Show C HIS WIFE WI FE EOR UR TO tOJO flUME GOME ME MEI t I How Dr r John R Park Regarded granted Anna Ana A I I WAS AS TO BE SEALED W 9 s J A Elf HIS D ow r 4 I I question whether hether Dr John K n SPark lark after hi hIM celestial rEle marriage had lf as a a m man manor 01 tr had hij admitted to society Iet y that he be had a wife Fife Ire Wa us one that the pro ecu ion on attempted to prove in the arm aarm nth yesterday in the suit of Mrs Mn Anna nna F A Hilton lIlton against W 8 S Jac Mc ornick seeks to recover a av I v s Interim fIt In some property plO ert Dr Park her husband dis disposed dl posed po of at without her signature md nd which was waa w later transferred d to the banker bank r Banker McCornick was w the th most mo t im important It who took the stand stana during durl the day He oui l not say ay I that he b knew that bat William Hilton T held himself out as aa a the husband of Mrs d Hilton Neither did he know kaow I 44 4 whether t t r r Park claimed clamed to be a married man Upon c examination Mr fro r nick said ad lei he be never saw aw the plaintiff and Dr Park together t before bet the t lat 11 latter latter ter tn died He swore that he always t considered 0 the doctor an unmarried man maa and never r heard beard anyone as aa near neara as a he be could remember refute that sup supposition position uc J Recalled The hanker ker said suld hi he purchased the property t In question some nw time tinie In till 1888 l land and that today toIa It Is I worth orth only about bout U less than what he paid for tor it itH H B had not the th slightest Idea that Mrs In rs p Hilton was In Shy any an way wa Interested Inter to the property until shortly before the present suit It was wan as begun TIle The Tb days sa proceeding began with wit the reading of the affidavit of ot Mrs Hannah H C Wells Well who ho was physically unable unal le to attend court The affidavit to is the te same ame as the one used in a pre previous trial t which was w wa carried to the tate state supreme e court It was wp at Iier ier home that lb the marriage ceremony ny be between tweet tween Mrs Mn then thee Mas MI Anna Annaf f and Dr PP Park was w sol 1101 solemnised tie 4 insl It was performed I by her ber husband IId Daniel H Wells wens She said Miss XI was wu a very vel tick sick woman wom and expressed the tM desire A 4 4 to ti be sealed pealed to some esme 80 Ie man for eternity To gratify he h hei i f wish wi the th doctor was tient Reat lor and the t ceremony remony was s per performed performed formed After Atter describing as au wen well as he could remember the th scene De attend attendant attendant attendant ant upon fn D the marriage marri Mrs K Wells i salt said Miss Mies K told her that mat she he had obtained a church h 1 divorce from Dr Park Parle t t t Consider Coder It Tt Binding Mrs I Eliza Ell testified to t the that Mrs K rs Young Toung Youn nt her to tot tot et t JOr 0 Park She be said id that the U doc doctor doctor doctor tor said It was wu only a sealing marriage marri and that Mrs Hilton said Id It was wu a n marriage for eternity only that ti V did not net consider cod r it a R marriage mama after OM he got well wU The witness testified to other othel Immaterial matters maUers relative r JaU to the scenes immediately attendant upu ur n a the marriage nt Hiram Uram 8 0 Toung loung Youn cashier In the D Deret Dk Die eret ret National bank said that he bit bethought tAr thought Miss XI Armitage was In a semi suI semiconscious conscious condition at the Utile time of t w marriage ma Among Amon those who wars ware w present h ie said were re his bl mother tt II l It b wife wl wl e Mrs Mr and ana Of Th 8 tO He said Mid the woman n looked as a title she were f dying when hen the ceremony moDY was wu performed by bF Mr Wells The testimony of or Caroline Chapman who vho was acquainted with many im immaterial Immaterial Immaterial material facts tach In the tb caseS case was waR fol followed lowed Jo W bb the reading read In of the testimony t C of nf f Lucy Ly Q G Young Toung y oun given fiven at the first trial of ot the case calle It was wa C Introduced to show that Dr Park Prk at atthe t the time thae of or the marriage said w he be was wa willing to tG be sealed eal d for eternity but hut would not BOt take Miss MI K as a his h lawful wife |