Show LOSES HIS HOMESTEAD United Vp St Court C V V O C Settler S tf leI 1 CE CENTRAL RALP IP GASE I V VV VV V Ji GRAHAM UNLAWFUL T TAIO CAS V VOn On from the theof of the United S x V the judgment ju nt of the V J supreme V court ourt courtin in m the ase of D P arpey appellant vs s 8 Andrew Madden Madd n 9 supreme court yesterday ordered thu mandate trans tron transmitted muted to the district coutt coui of o 9 Sox ox Elder Eider county The action was waS s brought broU ht to recover r co r possession of or a at quarter sec see section section tion of land In Box H x Elder Bidet county the title to which defendant acquired from the government on a homestead patent and the plaintiff claiming under a B deed from the Central Pacific railroad corn com company pany the land lan being i within the mile limit of the Uie sections granted rant d by bytho bythe the tho ih government to the railroad The lower court found in defendants favor and the supreme court affirmed this judgment but the United States Stat s su supreme supreme supreme preme court reverses the judgment and remands the case to be determined in plaintiffs favor The ear car carries t mien des with it a judgment of for costs against respondent Graham Cohabitation Case The case ca e of the state against John C V Graham the former postmaster of Provo convicted in itt the district court courtin in this city of unlawful cohabitation V was wag as argued on appeal yesterday in the supreme court The argument on be behalf behalf behalf half of Graham the Appellant ant was vas presented by Arthur Brown and W Barnes and the reply was made by Deputy Attorney General White for forthe forth forthe the th state The point involved Is as to Whether a person p accused of a crime committed partly in one county and partly in another may m nia be tried in either county the appellant contending that the court had no jurisdiction to try tr him in Salt Lake county where he was convicted a is as part of ot the crime is al iii alleged alleged to have been committed In Utah county where his legal le J wife resides The same question is involved in the case against Brigham H Roberts which will be argued on appeal today The appeal in the th case of f the state against Jesse Reynolds R from the Sev Seventh Seventh Seventh judicial district was dismissed for the reason that th t defendant and ap appellant appellant had failed to tile file an abstract or ora orn ora a n brief with the appeal |