| Show ANSWER OF LAWYER DELMAS TO THE THES S SUIT OF COMMISSIONER HUSTON Hur te to The Th San n Francisco JI April ID J D M Dehn u uthe the welt well known lawyer wyer who to s accused by Police Polke Commissioner eo er H jL W Hut Hutt Rutten ton tonof ft of conspiring to secure Mn Mrs Muttons Hutton I money mone late sat thIs the afternoon tiled filed his hi an answer aner answer er In the superior court 1 de denies denice nice nies Ies specifically the various charges in Muttons Hutton twit suit and nd also alao explains his hia own position in the affair altair H to I alleged by hy Hutton Mutton to have bave Induced Mrs Mn Hutton to leave ave her h r home for a room roo in Iii a hotel botel at t Salt Lake Lak City and there kept her hw in 10 confinement and also aIo to have Induced Indu I her bar to sell II property In San Ban Francisco worth 5 unG 6 X and kept of that money oney I as aa a fee fCC for no legal services whatever r Replying to these allegations Delmas Del Dely says Raya y in his he formal foraI answer that he did not meet Mrs Mn Hutton until long lone after aft r raM she aM sold her property through th a real 1 es H estate tate agency a ny under contract signed Den Dee 12 1 WE ISO It was waa in February he be says aya that Mrs Mn Hutton called at t his h office seeking advice He says MY Statement of et e DelM At that time and during dunna the u th course conree of subsequent communications ane he in informed informed formed me that It U wU w her ber w wand and Intention to obtain a from her husband She stated that her husband h desired to drive her Mr off her property for lor his hie own benefit and that in order to ac an accomplish t tp p his purpose he be had fn given out u that she was of unsound mind and in incompetent incompetent I I competent to manage e her affairs that lie he e had said Mid to her that as all one of the Use police commissioners of this thia city he gr t power that the whole pollee to force e wax wu subject to his hii hl control and that tl ti authority of the mayor of the city waa nothing compared to his hi own that he could deal with her hOr and her ber PIO W aa ag ahe he and aDd that if ft she abs be attempted to oppose op him he be would crush crus her She be 01 ex cx expressed pressed great dread that he lie would carry eam carryout carryout out hta hia threats and would by virtue of the power which he be and by mean means of false testimony secure Ia sad and d that for these reasons she He had bad deter determined determined mined to sell ell her ber property ao on that she lIbe could dispose dl PM of the proceeds pr pro eada according aCCO to her own wish and without any inter interference ference ferenee from him as It was her rinD r y so sore e that no part pan of ot it should go o to i him bias Lawyer LaW Get Gets 10 Per Par Cant After repeated Interviews this thill defend defendant end ant consented to be retained by her bel and to act at for tor her as aa her attorney hi In said Id Idun matters un hi compensation lOp as ai upon u between n them the at t that time to b bp H It 1 per pee percent cent rent of the purchase price of ot salt sJ prop erty arty Delmas Deima denMa ft that he induced tad Mrs Mr Hutton to go CO to Salt Palt Lake LQ that she fe concealed or under guard there and that she aile to Is prevented from seeing her meads friends or her husband He denies den that tt he ever advised her to separate her hue bus band or to obtain a divorce from fro hint him hi hiI I but on Oft the contrary he left eft her r to todo todo todo do as she aSia Pleased plea ed |
