntary act of the United States tee in tying its wn heeds hl in tim the I t of the company compan In lit this connection lie he discussed ed the part played by the republic of France in inthe inthe Inthe the Panama negotiations saying that the United States ha had l made in article X I a surrender to fraud and Iniquity and it had d done do so BO under l der pressure from France Winnings in iI a Game I Discussing th the terms of the treaty treat Mr Ir Morgan that in hl effect ct it had been made between the United i Stat States and aed th canal cal company MUI III a and d he said the company could afford to pay t tto to Panama P nam no of her ter winnings in a game which waa was without equal in depravity Mr Morgan traced tile the connection con tIon of M tt T Bunau Varn with wit the Panama 4 rete reO 1 lution and declared that t t according to I Ih hi hii h own allowing 18 should hould r be pronounced persona non nOR grata greta in tOe the United States H me that if a member of ot congress were w 1 guilt guilty of or such I conduct aa as had ben pen guilty of be he would be made the subject t of If punishment He tic asserted thit I Ith Ithe the th new Panama Canal al company had never done don an hottest honest days daYt work on the canal and declared that the t intrusion lon of that company Into kite the controversy aY aYwas was offensive orte sye and nd lt Ie Ie About this treaty ae he h went on n there thre te is en aI hor of d against which the revolt r Mr Morgan closed dosed with a reference te to his long Ions advocacy of an isthmian oal and aDd also the the attitude at of f the south toward the canal t je saying that lion wM w still sUH by mercenary Upstart Despotism He fl e proceeded ed The people of the south sooth will wilt pity and oad forgive but bat wilt will not for forget forget get such as ss can caD find excuse in hi their fears of upstart despotism desP for the ac acceptance c of f gifts that are stained with fraud and are gathered from the tM wreck wre k of the the statutes enacted I by Y congress co e and aDd the laws of nations We cannot c if w we hi e 1 those these t who wh 1 tn ties lit or 01 those them who will live five that it is wabIe or Ju et t of pf reasonable to a as slat any man who tt o may ay be president pre i ent in inthe inthe I the violation of or the aws of th the land Wo V f cannot mark m down the people of the th south Ut to t the in commercial pol politics U jucs that accepts A a favor of or any party or any auy nan man as th the price of Its Ita support of r men o D who laws and trample the rJ of y the weak underfoot or of measures nae sur that ar are wrong and dishonor dI dishonorable able abie a Dietrichs Vindication After Afier th the routine business Mr lr Dietrich Nebraska rising rifling to a Ii question of per personal personal personal privilege regarding the recent in indictment Indictment against him in connection Uon with h hOt th Ot the patro in Nebraska rea read tead reada 9 a statement t regarding the tM court proceed tugs and his on the ground that h he be was not a 5 at the time his hiB al aI a teg 4 malfeasance was wag said to have or cc He saM said b lie he felt an explanation e was wag the senate senite tp t determine whether he be is fa fit to sit sU In the senate He Tie offered a II resolution authorizing the president pro protem tern tem to appoint a committee of five to tomake tomake tomake make It a full evil investigation and report to the senate Mute concerning the charge eha e and his aCQuittal The nl charges related red to the pos postoffiCe office ice at Hastings Neb N he appointment of Jacob Fisher t ber as postmaster and ami the se If selection lection leedon of a building but lug owned br by Dietrich as a a Mr lr Dietrich DIetri h was charged h 1 ro I with wit g a bribe but the charge was disposed of o by l y the courts couris rIS in Nebraska I without hout a full investigation having been ien bad TINt This resolution was w adopted Later in Ui the Ole day the chair named a to In make mke the inquiry J demanded by DY Mr of Hoar for Plat Mat Conn Spoon r J Jand and Pettus t J |